| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
January 4th 08, 09:51 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
How about amateur radio without the "radio?"
(John Smith) wrote in
: Bert Hyman wrote: ... That's a telephone, isn't it? And, "amateur radio" without the radio is just "amateur." Frankly, I don't think a REAL amateur cares what frequency he makes contacts on, anything from DC to X-Rays sounds OK with me It's not a "contact" when there's a wire connecting the two ends. ... but then, I don't suffer opium dreams ... Are you sure? -- Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | |
|
#2
January 4th 08, 10:02 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
|
How about amateur radio without the "radio?"
Bert Hyman wrote:
... It's not a "contact" when there's a wire connecting the two ends. ... Yeah, pretty much--telegraph immediately springs to mind, those conversations were REAL. ... but then, I don't suffer opium dreams ... Are you sure? Well, wise men told have told me, "Never say never." JS |
|
#3
January 4th 08, 11:34 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
|
How about amateur radio without the "radio?"
Bert Hyman wrote:
[...] But then, if it makes you feel any better, somewhere along the line your signal is going over fiber optic cable, cellular network, etc. ... JS |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
