LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old March 17th 14, 07:10 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Default Quad shield coax & dielectric?

On 3/17/2014 12:09 PM, Rob wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/17/2014 10:45 AM, Rob wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/16/2014 11:42 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Jerry Stuckle
writes





HDTV requires a stronger signal than the old NTSC.

It really depends on how good your old analogue NTSC was. For a
noiseless picture, you would need around 43dB CNR, but pictures were
still more-than-watch-able at 25dB, and the picture was often still
lockable at ridiculously low CNRs (when you certainly wouldn't bother
watching it). Digital signals can work at SNRs down to around 15dB for
64QAM and 20dB for 256QAM (although if it's a little below this, and you
will suddenly get nothing).



That has not been our experience. We had a number of customers here in
the DC area who had great pictures on NTSC sets, but got either heavy
pixilation or no picture at all when the switchover occurred. We sent
them to a company which does tv antenna installations (we do a lot of
low voltage, including tv - but not antennas). In every case,
installing a better outdoor antenna solved the problem.

Most likely the company reduced the transmitted power by a factor
of 10 at the time of the switchover, to put the added link margin
in their own pockets.
(transmitting a megawatt of ERP as was regular in the analog days
puts a serious dent in your electricity bill, even when you have
a lot of antenna gain)


Not at all. If anything, they raised their power.


Here they went from 1 megawatt to about 50 kilowatt (ERP).
And then there are several programmes on one transponder, instead
of one analog programme. This gives significant savings in power.


OK, you mean absolute power. Yes, they can lower the ERP - but that
does not necessarily lower the power for the signal. Remember at 1MW
the power was spread over 4.25 Mhz (assuming video only, of course).
Digital requires much less bandwidth, so they don't need as much power
to get the same effective signal. However, digital still requires a
stronger signal than analog, in the bandwidth provided. You need quite
a bit of noise before it becomes visible in analog. Digital, a single
noise pulse can cause the loss of several bits of information. Because
of the compression involved, this is more than one or two pixels.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Connecting coax shield to tower near top Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T) Antenna 3 July 19th 07 06:57 AM
High Quality {Low Noise} Coax Cable for Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antennas ? - - - Why Not Quad-Shield RG6 ! RHF Shortwave 0 December 25th 06 07:22 PM
soldering coax shield Tam/WB2TT Equipment 11 March 23rd 04 12:05 PM
soldering coax shield Tam/WB2TT Homebrew 10 March 23rd 04 12:05 PM
soldering coax shield Tam/WB2TT Homebrew 0 March 20th 04 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017