On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:26:13 GMT, "Richard W. Solomon, W1KSZ"
wrote:

DO NOT CONSIDER THE FT-7100, unless you need a paperweight.
It's IM rejection is non-existent. I bought one and sent it back to
YAESU for the IM "fix". It now sits in a box in the cellar. It's
USELESS.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

Well, moot point -- the ft-7100 isn't sold anymore.

Bob
k5qwg

DO NOT CONSIDER THE FT-7100, unless you need a paperweight.
It's IM rejection is non-existent. I bought one and sent it back to
YAESU for the IM "fix". It now sits in a box in the cellar. It's
USELESS.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:50:30 +0200, "F8BOE"
wrote:

Hello,

It's not bullet-proof, but the Yaesu FT7100 has an idiot-proof running mode
where only the memories can be used with no frequency tuning capabilities.
Very convenient when using the alphnumeric memory labelling.

There must be other duoband rigs handling this mode.

The FT7100 has also digital (packet abilities) up to 9k6 bauds limited to a
TXDelay of 16 (160ms).

73 de F8BOE Olivier ...-.-

Hello,

It's not bullet-proof, but the Yaesu FT7100 has an idiot-proof running mode
where only the memories can be used with no frequency tuning capabilities.
Very convenient when using the alphnumeric memory labelling.

There must be other duoband rigs handling this mode.

The FT7100 has also digital (packet abilities) up to 9k6 bauds limited to a
TXDelay of 16 (160ms).

73 de F8BOE Olivier ...-.-