Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Back Scatter" wrote in message news:wGJUc.106422$xk.18191@fed1read01... Gee folks all the posts today had nothing to do with Amateur Radio DXing CB doesn't belong here For sale Items belong on rec.radio.swap Shortwave stuff belongs on rec.radio.shortwave I'll assume this last one was directed at me. I'll also assume that you didn't bother to follow the entire thread, because otherwise your post today makes little sense as regards myself. Maybe you ought to go back and read it, or re-read it if I'm mistaken. As it turns out, the unusual signal that I was getting in the MW band (that's the part that you need to pay attention to) was an image or spurious signal resulting from a SW band transmission, and was caused by an inferior receiver. I didn't know that when I posted here, but thanks to in part Doug Smith I now understand what's going on. If I had posted my "Why am I receiving at 1615 MW?" question in the shortwave group, no doubt your doppleganger over there would have jumped my ass for an off-topic post since -clearly- it was a MW question. I can continue, if you'd like. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Honus" wrote in message
... "Back Scatter" wrote in message news:wGJUc.106422$xk.18191@fed1read01... Gee folks all the posts today had nothing to do with Amateur Radio DXing CB doesn't belong here For sale Items belong on rec.radio.swap Shortwave stuff belongs on rec.radio.shortwave I'll assume this last one was directed at me. I'll also assume that you didn't bother to follow the entire thread, because otherwise your post today makes little sense as regards myself. Maybe you ought to go back and read it, or re-read it if I'm mistaken. As it turns out, the unusual signal that I was getting in the MW band (that's the part that you need to pay attention to) was an image or spurious signal resulting from a SW band transmission, and was caused by an inferior receiver. I didn't know that when I posted here, but thanks to in part Doug Smith I now understand what's going on. If I had posted my "Why am I receiving at 1615 MW?" question in the shortwave group, no doubt your doppleganger over there would have jumped my ass for an off-topic post since -clearly- it was a MW question. I can continue, if you'd like. Oh yes, please do go on. Was it a spur, was it the actual signal? Have you heard it again? At what times? Did you get station ID? What were you hearing on 160 at the time? -- ... Hank http://horedson.home.att.net http://w0rli.home.att.net |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hank Oredson" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message snip As it turns out, the unusual signal that I was getting in the MW band (that's the part that you need to pay attention to) was an image or spurious signal resulting from a SW band transmission, and was caused by an inferior receiver. I didn't know that when I posted here, but thanks to in part Doug Smith I now understand what's going on. If I had posted my "Why am I receiving at 1615 MW?" question in the shortwave group, no doubt your doppleganger over there would have jumped my ass for an off-topic post since -clearly- it was a MW question. I can continue, if you'd like. Oh yes, please do go on. Only since you've asked so nicely, Hank. Was it a spur, was it the actual signal? Gee. I answered that question already. How'd you miss it? Being new, I'm going to have to trust everyone that tells me that even though I received it on MW that it was in actuality an SW transmission, and not the actual MW after all, espacillay since what I'm being told makes sense. (Darn.) The whole point of this thread is that I didn't knowingly make a post to an inappropriate newsgroup. I believed that I was receiving an MW broadcast, and so I came to the dx group to verify that. It turns out that I was wrong. I didn't post my questions to the SW group because based on the evidence at hand, -that- would have been an off-topic post. I generally try pretty hard to follow netiquette. Have you heard it again? At what times? I heard it again the following night at 0650 UTC. It's about that time now, and I'm not receiving anything on 1615. Did you get station ID? I'm afraid I didn't. As I pointed out, the signal faded before I could. You must have missed that statement as well. ;/ In spite of the lack of an on-air ID I was able to tell that it was Gene Scott based on several statements that he made, and some research on the web. What were you hearing on 160 at the time? If you mean 1600 (remember, I'm new) I was probably receiving KVRI out of Blaine. I don't recall specifically. I checked the band on either side of 1615, though, which is where I think you're heading. Whatever I found on either side, it was different than what I heard on 1615. Otherwise, I wouldn't have come here in the first place. I'm not -that- much of a newbie. And let me thank you for the help you've offered me, Hank. You've made this poor rookie feel right at home. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hank Oredson" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message snip As it turns out, the unusual signal that I was getting in the MW band (that's the part that you need to pay attention to) was an image or spurious signal resulting from a SW band transmission, and was caused by an inferior receiver. I didn't know that when I posted here, but thanks to in part Doug Smith I now understand what's going on. If I had posted my "Why am I receiving at 1615 MW?" question in the shortwave group, no doubt your doppleganger over there would have jumped my ass for an off-topic post since -clearly- it was a MW question. I can continue, if you'd like. Oh yes, please do go on. Only since you've asked so nicely, Hank. Was it a spur, was it the actual signal? Gee. I answered that question already. How'd you miss it? Being new, I'm going to have to trust everyone that tells me that even though I received it on MW that it was in actuality an SW transmission, and not the actual MW after all, espacillay since what I'm being told makes sense. (Darn.) The whole point of this thread is that I didn't knowingly make a post to an inappropriate newsgroup. I believed that I was receiving an MW broadcast, and so I came to the dx group to verify that. It turns out that I was wrong. I didn't post my questions to the SW group because based on the evidence at hand, -that- would have been an off-topic post. I generally try pretty hard to follow netiquette. Have you heard it again? At what times? I heard it again the following night at 0650 UTC. It's about that time now, and I'm not receiving anything on 1615. Did you get station ID? I'm afraid I didn't. As I pointed out, the signal faded before I could. You must have missed that statement as well. ;/ In spite of the lack of an on-air ID I was able to tell that it was Gene Scott based on several statements that he made, and some research on the web. What were you hearing on 160 at the time? If you mean 1600 (remember, I'm new) I was probably receiving KVRI out of Blaine. I don't recall specifically. I checked the band on either side of 1615, though, which is where I think you're heading. Whatever I found on either side, it was different than what I heard on 1615. Otherwise, I wouldn't have come here in the first place. I'm not -that- much of a newbie. And let me thank you for the help you've offered me, Hank. You've made this poor rookie feel right at home. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Honus" wrote in message
... "Back Scatter" wrote in message news:wGJUc.106422$xk.18191@fed1read01... Gee folks all the posts today had nothing to do with Amateur Radio DXing CB doesn't belong here For sale Items belong on rec.radio.swap Shortwave stuff belongs on rec.radio.shortwave I'll assume this last one was directed at me. I'll also assume that you didn't bother to follow the entire thread, because otherwise your post today makes little sense as regards myself. Maybe you ought to go back and read it, or re-read it if I'm mistaken. As it turns out, the unusual signal that I was getting in the MW band (that's the part that you need to pay attention to) was an image or spurious signal resulting from a SW band transmission, and was caused by an inferior receiver. I didn't know that when I posted here, but thanks to in part Doug Smith I now understand what's going on. If I had posted my "Why am I receiving at 1615 MW?" question in the shortwave group, no doubt your doppleganger over there would have jumped my ass for an off-topic post since -clearly- it was a MW question. I can continue, if you'd like. Oh yes, please do go on. Was it a spur, was it the actual signal? Have you heard it again? At what times? Did you get station ID? What were you hearing on 160 at the time? -- ... Hank http://horedson.home.att.net http://w0rli.home.att.net |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|