|
Let's take back ham radio!
get help wrote: On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote: in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL Indeed you're not. ah but we are indeed we are almost the majority of ham now now |
Let's take back ham radio!
On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:
get help wrote: On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote: in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL Indeed you're not. ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now Indeed you are. ---- In message om, wrote "If I want a cock I go for a man if I want pussy I go fo r a fmeale simple as that [sic]" |
Let's take back ham radio!
get help wrote: On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 wrote: get help wrote: ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now Indeed you are. you are a forger poor loser |
Let's take back ham radio!
"an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... get help wrote: On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote: in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL Indeed I'm not. -- Mark caught forging using Steve's name. "Steve's" post has headers: X-Complaints-To: X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42 Your reply contains headers: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42 Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42 'Nuff said. www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:49:38 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:46 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: "an old freind" wrote in message roups.com... get help wrote: On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote: in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL Indeed I'm a poor forger So why do you forge? http://marksspamblog.blogspot.com ---- In message . com, Mark Morgan replied "yes I did. your point?" when accused of confessing publicly to having beer enemas. |
Let's take back ham radio!
The Kat wrote in
: On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:06:22 -0400, Al Klein wrote: WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup?? Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk. Hey, This thread is about CW and ham radio. You scanner assholes stay out of it. Go find some police or fireman to listen to. Sc |
Let's take back ham radio!
Slow Code wrote: The Kat wrote in : Hey, This thread is about CW and ham radio. you started the thread in those gruops to troll them so you could bitch when they complained |
Let's take back ham radio!
Nah, if ya can't beat 'em join 'em.... Help us out, we're making a Comm-Post pile! And my answer is this: If someone took ham radio, let 'em have it. Fighting to get it back is like fighting over a turd in the sewer. Just enjoy what you have, and float on down the river, to your Cajun hideaway..... rb "Travis Jordan" wrote in message m... Slow Code wrote: 1: No more Please don't feed the trolls. |
Let's take back ham radio!
Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in
the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb "Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:59:00 GMT, "Woody" wrote: Oh, and .75 cent gasoline too.... 25 cent gas. I guess I'm older than you. |
Let's take back ham radio!
OK.... taking a poll....
By replying only in CW, either text dit-dah, or periods and hyphens...... How many people actually read that, and what is your analysis of the report? I am running a script to see how long it takes you to click reply, enter your response, then click send. Your effective scaled-score code speed will be calculated from those particular clicks, along with the character count of the message. You will be made fun of, according to your CW speed. Anyone less than 24wpm will be required to take the new FCC remedial code speed Enzyte Exam for phallic phlops. Gentlemen, gud luck. rb "Travis Jordan" wrote in message . .. Slow Code wrote: 1: No more Amateur radio is in decline and you think putting Morse code back in as a requirement would help? Bwhahahahaha. ---------------- Statistics courtesy of George McCouch, K3UD. Total active individual licenses as of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 Tech/+ - 334,254 General - 112,677 Advanced - 99,782 Extra - 78,750 Total all classes - 674,792 Total active individual licenses as of June 30, 2006: Novice - 24,877 (-49.57%) (-24,456) Tech/+ - 320,242 (-4.20%) (-14,012) General - 132,758 (+17.82%) (+20,081) Advanced - 71,753 (-28.13%) (-28,029) Extra - 108,184 (+37.38%) (+29,434) Total All Classes: 657,814 (-1,405 since the March 2006 reporting period) Total all classes (5/14/00) - 674,792 Total all Classes (4/21/03) - 687,860 Total all classes (9/6/04 ) - 674,788 Total all classes (6/30/06) - 657,814 Total loss of 16,978 since 5/14/2000 (Was 674,792) Total loss of 16,974 since 9/6/2004 (Was 674,788) Total Loss of 30,066 since 4/2003 (all time high of 687,860) We lost: 842 Novice 1,088 General 1,157 Advanced 3,087 Total We Gained: 1,258 Tech/+ 424 Extra 1,682 Total This is an overall 1,405 decline since the March reporting period and averages 467 per month for the quarter. For the months March April and May the new licenses issued break down as follows. 6,999 Tech/+ 89.3% ** 627 General 8.0% 217 Extra 2.7% Total new licenses issues during the period - 7,849 ** These numbers come from the very interesting and comprehensive website of Joe Speroni, AH0A http://www.ah0a.org Numbers of US population and the number of hams at the start of each decade from 1930. Year Population # Hams Growth Rate 1930 123,202,624 19,000 1940 132,164,569 56,000 194% 1950 151,325,798 87,000 55% 1960 179,323,175 230,000 164% 1970 203,211,926 263,918 15% 1980 226,545,805 393,353 49% 1990 248,709,873 502,677 28% 2000 281,421,906 682,240 36% 2006 657,814 -3.6 % The 2006 number was as of June 30, 2006. |
Let's take back ham radio!
Man, of COURSE, it's still around.
If you discuss ham radio with others, do you mention contacting the Space Shuttle? ham radio satellites? weak signal work in VHF/UHF? Sporadic E? Tropospheric Ducting? DX??? How about EME? You don't have to be doing these things yourself, you just need to let everyone know what the ENTIRE hobby is about. Huh? You mean there is something besides CW?? Man, don't you know CW saves lives?!?!? Listen, Weak signals are for CW work on HF while boats are burning. Contacting the space shuttle is just pointless unless you're correcting their keplerian elements for the return flight path or asking if they really drink Tang, Sporadic E [aka EMF bombing] is really ****ing off the Condensation Entities that periodically enter the atmosphere to scan for intelligent life, and tropospheric ducting is a lie. I happen to have the control codes to several am-sats and I randomly change the freqs all the time, and you suckers fall for it without fail.... And DX? Hello....? Internet....? :-) rb |
Let's take back ham radio!
Scanners?? Cool movie...
rb "wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål SËÇürîty" wrote in message ... W H O T H E F U C K C A R E S ! ! ! ! THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! jawod wrote: Travis Jordan wrote: Slow Code wrote: 1: No more Amateur radio is in decline and you think putting Morse code back in as a requirement would help? Bwhahahahaha. ---------------- Statistics courtesy of George McCouch, K3UD. Total active individual licenses as of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 Tech/+ - 334,254 General - 112,677 Advanced - 99,782 Extra - 78,750 Total all classes - 674,792 Total active individual licenses as of June 30, 2006: Novice - 24,877 (-49.57%) (-24,456) Tech/+ - 320,242 (-4.20%) (-14,012) General - 132,758 (+17.82%) (+20,081) Advanced - 71,753 (-28.13%) (-28,029) Extra - 108,184 (+37.38%) (+29,434) Total All Classes: 657,814 (-1,405 since the March 2006 reporting period) Total all classes (5/14/00) - 674,792 Total all Classes (4/21/03) - 687,860 Total all classes (9/6/04 ) - 674,788 Total all classes (6/30/06) - 657,814 Total loss of 16,978 since 5/14/2000 (Was 674,792) Total loss of 16,974 since 9/6/2004 (Was 674,788) Total Loss of 30,066 since 4/2003 (all time high of 687,860) We lost: 842 Novice 1,088 General 1,157 Advanced 3,087 Total We Gained: 1,258 Tech/+ 424 Extra 1,682 Total This is an overall 1,405 decline since the March reporting period and averages 467 per month for the quarter. For the months March April and May the new licenses issued break down as follows. 6,999 Tech/+ 89.3% ** 627 General 8.0% 217 Extra 2.7% Total new licenses issues during the period - 7,849 ** These numbers come from the very interesting and comprehensive website of Joe Speroni, AH0A http://www.ah0a.org Numbers of US population and the number of hams at the start of each decade from 1930. Year Population # Hams Growth Rate 1930 123,202,624 19,000 1940 132,164,569 56,000 194% 1950 151,325,798 87,000 55% 1960 179,323,175 230,000 164% 1970 203,211,926 263,918 15% 1980 226,545,805 393,353 49% 1990 248,709,873 502,677 28% 2000 281,421,906 682,240 36% 2006 657,814 -3.6 % The 2006 number was as of June 30, 2006. I just read the latest QST. In "How's DX?" the author notes that ham radio "used to be" the prime communication from and to Haiti. But now, with cell phones, satellite, etc. it is no longer as important. This is the real world. Morse is NOT the issue. Relevance (is that the correct spelling?) is the issue. Ham radio really WANTS to help in emergencies. This is very commendable. I think, though, we've been sidelined. We're still there "when all else fails". Morale of those involved remains high, from what I hear / read. However, in a typical emergency, ham radio is not nearly as primary as it used to be. It's OK. We can still contribute. Communications have been "universalized"...anyone can use a cell phone. It's natural that communications-specialists see their need waning. It's OK. As a hobby, ham radio has a LOT to offer. When I mention to others that I have re-entered ham radio, many people ask "Is that still around?" Man, of COURSE, it's still around. If you discuss ham radio with others, do you mention contacting the Space Shuttle? ham radio satellites? weak signal work in VHF/UHF? Sporadic E? Tropospheric Ducting? DX??? How about EME? You don't have to be doing these things yourself, you just need to let everyone know what the ENTIRE hobby is about. Morse, data, SSB, FM all have a place. Ham radio is NOT dying. Hams are. Share our hobby, in ALL its forms, generously with those you know. The rest will take care of itself, for better or worse. John AB8O --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 3:06:02 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 3:10:56 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
Two words:
Comm-Post Pile ! Plus we like to see you knuckle-draggers bounce, grunt and beat your chests... rb "The Kat" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:25:30 -0400, jawod wrote: Travis Jordan wrote: WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup?? Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk. This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity... Remove XYZ to email me |
Let's take back ham radio!
Ok, forget my previous poll posting, and stop the world, I want off.....
Al, buddy,... my wife has a hundred friends, lemme hook you up bro. rb "Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:58:07 GMT, "Travis Jordan" wrote: Change 5/14/00 to 4/2/03 - *+*13068 Change 4/2/03 to 9/6/04 - -13072 Change 9/6/04 to 6/30/06 - -16974 There was no change in Morse from 5/14/00 to 4/2/03, yet we GAINED over 13,000 hams, so how is a Morse requirement decreasing the number of hams? |
Let's take back ham radio!
To keep you informed of your need to learn CW, so you can save lives too?
rb "The Kat" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:06:22 -0400, Al Klein wrote: WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup?? Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk. This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity... Remove XYZ to email me |
Let's take back ham radio!
Nazis suck, dude.
I'll learn 100wpm CW if it only ends the life on a single Nazi. rb "Drake nazi" wrote in message ups.com... The Kat wrote: On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:06:22 -0400, Al Klein wrote: WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup?? Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk. This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity... Remove XYZ to email me |
Let's take back ham radio!
Yeah, you sure told yourself off but good, too.
I wouldn't take that kinda trash from an inbred skinhead if I were you! rb "Drake nazi" wrote in message oups.com... Why did you give your ham radio away fool? No 6 meters for you, one year! |
Let's take back ham radio!
Woody wrote:
Man, of COURSE, it's still around. If you discuss ham radio with others, do you mention contacting the Space Shuttle? ham radio satellites? weak signal work in VHF/UHF? Sporadic E? Tropospheric Ducting? DX??? How about EME? You don't have to be doing these things yourself, you just need to let everyone know what the ENTIRE hobby is about. Huh? You mean there is something besides CW?? Man, don't you know CW saves lives?!?!? Listen, Weak signals are for CW work on HF while boats are burning. Contacting the space shuttle is just pointless unless you're correcting their keplerian elements for the return flight path or asking if they really drink Tang, Sporadic E [aka EMF bombing] is really ****ing off the Condensation Entities that periodically enter the atmosphere to scan for intelligent life, and tropospheric ducting is a lie. I happen to have the control codes to several am-sats and I randomly change the freqs all the time, and you suckers fall for it without fail.... And DX? Hello....? Internet....? :-) rb Interesting name, Woody. Yet, it seems to fit. |
Let's take back ham radio!
By replying only in CW, either text dit-dah, or periods and hyphens......
How many people actually read that, and what is your analysis of the report? "Woody" wrote in message news:7WrIg.2666$nR2.321@trnddc03... OK.... taking a poll.... By replying only in CW, either text dit-dah, or periods and hyphens...... How many people actually read that, and what is your analysis of the report? ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ....---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... Jack I am running a script to see how long it takes you to click reply, enter your response, then click send. Your effective scaled-score code speed will be calculated from those particular clicks, along with the character count of the message. You will be made fun of, according to your CW speed. Anyone less than 24wpm will be required to take the new FCC remedial code speed Enzyte Exam for phallic phlops. Gentlemen, gud luck. rb "Travis Jordan" wrote in message . .. Slow Code wrote: 1: No more Amateur radio is in decline and you think putting Morse code back in as a requirement would help? Bwhahahahaha. ---------------- Statistics courtesy of George McCouch, K3UD. Total active individual licenses as of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 Tech/+ - 334,254 General - 112,677 Advanced - 99,782 Extra - 78,750 Total all classes - 674,792 Total active individual licenses as of June 30, 2006: Novice - 24,877 (-49.57%) (-24,456) Tech/+ - 320,242 (-4.20%) (-14,012) General - 132,758 (+17.82%) (+20,081) Advanced - 71,753 (-28.13%) (-28,029) Extra - 108,184 (+37.38%) (+29,434) Total All Classes: 657,814 (-1,405 since the March 2006 reporting period) Total all classes (5/14/00) - 674,792 Total all Classes (4/21/03) - 687,860 Total all classes (9/6/04 ) - 674,788 Total all classes (6/30/06) - 657,814 Total loss of 16,978 since 5/14/2000 (Was 674,792) Total loss of 16,974 since 9/6/2004 (Was 674,788) Total Loss of 30,066 since 4/2003 (all time high of 687,860) We lost: 842 Novice 1,088 General 1,157 Advanced 3,087 Total We Gained: 1,258 Tech/+ 424 Extra 1,682 Total This is an overall 1,405 decline since the March reporting period and averages 467 per month for the quarter. For the months March April and May the new licenses issued break down as follows. 6,999 Tech/+ 89.3% ** 627 General 8.0% 217 Extra 2.7% Total new licenses issues during the period - 7,849 ** These numbers come from the very interesting and comprehensive website of Joe Speroni, AH0A http://www.ah0a.org Numbers of US population and the number of hams at the start of each decade from 1930. Year Population # Hams Growth Rate 1930 123,202,624 19,000 1940 132,164,569 56,000 194% 1950 151,325,798 87,000 55% 1960 179,323,175 230,000 164% 1970 203,211,926 263,918 15% 1980 226,545,805 393,353 49% 1990 248,709,873 502,677 28% 2000 281,421,906 682,240 36% 2006 657,814 -3.6 % The 2006 number was as of June 30, 2006. |
Let's take back ham radio!
THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR
RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! jawod wrote: Woody wrote: Man, of COURSE, it's still around. If you discuss ham radio with others, do you mention contacting the Space Shuttle? ham radio satellites? weak signal work in VHF/UHF? Sporadic E? Tropospheric Ducting? DX??? How about EME? You don't have to be doing these things yourself, you just need to let everyone know what the ENTIRE hobby is about. Huh? You mean there is something besides CW?? Man, don't you know CW saves lives?!?!? Listen, Weak signals are for CW work on HF while boats are burning. Contacting the space shuttle is just pointless unless you're correcting their keplerian elements for the return flight path or asking if they really drink Tang, Sporadic E [aka EMF bombing] is really ****ing off the Condensation Entities that periodically enter the atmosphere to scan for intelligent life, and tropospheric ducting is a lie. I happen to have the control codes to several am-sats and I randomly change the freqs all the time, and you suckers fall for it without fail.... And DX? Hello....? Internet....? :-) rb Interesting name, Woody. Yet, it seems to fit. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:46:51 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:47:08 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR
RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! Woody wrote: Yeah, you sure told yourself off but good, too. I wouldn't take that kinda trash from an inbred skinhead if I were you! rb "Drake nazi" wrote in message oups.com... Why did you give your ham radio away fool? No 6 meters for you, one year! --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:44:14 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:47:18 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR
RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! Woody wrote: Yeah, you sure told yourself off but good, too. I wouldn't take that kinda trash from an inbred skinhead if I were you! rb "Drake nazi" wrote in message oups.com... Why did you give your ham radio away fool? No 6 meters for you, one year! --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:44:14 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:47:26 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR
RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! Woody wrote: To keep you informed of your need to learn CW, so you can save lives too? rb "The Kat" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:06:22 -0400, Al Klein wrote: WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup?? Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk. This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity... Remove XYZ to email me --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:44:26 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:47:47 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR
RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! Jack Ricci wrote: By replying only in CW, either text dit-dah, or periods and hyphens...... How many people actually read that, and what is your analysis of the report? "Woody" wrote in message news:7WrIg.2666$nR2.321@trnddc03... OK.... taking a poll.... By replying only in CW, either text dit-dah, or periods and hyphens...... How many people actually read that, and what is your analysis of the report? ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... ...---... Jack I am running a script to see how long it takes you to click reply, enter your response, then click send. Your effective scaled-score code speed will be calculated from those particular clicks, along with the character count of the message. You will be made fun of, according to your CW speed. Anyone less than 24wpm will be required to take the new FCC remedial code speed Enzyte Exam for phallic phlops. Gentlemen, gud luck. rb "Travis Jordan" wrote in message m... Slow Code wrote: 1: No more Amateur radio is in decline and you think putting Morse code back in as a requirement would help? Bwhahahahaha. ---------------- Statistics courtesy of George McCouch, K3UD. Total active individual licenses as of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 Tech/+ - 334,254 General - 112,677 Advanced - 99,782 Extra - 78,750 Total all classes - 674,792 Total active individual licenses as of June 30, 2006: Novice - 24,877 (-49.57%) (-24,456) Tech/+ - 320,242 (-4.20%) (-14,012) General - 132,758 (+17.82%) (+20,081) Advanced - 71,753 (-28.13%) (-28,029) Extra - 108,184 (+37.38%) (+29,434) Total All Classes: 657,814 (-1,405 since the March 2006 reporting period) Total all classes (5/14/00) - 674,792 Total all Classes (4/21/03) - 687,860 Total all classes (9/6/04 ) - 674,788 Total all classes (6/30/06) - 657,814 Total loss of 16,978 since 5/14/2000 (Was 674,792) Total loss of 16,974 since 9/6/2004 (Was 674,788) Total Loss of 30,066 since 4/2003 (all time high of 687,860) We lost: 842 Novice 1,088 General 1,157 Advanced 3,087 Total We Gained: 1,258 Tech/+ 424 Extra 1,682 Total This is an overall 1,405 decline since the March reporting period and averages 467 per month for the quarter. For the months March April and May the new licenses issued break down as follows. 6,999 Tech/+ 89.3% ** 627 General 8.0% 217 Extra 2.7% Total new licenses issues during the period - 7,849 ** These numbers come from the very interesting and comprehensive website of Joe Speroni, AH0A http://www.ah0a.org Numbers of US population and the number of hams at the start of each decade from 1930. Year Population # Hams Growth Rate 1930 123,202,624 19,000 1940 132,164,569 56,000 194% 1950 151,325,798 87,000 55% 1960 179,323,175 230,000 164% 1970 203,211,926 263,918 15% 1980 226,545,805 393,353 49% 1990 248,709,873 502,677 28% 2000 281,421,906 682,240 36% 2006 657,814 -3.6 % The 2006 number was as of June 30, 2006. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:44:54 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0634-2, 08/24/2006 Tested on: 8/27/2006 11:48:18 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:38:43 GMT, "Woody" wrote:
Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb ++++++++++ Fire Chief was the regular grade sold by Texaco. Their premium was Sky Chief. In the 1950s, Sunoco sold only one grade of gasoline, which was supposed to be a "near premium". Its gimmick was that it was dyed blue, whereas other gasolines were yellow to red. In the 1960s, its super-premium was Sunoco 260 from the "custom blend" pump. |
Let's take back ham radio!
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:47:07 -0400, wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål
SËÇürîty wrote: THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! ++++++++++++++++ I am reading your enlightened reply in the rec.radio.amateur.equipment group. Why are you here??? |
Let's take back ham radio!
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote: in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL +++++++++++ I know a Tech who refuses to attempt to upgrade until code is dropped. Yet he claims to have "very conservative values". He also believes that hamfests should carry more non-amateur radio related things, like old movie VCR tapes and Glenn Miller recordings. He refuses to attend any amateur radio club meeting or gathering. He wanted to have a non-amateur radio related picnic gathering of radio amateurs on the Saturday of Field Day. Nobody around here considers him to be a ham. We consider him to be a "CB-Plus". |
Let's take back ham radio!
GO **** YOURSELF! AND TAKE YOUR HAM RADIO AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR ****EN ASS
X-rated Vermonter wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:38:43 GMT, "Woody" wrote: Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb ++++++++++ Fire Chief was the regular grade sold by Texaco. Their premium was Sky Chief. In the 1950s, Sunoco sold only one grade of gasoline, which was supposed to be a "near premium". Its gimmick was that it was dyed blue, whereas other gasolines were yellow to red. In the 1960s, its super-premium was Sunoco 260 from the "custom blend" pump. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:05 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:41 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
OK SHOVE IT UP MINE FIRST!!!!!!
"wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål SËÇürîty" wrote in message ... GO **** YOURSELF! AND TAKE YOUR HAM RADIO AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR ****EN ASS X-rated Vermonter wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:38:43 GMT, "Woody" wrote: Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb ++++++++++ Fire Chief was the regular grade sold by Texaco. Their premium was Sky Chief. In the 1950s, Sunoco sold only one grade of gasoline, which was supposed to be a "near premium". Its gimmick was that it was dyed blue, whereas other gasolines were yellow to red. In the 1960s, its super-premium was Sunoco 260 from the "custom blend" pump. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:05 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:41 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
X-rated wrote: I am reading your enlightened reply in the rec.radio.amateur.equipment group. Why are you here??? becuase the ISP will not retrain the trollss anymore which means the troll crosspost everything every where this set is relitively mild and at least is confined to radio NGs |
Let's take back ham radio!
|
Let's take back ham radio!
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:47:07 -0400, wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål
SËÇürîty wrote: THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. No one. plonk |
Let's take back ham radio!
Al Klein wrote: On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:47:07 -0400, wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål SËÇürîty wrote: THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. No one. plonk alwys the child |
Do you ever hear CW on your scanner? Let's take back ham radio!
wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñå tîØñål SËÇürîty wrote in
: THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! Ever hear CW on your scanner? Sound neat, don't it. SC |
Let's take back ham radio!
"an old freind" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: The Kat wrote in : Hey, This thread is about CW and ham radio. you started the thread in those gruops to troll them so you could bitch when they complained Hey, This thread is about CW and ham radio. You no-codes stay out of it. Go find some CB'ers on 11 meters to listen to. SC |
Let's take back ham radio!
wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñå tîØñål SËÇürîty wrote in
: THIS IS ****EN SCANNER NEWSGROUP, NOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO. WHO **** CARES!. IF YOU ****EN IDIOTS WANT TO TALK ABOUT AMATEUR RADIO THEN GO YOUR LITTLE ****EN NEWSGROUP AND DISCUSS IT THEIR NOT HERE! Do you listen to amateur radio repeaters on your scanner? Yes? Well talk to Mark. He can tell you how to become a no code Tech. He is an expert at that because he's been a no code tech forever. 73, Happy to Help SC |
Let's take back ham radio!
Slow Code wrote:
wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñå tîØñål SËÇürîty wrote in : note your title take back meaning you lost it and you did Well talk to Mark. He can tell you how to become a no code Tech. He is an expert at that because he's been a no code tech forever. not realy only 8-9 years 73, Happy to Help SC |
Let's take back ham radio!
Stupid 40 year old memories, they're about as reliable as rain....
It appears I was quite an inattentive child, sorry... :-( rb Radio content: The Maverick had an AM/FM/8-track, and a big screwdriver for a gearshift. X-rated Vermonter wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:38:43 GMT, "Woody" wrote: Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb ++++++++++ Fire Chief was the regular grade sold by Texaco. Their premium was Sky Chief. In the 1950s, Sunoco sold only one grade of gasoline, which was supposed to be a "near premium". Its gimmick was that it was dyed blue, whereas other gasolines were yellow to red. In the 1960s, its super-premium was Sunoco 260 from the "custom blend" pump. |
Let's take back ham radio!
Ah, the day I could do that.... LOL... [the self thing... the ol' arse is
exit-only, sorry!] rb Radio content: Radios get sold every day on ebay... and no discussion is necessary... hmmm.... "wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål SËÇürîty" wrote in message ... GO **** YOURSELF! AND TAKE YOUR HAM RADIO AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR ****EN ASS X-rated Vermonter wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:38:43 GMT, "Woody" wrote: Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb ++++++++++ Fire Chief was the regular grade sold by Texaco. Their premium was Sky Chief. In the 1950s, Sunoco sold only one grade of gasoline, which was supposed to be a "near premium". Its gimmick was that it was dyed blue, whereas other gasolines were yellow to red. In the 1960s, its super-premium was Sunoco 260 from the "custom blend" pump. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:05 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:41 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Let's take back ham radio!
Eww.... yer one weird dude...
rb Radio Content: AM and FM are available on most dials. "Roger Wiseman" wrote in message ... OK SHOVE IT UP MINE FIRST!!!!!! "wîthhËld fØr rËåsØñs Øf ñåtîØñål SËÇürîty" wrote in message ... GO **** YOURSELF! AND TAKE YOUR HAM RADIO AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR ****EN ASS X-rated Vermonter wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:38:43 GMT, "Woody" wrote: Well... I can remember my dad filling 'er up with Fire Chief Hi-Test back in the day, at the Sunoco station. I'm a summer of love baby so not too old yet, LOL. rb ++++++++++ Fire Chief was the regular grade sold by Texaco. Their premium was Sky Chief. In the 1950s, Sunoco sold only one grade of gasoline, which was supposed to be a "near premium". Its gimmick was that it was dyed blue, whereas other gasolines were yellow to red. In the 1960s, its super-premium was Sunoco 260 from the "custom blend" pump. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:05 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-1, 08/28/2006 Tested on: 8/28/2006 4:12:41 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com