Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about the dipole? I have a 1:1 balun and both ladder line and coax.
Which is prefered? If you want to work a wide range of bands with a single center-fed doublet, I think you'll have more success using ladder-line, and feeding directly from the balanced output of your tuner. If your tuner has only a non-balanced (coaxial) output, I'd suggest using a 1:1 choke (current balun") as close as is practical to the tuner output, and then transitioning over to ladder line. If you're using coax, and a balun at the top, you may find yourself suffering from significant losses in the coax at high SWRs. Using ladder or open-wire line, with its higher characteristic impedance, can reduce these excess losses quite a bit (although not entirely eliminate them). Are you firm about using a center-fed doublet/dipole? A number of people I know are very positive about their "off-center-fed" dipoles... these can work as coax-fed antennas (using a 4:1 or 6:1 balun at the feedpoint) on a set of harmonically-related bands (e.g. 80/40/20/10). Another option here is to use an off-center-fed wire, but feed it with ladder line (no balun at the feedpoint)... gives even more band coverage. These OCF antennas are typically fed at a point around 2/3 of the way along the length (e.g. one arm is around twice the length of the other) and are cut to a length which is halfwave-resonant on the lowest band being used. An example is the Alpha Delta DC-OCF - 135 feet long (legs are 45 and 90 feet), 6:1 balun at the feedpoint, coax-fed, covers 80/40/20/ 17/12/10 meters "No tuner required". It covers the lower end of 6 meters pretty well, and the higher frequencies with an increased SWR ("use with caution", presumably to avoid overstressing the balun and transmitter). Most of these doublet/dipole antennas can also be treated as a top-loaded vertical, and fed Marconi-style (short the two sides of the feedline together, connect to the "hot" side of the tuner, and feed the ground side of the tuner to a good bed of radials). This can let you work lower-frequency bands (e.g. 160) on an antenna that by itself is too short to load up properly at such a low frequency. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need advice | Equipment | |||
Asking for advice | Antenna | |||
JRC NRD-545 advice please! | Shortwave | |||
Amp advice | General | |||
Amp advice | Policy |