| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/17/2014 12:09 PM, Rob wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 3/17/2014 10:45 AM, Rob wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 3/16/2014 11:42 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Jerry Stuckle writes HDTV requires a stronger signal than the old NTSC. It really depends on how good your old analogue NTSC was. For a noiseless picture, you would need around 43dB CNR, but pictures were still more-than-watch-able at 25dB, and the picture was often still lockable at ridiculously low CNRs (when you certainly wouldn't bother watching it). Digital signals can work at SNRs down to around 15dB for 64QAM and 20dB for 256QAM (although if it's a little below this, and you will suddenly get nothing). That has not been our experience. We had a number of customers here in the DC area who had great pictures on NTSC sets, but got either heavy pixilation or no picture at all when the switchover occurred. We sent them to a company which does tv antenna installations (we do a lot of low voltage, including tv - but not antennas). In every case, installing a better outdoor antenna solved the problem. Most likely the company reduced the transmitted power by a factor of 10 at the time of the switchover, to put the added link margin in their own pockets. (transmitting a megawatt of ERP as was regular in the analog days puts a serious dent in your electricity bill, even when you have a lot of antenna gain) Not at all. If anything, they raised their power. Here they went from 1 megawatt to about 50 kilowatt (ERP). And then there are several programmes on one transponder, instead of one analog programme. This gives significant savings in power. OK, you mean absolute power. Yes, they can lower the ERP - but that does not necessarily lower the power for the signal. Remember at 1MW the power was spread over 4.25 Mhz (assuming video only, of course). Digital requires much less bandwidth, so they don't need as much power to get the same effective signal. However, digital still requires a stronger signal than analog, in the bandwidth provided. You need quite a bit of noise before it becomes visible in analog. Digital, a single noise pulse can cause the loss of several bits of information. Because of the compression involved, this is more than one or two pixels. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Connecting coax shield to tower near top | Antenna | |||
| High Quality {Low Noise} Coax Cable for Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antennas ? - - - Why Not Quad-Shield RG6 ! | Shortwave | |||
| soldering coax shield | Equipment | |||
| soldering coax shield | Homebrew | |||
| soldering coax shield | Homebrew | |||