Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Davis" wrote in message
... On 3/6/2015 1:12 PM, gareth wrote: "John Davis" wrote in message ... On 2/25/2015 5:37 PM, gareth wrote: Here is your big chance to prove your superiority of knowledge about the super-regrenerative method, but you've gone strangely silent, which is a bit bizarre when you consider how many times you have oft repeated your childish sneer? Perhaps you will listen to the voice of expierence. My first receiver was a Knight Kit Star Roamer.. now this is a superhet, true, but as it turns out it had a REGEN control in one stage, that stage could be made super regenerative,, You used this to receive CW or SSB,, i used that radio for many years. I fear that you will be incorrect and confusing regeneration and super-regeneration. No... I'm not.... I do know the difference. Had a Super Regen for VHF as well. So, if the Knight Kit could also go into super-regeneration, how was the quenching achieved? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, gareth wrote:
"John Davis" wrote in message ... On 3/6/2015 1:12 PM, gareth wrote: "John Davis" wrote in message ... On 2/25/2015 5:37 PM, gareth wrote: Here is your big chance to prove your superiority of knowledge about the super-regrenerative method, but you've gone strangely silent, which is a bit bizarre when you consider how many times you have oft repeated your childish sneer? Perhaps you will listen to the voice of expierence. My first receiver was a Knight Kit Star Roamer.. now this is a superhet, true, but as it turns out it had a REGEN control in one stage, that stage could be made super regenerative,, You used this to receive CW or SSB,, i used that radio for many years. I fear that you will be incorrect and confusing regeneration and super-regeneration. No... I'm not.... I do know the difference. Had a Super Regen for VHF as well. So, if the Knight Kit could also go into super-regeneration, how was the quenching achieved? By the same means it happened by accident when Armstrong was playing with regen receivers. Most discussion of superregens has the same tube doing the receiving and quenching. That tends to confuse the operation of the scheme, and like I said, eventually the ARRL Handbook description of the superregen devolved to explaining how the tube could quench. The right components and that regen receiver can be a superregen receiver. And like I said, it can be both, just picking components so the regen control can get some regeration (for improved selectivity), turn into an oscillator (for beating against incoming signals) and then a bit more and it goes into superregeneration. Like I said, superregeneration is just an addition to regeneration, a useful feature since it makes operation much less fussy (no need to constantly ride the regen control), but nevertheless just an extension of the basic concept of regeneration. Michael |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1503161526020.18553@darkstar. example.org... Like I said, superregeneration is just an addition to regeneration, a useful feature since it makes operation much less fussy (no need to constantly ride the regen control), but nevertheless just an extension of the basic concept of regeneration. So, let's say that you are listening to a weak CW signal, you turn up the regen control until you get super-regen, at which point the CW signal disappears because the CIO effect has now been shifted out to the sidebands created by the quenching? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.equipment gareth wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1503161526020.18553@darkstar. example.org... Like I said, superregeneration is just an addition to regeneration, a useful feature since it makes operation much less fussy (no need to constantly ride the regen control), but nevertheless just an extension of the basic concept of regeneration. So, let's say that you are listening to a weak CW signal, you turn up the regen control until you get super-regen, at which point the CW signal disappears because the CIO effect has now been shifted out to the sidebands created by the quenching? Nope. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regener...ative_receiver -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|