Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Hmmm. That would be real interesting. The FCC restricting the use of lawfully licensed transmitters in order to accomodate Part15 unlicensed operations of incidental radiators..... Ed WB6SAT |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Ed G. wrote:
OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Hmmm. That would be real interesting. The FCC restricting the use of lawfully licensed transmitters in order to accomodate Part15 unlicensed operations of incidental radiators..... Ed WB6SAT They'll modify the rules so it fits their agenda. remember, the FCC will do anything that can make them $$$$ for the US Treasury. 73 Frank K3EKO |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Ed G. wrote:
OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Hmmm. That would be real interesting. The FCC restricting the use of lawfully licensed transmitters in order to accomodate Part15 unlicensed operations of incidental radiators..... Ed WB6SAT They'll modify the rules so it fits their agenda. remember, the FCC will do anything that can make them $$$$ for the US Treasury. 73 Frank K3EKO |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed G." wrote in message . .. Hmmm. That would be real interesting. The FCC restricting the use of lawfully licensed transmitters in order to accomodate Part15 unlicensed operations of incidental radiators..... Ed WB6SAT Uh huh. The BPL folk have important freinds at the FCC. Do the hams? If so, why has this BPL thing gone this far? Frank Dresser |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed G." wrote in message . .. Hmmm. That would be real interesting. The FCC restricting the use of lawfully licensed transmitters in order to accomodate Part15 unlicensed operations of incidental radiators..... Ed WB6SAT Uh huh. The BPL folk have important freinds at the FCC. Do the hams? If so, why has this BPL thing gone this far? Frank Dresser |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Frank Dresser Well, hopefully, they can still read their own rules and regulations there at the FCC. You see we are the authorized legal service. And BPL is the unlicensed part 15 activity. Part 15 devices must accept interference from the licensed users. Hams. Course again, we are dealing with lawyers. So anything goes. Dan/W4NTI |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Frank Dresser Well, hopefully, they can still read their own rules and regulations there at the FCC. You see we are the authorized legal service. And BPL is the unlicensed part 15 activity. Part 15 devices must accept interference from the licensed users. Hams. Course again, we are dealing with lawyers. So anything goes. Dan/W4NTI |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... Well, hopefully, they can still read their own rules and regulations there at the FCC. You see we are the authorized legal service. And BPL is the unlicensed part 15 activity. Part 15 devices must accept interference from the licensed users. Hams. Course again, we are dealing with lawyers. So anything goes. Dan/W4NTI If they don't like what they read, they'll write new ones. Frank Dresser |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... Well, hopefully, they can still read their own rules and regulations there at the FCC. You see we are the authorized legal service. And BPL is the unlicensed part 15 activity. Part 15 devices must accept interference from the licensed users. Hams. Course again, we are dealing with lawyers. So anything goes. Dan/W4NTI If they don't like what they read, they'll write new ones. Frank Dresser |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI OK, let's say it does slow or even stop BPL near a ham station. Why wouldn't the FCC restrict amatuer operations around BPL areas? Frank Dresser Because we are a licensed service and BPL is not ... Carl - wk3c |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kenwood TS-940 & TS-930 Repair Service | Boatanchors | |||
Kenwood hf repair | Dx | |||
Kenwood hf repair | Dx | |||
Kenwood & Yaesu Repair Service | Boatanchors | |||
Kenwood 930/940 Repair Service | Boatanchors |