Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe the original poster wanted to know how to create a dipole. If you want to make a dipole
with a vertical configuration, you have to use a method which keeps the radiators vertical and the feedline horizontal for some part of a wavelength. Try this: Make a TEE shaped assembly of PVC pipe using a TEE connector, one piece of PVC about one metre long and two pieces of PVC about 25 centimeters long. The longer pipe mounts horizontally and the shorter pipes are oriented vertically. Cement all the pieces into the TEE. Strip the outer jacket off a length of RG58 about 20 inches from the end. Make an opening in the braid next to the outer jacket and pull the center conductor through so that the braid and center conductor are sepatate. Push the RG58 into the long pipe and make the center conductor bend up into the upper vertical PVC and pull the braid down through the lower vertical PVC. If necessary, prune the center conductor and braid for best SWR, but the SWR should probably be low enough as is. -ken- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I get it, and then maybe once it's all set, I could put end-caps on the top
and the bottom of the vertical segment to keep it dry. Maybe it would be good to put in some kind of fastener, too, holding the flexible braid immobile against the interior of the downward-pointing vertical segment --- before the installation of the end-caps, obviously. I like it --- simple but effective. But does the horizontal segment have to be an entire meter, though? I think I can remeber seeing those T-like, FM antennas mounted on large towers but with horizontal segments that were shorter than a meter --- I think they were slightly shorter than the vertical segments. -- 73 Tom H VA7FAB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 17-Mar-2005, "tom" wrote: I get it, and then maybe once it's all set, I could put end-caps on the top and the bottom of the vertical segment to keep it dry. Maybe it would be good to put in some kind of fastener, too, holding the flexible braid immobile against the interior of the downward-pointing vertical segment --- before the installation of the end-caps, obviously. Yes, I omitted those refinements as sort of obvious. But does the horizontal segment have to be an entire meter, though? I think I can remeber seeing those T-like, FM antennas mounted on large towers but with horizontal segments that were shorter than a meter --- I think they were slightly shorter than the vertical segments. I chose the one meter length arbitrarily so that it would be about a half wave. The idea is that the feedline should be kept at right angles to the radiator for some distance. A coil of coax where the feedling exits the PVC might be a good idea to reduce coupling. 73, -ken- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the idea of the coiled-feedline balun is to prevent the outer braid from
turning into a radiating element, wouldn't it be preferable to position the coils in the feedline next to the antenna feedpoint instead of at the opposite end of the horizontal segment? Or would there be harmfull, inductive coupling to the the coils if they were that close to the feedpoint? Also, if one were to use a ferrite-bead type balun (not the type that the feedline is wrapped around) instead of a coiled-feedline type balun, do you think it would it be necessary to have electrical contact between the ferrite-bead and the outer braid (necessitating stripping the outer insulation)? -- 73 Tom H VA7FAB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom, you are making this waaaay too complicated. Just solder up a
ground plane on an SO-239, hook a coax to it and start transmitting. You don't even need welding rod. I have used coat hanger wire in the past. Forget about baluns, beads and inductive coupling. We're not launching a spacecraft here. Keep it simple. Dick - W6CCD On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:17:24 GMT, "tom" wrote: If the idea of the coiled-feedline balun is to prevent the outer braid from turning into a radiating element, wouldn't it be preferable to position the coils in the feedline next to the antenna feedpoint instead of at the opposite end of the horizontal segment? Or would there be harmfull, inductive coupling to the the coils if they were that close to the feedpoint? Also, if one were to use a ferrite-bead type balun (not the type that the feedline is wrapped around) instead of a coiled-feedline type balun, do you think it would it be necessary to have electrical contact between the ferrite-bead and the outer braid (necessitating stripping the outer insulation)? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||
Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna |