Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Spectrum Scopes
My current HF rig is a Kenwood TS-570S. I'm very satisfied with it, but I
have an itch for a spectrum scope. I would like to hear comments from users of spectrum scopes, and recommendations for rigs with spectum scopes. I don't need the ultimate power-user DX rig, but I am willing to pay a premium for the scope feature. Bob ND9B |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Spectrum Scopes
I use an Icom Pro III. I didn't try to compare any of the rigs with "band
scopes" but having used real spectrum analyzers I was a bit disappointed that the band width (resoloution) was fixed, you could change the range of frequencies the sweep would span but there was also no way to change the sweep rate. To check any kind of close signals the indicator is worthless. It is also worthless to check the band spread of a signal. but then you have to pay big bucks for a real analyzer. It does show the abusers who tune up and dial across the whole ham band back and forth. Usually the over power limit hams with too much money for amps and not enough courtesy to be worth working.. IMHO/// I cant say for sure, but I would guess this would be a common short coming of all the "band scopes" cost being the factor for doing every thing a real analyzer does, They simply don't have the design to see what is shown for example transmitters with a spurious signal close to the desired frequency. That is the picture that is often show on spec' sheets. Google arrl spectrum analyzer display and wander around to view any display examples and most will not be the same as the band scope displays Good luck K4TWO Gary 73 "Bob D." wrote in message ... My current HF rig is a Kenwood TS-570S. I'm very satisfied with it, but I have an itch for a spectrum scope. I would like to hear comments from users of spectrum scopes, and recommendations for rigs with spectum scopes. I don't need the ultimate power-user DX rig, but I am willing to pay a premium for the scope feature. Bob ND9B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Spectrum Scopes
Mr Fed UP wrote in :
I use an Icom Pro III. I didn't try to compare any of the rigs with "band scopes" but having used real spectrum analyzers I was a bit disappointed that the band width (resoloution) was fixed, you could change the range of frequencies the sweep would span but there was also no way to change the sweep rate. To check any kind of close signals the indicator is worthless. It is also worthless to check the band spread of a signal. but then you have to pay big bucks for a real analyzer. It does show the abusers who tune up and dial across the whole ham band back and forth. Usually the over power limit hams with too much money for amps and not enough courtesy to be worth working.. IMHO/// I cant say for sure, but I would guess this would be a common short coming of all the "band scopes" cost being the factor for doing every thing a real analyzer does, They simply don't have the design to see what is shown for example transmitters with a spurious signal close to the desired frequency. That is the picture that is often show on spec' sheets. Google arrl spectrum analyzer display and wander around to view any display examples and most will not be the same as the band scope displays I thought about the problem myself a year or so ago, and spent $400 (more or less) on an SDR-IP Software-Defined Receiver from RFSpace Inc. It makes a rather nice bandscope and spectrum analyzer, though I'm limited to 190 KHz max bandwidth. It is nice to be able to see, say, all the CW portion of 80m or 40m or 17m or whatnot at a time Not a bad RX in other repects, too. -- Objective-C++: Trying to find out exactly how many wrongs _do_ make a right -- David Richerby |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Spectrum Scopes
Mr Fed UP wrote in :
I use an Icom Pro III. I didn't try to compare any of the rigs with "band scopes" but having used real spectrum analyzers I was a bit disappointed that the band width (resoloution) was fixed, you could change the range of frequencies the sweep would span but there was also no way to change the sweep rate. To check any kind of close signals the indicator is worthless. It is also worthless to check the band spread of a signal. but then you have to pay big bucks for a real analyzer. It does show the abusers who tune up and dial across the whole ham band back and forth. Usually the over power limit hams with too much money for amps and not enough courtesy to be worth working.. IMHO/// I cant say for sure, but I would guess this would be a common short coming of all the "band scopes" cost being the factor for doing every thing a real analyzer does, They simply don't have the design to see what is shown for example transmitters with a spurious signal close to the desired frequency. That is the picture that is often show on spec' sheets. Google arrl spectrum analyzer display and wander around to view any display examples and most will not be the same as the band scope displays I thought about the problem myself a year or so ago, and spent $400 (more or less) on an SDR-IQ Software-Defined Receiver from RFSpace Inc. It makes a rather nice bandscope and spectrum analyzer, though I'm limited to 190 KHz max bandwidth. It is nice to be able to see, say, all the CW portion of 80m or 40m or 17m or whatnot at a time Not a bad RX in other repects, too. -- Objective-C++: Trying to find out exactly how many wrongs _do_ make a right -- David Richerby |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Spectrum Scopes
"Bob D." wrote in message ... My current HF rig is a Kenwood TS-570S. I'm very satisfied with it, but I have an itch for a spectrum scope. I would like to hear comments from users of spectrum scopes, and recommendations for rigs with spectum scopes. I don't need the ultimate power-user DX rig, but I am willing to pay a premium for the scope feature. Bob ND9B Hi Bob, The newer 7800, 7700 and 7600 have variable sweep rates and much better RBW- 100Hz on the 7600 I recall. The best solution is to buy the SDR-IQ and the IF-2000 board and tap off before the PRO NB Dale W4OP |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Spectrum Scopes
Dale Parfitt wrote:
"Bob D." wrote in message ... My current HF rig is a Kenwood TS-570S. I'm very satisfied with it, but I have an itch for a spectrum scope. I would like to hear comments from users of spectrum scopes, and recommendations for rigs with spectum scopes. I don't need the ultimate power-user DX rig, but I am willing to pay a premium for the scope feature. Bob ND9B Hi Bob, The newer 7800, 7700 and 7600 have variable sweep rates and much better RBW- 100Hz on the 7600 I recall. The best solution is to buy the SDR-IQ and the IF-2000 board and tap off before the PRO NB The band scope is a pretty cool addition within it's limitations. It certainly isn't a spectrum analyzer, but then that isn't what it is designed for. They are handy for seeing activity mostly. The IC-756 III is a really nice one. The top end rigs with scopes have some more features, but what a price tag. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Scopes | Equipment | |||
FS:Scopes | Boatanchors | |||
Manswl Scopes | Equipment | |||
Manswl Scopes | Equipment | |||
FS O-Scopes | Swap |