Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Someone wrote " Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio?"
Well -- probably tens of thousands of Hams did well before CB and a lot still do. The mic has a rising response at the higher audio end for increased intelligibility. Read Ham reviews at URL: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1161 -- 73 From The Wilderness Keyboard "N8XYN" wrote in message ... Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio? "VHFRadioBuff" wrote in message ... I was wondering if anyone has successfully used an FT-100D with a D-104 (Silver Eagle). Any information would be appretiated. Email replies are welcome. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73! de Andy KC2SSB Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because you can use the back of the chrome mic as a mirror
to see behind your rig to plug/unplug stuff ! Try talking across the mic not directly into it, makes a nice difference. Plus they look real retro ! Keyboard In The Wilderness wrote: Someone wrote " Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio?" Well -- probably tens of thousands of Hams did well before CB and a lot still do. The mic has a rising response at the higher audio end for increased intelligibility. Read Ham reviews at URL: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1161 -- 73 From The Wilderness Keyboard "N8XYN" wrote in message ... Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio? "VHFRadioBuff" wrote in message ... I was wondering if anyone has successfully used an FT-100D with a D-104 (Silver Eagle). Any information would be appretiated. Email replies are welcome. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73! de Andy KC2SSB Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because you can use the back of the chrome mic as a mirror
to see behind your rig to plug/unplug stuff ! Try talking across the mic not directly into it, makes a nice difference. Plus they look real retro ! Keyboard In The Wilderness wrote: Someone wrote " Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio?" Well -- probably tens of thousands of Hams did well before CB and a lot still do. The mic has a rising response at the higher audio end for increased intelligibility. Read Ham reviews at URL: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1161 -- 73 From The Wilderness Keyboard "N8XYN" wrote in message ... Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio? "VHFRadioBuff" wrote in message ... I was wondering if anyone has successfully used an FT-100D with a D-104 (Silver Eagle). Any information would be appretiated. Email replies are welcome. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73! de Andy KC2SSB Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tube type...thats what they were designed for...Yes indeed, and very true.
BUT....the question from the CBer was concerning a FT100. Neither tube type or a boatanchor. Dan/W4NTI "asdf" wrote in message ... N8XYN wrote: Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio? Why not? That's what they were designed for. They vastly pre-date CB. They work well with the old tube rigs (for which they were designed). I've used them with everything from Collins and Drakes to Kenwoods and Icoms...why not??????? |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tube type...thats what they were designed for...Yes indeed, and very true.
BUT....the question from the CBer was concerning a FT100. Neither tube type or a boatanchor. Dan/W4NTI "asdf" wrote in message ... N8XYN wrote: Why would anybody put a D104 on an amateur radio? Why not? That's what they were designed for. They vastly pre-date CB. They work well with the old tube rigs (for which they were designed). I've used them with everything from Collins and Drakes to Kenwoods and Icoms...why not??????? |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Tube type...thats what they were designed for...Yes indeed, and very true. BUT....the question from the CBer was concerning a FT100. Neither tube type or a boatanchor. So? I use a D-104 on my Icom 706...and with my old Kenwood 430 and with my old Icom 735...they're neither tube-type nor boatanchor. Nor am I a CB'er. What's wrong with that??? |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Tube type...thats what they were designed for...Yes indeed, and very true. BUT....the question from the CBer was concerning a FT100. Neither tube type or a boatanchor. So? I use a D-104 on my Icom 706...and with my old Kenwood 430 and with my old Icom 735...they're neither tube-type nor boatanchor. Nor am I a CB'er. What's wrong with that??? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because you can use the back of the chrome mic as a mirror
to see behind your rig to plug/unplug stuff ! That's my favorite answer so far! ![]() Of course there's only been one or two answers that actually answered the original question, but I should expect that. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73! de Andy KC2SSB Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because you can use the back of the chrome mic as a mirror
to see behind your rig to plug/unplug stuff ! That's my favorite answer so far! ![]() Of course there's only been one or two answers that actually answered the original question, but I should expect that. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73! de Andy KC2SSB Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Is that turd goblin still replying to my posts? Geez, you'd think he would have learned by now. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73! de Andy KC2SSB Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|