On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:40:10 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


"garigue" wrote in message
news:lTmGb.32168$VB2.70624@attbi_s51...
Sounds like stolen government property to me .....

If you knew my relative, you would not accuse him of being a thief. He was
a dedicated public servant. Decorated in the Air Force. Letters of
Commendation from every FBI director, from Hoover to Webster. Letters of
thanks from every SAC he served under. He was in the forefront in the FBI's
fight against Communism, organized crime, and terrorism.

He was so honest, he refused to sneak food into movie theaters.

If you had said that to my face, you'd have woken up in County Emergency.



73 Tom KI3R
" Robin " wrote in message
link.net...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3066833923


If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:40:10 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


"garigue" wrote in message
news:lTmGb.32168$VB2.70624@attbi_s51...
Sounds like stolen government property to me .....

If you knew my relative, you would not accuse him of being a thief. He
was
a dedicated public servant. Decorated in the Air Force. Letters of
Commendation from every FBI director, from Hoover to Webster. Letters of
thanks from every SAC he served under. He was in the forefront in the
FBI's
fight against Communism, organized crime, and terrorism.

He was so honest, he refused to sneak food into movie theaters.

If you had said that to my face, you'd have woken up in County Emergency.



73 Tom KI3R
" Robin " wrote in message
link.net...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3066833923


If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.

It's called "fightin' words". Free Speech isn't absolute. You stroll
through Compton screaming anti-black insults, you're going to get crunched,
First Amendment or no.

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 21:55:03 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:40:10 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


"garigue" wrote in message
news:lTmGb.32168$VB2.70624@attbi_s51...
Sounds like stolen government property to me .....

If you knew my relative, you would not accuse him of being a thief. He
was
a dedicated public servant. Decorated in the Air Force. Letters of
Commendation from every FBI director, from Hoover to Webster. Letters of
thanks from every SAC he served under. He was in the forefront in the
FBI's
fight against Communism, organized crime, and terrorism.

He was so honest, he refused to sneak food into movie theaters.

If you had said that to my face, you'd have woken up in County Emergency.



73 Tom KI3R
" Robin " wrote in message
link.net...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3066833923


If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.

It's called "fightin' words". Free Speech isn't absolute.


Close enough to absolute. The Supreme Court has not upheld a
conviction based on "fighting words" since 1942. You lose.

http://www.freedomforum.org/template...cumentID=13718



You stroll
through Compton screaming anti-black insults, you're going to get crunched,
First Amendment or no.

An outcome determined by lawbreakers in no way makes the
behavior legal. I hardly think your most honoorable relative would
condone such behavior by the residents of Compton or, more
pertinently, by you, even in defense of his own probity.

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 21:55:03 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:40:10 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


"garigue" wrote in message
news:lTmGb.32168$VB2.70624@attbi_s51...
Sounds like stolen government property to me .....

If you knew my relative, you would not accuse him of being a thief. He
was
a dedicated public servant. Decorated in the Air Force. Letters of
Commendation from every FBI director, from Hoover to Webster. Letters of
thanks from every SAC he served under. He was in the forefront in the
FBI's
fight against Communism, organized crime, and terrorism.

He was so honest, he refused to sneak food into movie theaters.

If you had said that to my face, you'd have woken up in County Emergency.



73 Tom KI3R
" Robin " wrote in message
link.net...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3066833923


If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.

It's called "fightin' words". Free Speech isn't absolute.


Close enough to absolute. The Supreme Court has not upheld a
conviction based on "fighting words" since 1942. You lose.

http://www.freedomforum.org/template...cumentID=13718



You stroll
through Compton screaming anti-black insults, you're going to get crunched,
First Amendment or no.

An outcome determined by lawbreakers in no way makes the
behavior legal. I hardly think your most honoorable relative would
condone such behavior by the residents of Compton or, more
pertinently, by you, even in defense of his own probity.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:40:10 GMT, " Robin "
wrote:


"garigue" wrote in message
news:lTmGb.32168$VB2.70624@attbi_s51...
Sounds like stolen government property to me .....

If you knew my relative, you would not accuse him of being a thief. He was
a dedicated public servant. Decorated in the Air Force. Letters of
Commendation from every FBI director, from Hoover to Webster. Letters of
thanks from every SAC he served under. He was in the forefront in the FBI's
fight against Communism, organized crime, and terrorism.

He was so honest, he refused to sneak food into movie theaters.

If you had said that to my face, you'd have woken up in County Emergency.



73 Tom KI3R
" Robin " wrote in message
link.net...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3066833923


If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.


I see that you are an uneducated dolt who cannot tell the
difference between "freedom" and "license". I suggest you
investigate that difference. When you report your results to us,
don't forget to mention Tom Paine and also Sra. Montisorri.

Also please stay off the air until you have learned the difference.

--

... Hank

Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:09:41 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.


I see that you are an uneducated dolt

Far from uneducated.

who cannot tell the
difference between "freedom" and "license". I suggest you
investigate that difference. When you report your results to us,
don't forget to mention Tom Paine and also Sra. Montisorri.

Thanks for the subltle references; However my legal position
remains correct.

Also please stay off the air until you have learned the difference.

At your behest??? And who made you the arbiter of who is
allowed to speak? The guy who puts people in the hospital for
impugning the family honor? Nice try.

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:09:41 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.


I see that you are an uneducated dolt

Far from uneducated.

who cannot tell the
difference between "freedom" and "license". I suggest you
investigate that difference. When you report your results to us,
don't forget to mention Tom Paine and also Sra. Montisorri.

Thanks for the subltle references; However my legal position
remains correct.

Your position was a legal one?
You are a lawyer?

Also please stay off the air until you have learned the difference.

At your behest??? And who made you the arbiter of who is
allowed to speak? The guy who puts people in the hospital for
impugning the family honor? Nice try.

I have the same "right" to speak my mind as you do.

Clearly you must be a lawyer, or at least pretend to be, otherwise
you would not have put that "allowed" in there. I didn't say anything
about what you are "allowed" to do or not.

When you fix that education problem,
add a course in reading comprehension.

Focus on "freedom" vs. "license" and "demand" vs. "request".

HNY!

--

... Hank

Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:35:12 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:09:41 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.


I see that you are an uneducated dolt

Far from uneducated.

who cannot tell the
difference between "freedom" and "license". I suggest you
investigate that difference. When you report your results to us,
don't forget to mention Tom Paine and also Sra. Montisorri.

Thanks for the subltle references; However my legal position
remains correct.

Your position was a legal one?
You are a lawyer?

I don't have to be a lawyer to understand (or state) that
battery in defense of a third party's honor in retaliation for
first-amendment-protected speech is illegal. It makes you a felon.


Also please stay off the air until you have learned the difference.

At your behest??? And who made you the arbiter of who is
allowed to speak? The guy who puts people in the hospital for
impugning the family honor? Nice try.

I have the same "right" to speak my mind as you do.

Clearly you must be a lawyer, or at least pretend to be, otherwise
you would not have put that "allowed" in there. I didn't say anything
about what you are "allowed" to do or not.

Clearly you're attempting to put words in my mouth.
Meaningless ones at that.

When you fix that education problem,
add a course in reading comprehension.

Focus on "freedom" vs. "license" and "demand" vs. "request".

Focus on anything you like -- I don't need either your
permission to speak or your childish attempt at directing my
education. All you are accomplishing is reinforcing the impression
that you find a felony to be acceptable behavior when faced with a
perceived slight.

On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:35:12 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:09:41 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.


I see that you are an uneducated dolt

Far from uneducated.

who cannot tell the
difference between "freedom" and "license". I suggest you
investigate that difference. When you report your results to us,
don't forget to mention Tom Paine and also Sra. Montisorri.

Thanks for the subltle references; However my legal position
remains correct.

Your position was a legal one?
You are a lawyer?

I don't have to be a lawyer to understand (or state) that
battery in defense of a third party's honor in retaliation for
first-amendment-protected speech is illegal. It makes you a felon.


Also please stay off the air until you have learned the difference.

At your behest??? And who made you the arbiter of who is
allowed to speak? The guy who puts people in the hospital for
impugning the family honor? Nice try.

I have the same "right" to speak my mind as you do.

Clearly you must be a lawyer, or at least pretend to be, otherwise
you would not have put that "allowed" in there. I didn't say anything
about what you are "allowed" to do or not.

Clearly you're attempting to put words in my mouth.
Meaningless ones at that.

When you fix that education problem,
add a course in reading comprehension.

Focus on "freedom" vs. "license" and "demand" vs. "request".

Focus on anything you like -- I don't need either your
permission to speak or your childish attempt at directing my
education. All you are accomplishing is reinforcing the impression
that you find a felony to be acceptable behavior when faced with a
perceived slight.

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:09:41 GMT, "Hank Oredson"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
If you'd commit battery on someone for exercising their
freedom of speech, you apparently learned nothing from your
scrupulously honest relative. I'm sure he'd be ashamed to have such a
brigand in the family.


I see that you are an uneducated dolt

Far from uneducated.

who cannot tell the
difference between "freedom" and "license". I suggest you
investigate that difference. When you report your results to us,
don't forget to mention Tom Paine and also Sra. Montisorri.

Thanks for the subltle references; However my legal position
remains correct.

Your position was a legal one?
You are a lawyer?

Also please stay off the air until you have learned the difference.

At your behest??? And who made you the arbiter of who is
allowed to speak? The guy who puts people in the hospital for
impugning the family honor? Nice try.

I have the same "right" to speak my mind as you do.

Clearly you must be a lawyer, or at least pretend to be, otherwise
you would not have put that "allowed" in there. I didn't say anything
about what you are "allowed" to do or not.

When you fix that education problem,
add a course in reading comprehension.

Focus on "freedom" vs. "license" and "demand" vs. "request".

HNY!

--

... Hank

Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net