|
I posted something similar to this in a different newsgroup, but I wonder if
based on the logic that the interference could also affect other services such as emergency services, aircraft frequencies, and even military frequency allocations, it would seem to me to be important to persuade those groups to pressure the FCC against the whole BPL thing..... -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... "recalcitrant ham op" wrote in message ... "opcom" wrote in message ... This was posted to ARLI, I don't know how many subscribe, but in spite of the numerous comments against BPL (transmitting wideband internet data over power lines, which will destroy the HF radio spectrum), the FCC seems disposed to encourage it anyway. evil! evil! just look up BPL on the web. T the noise from the radiated signals trashed the ham bands thoroughly. I guess you never heard that money talks and bull**** walks eh? Did you *REALLY THINK* that a couple hundred aging HF operating tightwad ham radio operators are going to stop an emerging technology that will conceivably network home appliances to the internet and be worth $BILLIONS$ in potential revenue ?? Jeezehus-H-christ...get F-N real !! |
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI |
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI |
"Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... Frank Dresser wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser It would more likely end the legality of 1kw for hams. Dick It probably wont take a KW to trash BPL. Just needed to communicate on HF. Dan/W4NTI |
"Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... Frank Dresser wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser It would more likely end the legality of 1kw for hams. Dick It probably wont take a KW to trash BPL. Just needed to communicate on HF. Dan/W4NTI |
"Frank Todd K3EKO" wrote in message news:M7Mcb.579252$YN5.415635@sccrnsc01... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Keith" wrote in message nk.net... On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:31:17 GMT, opcom in wrote: What have you done for Amateur Radio today? --^^--------------------------------------------------------------- The question is what has the ARRL done to the future of Ham Radio by hanging on to the Morse Code Requirement? It has killed it. -- Best Regards, Keith http://kilowatt-radio.org/ ========================================== = http://slrn.org SLRN 0.9.8.0 is out. ======================================= You really are a dumbass ain't ya Kieth? Tell me, in you apparantly drug clouded brain. How BPL and CW have anything to do with each other? Oh never mind. You ain't worth reading anylonger. Dan/W4NTI Keith, Just ignore Dan. Everyone in his mind is a DUMBASS. the only one who is perfect is HIM, PERIOD. -- 73 Frank K3EKO Gotta give ya credit Franky me boy....when your right, your right. But I don't think everyone is a dumbass. Just the people I call dumbass...like you and Keith. Dan/W4NTI |
"Frank Todd K3EKO" wrote in message news:M7Mcb.579252$YN5.415635@sccrnsc01... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Keith" wrote in message nk.net... On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:31:17 GMT, opcom in wrote: What have you done for Amateur Radio today? --^^--------------------------------------------------------------- The question is what has the ARRL done to the future of Ham Radio by hanging on to the Morse Code Requirement? It has killed it. -- Best Regards, Keith http://kilowatt-radio.org/ ========================================== = http://slrn.org SLRN 0.9.8.0 is out. ======================================= You really are a dumbass ain't ya Kieth? Tell me, in you apparantly drug clouded brain. How BPL and CW have anything to do with each other? Oh never mind. You ain't worth reading anylonger. Dan/W4NTI Keith, Just ignore Dan. Everyone in his mind is a DUMBASS. the only one who is perfect is HIM, PERIOD. -- 73 Frank K3EKO Gotta give ya credit Franky me boy....when your right, your right. But I don't think everyone is a dumbass. Just the people I call dumbass...like you and Keith. Dan/W4NTI |
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Frank Dresser |
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Frank Dresser |
OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Hmmm. That would be real interesting. The FCC restricting the use of lawfully licensed transmitters in order to accomodate Part15 unlicensed operations of incidental radiators..... Ed WB6SAT |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com