Hi Larry,
I intentionally posted the very same identical mage twice since there was
no damage and no change in the image even had I taken one after the storm
cleared. There was no damage here at all to the station in any way.

I NEVER realized my photographic prowess would cause such a stir which
included accusations of "misrepresentation" "spoofing" "nice try" and
comments about my "**** tower" "crappy installation" etc. I was even
ridiculed for not "being in the eye of the hurricane". Gee maybe next time I
can request a 200 mph cat 5 hurricane to plow through my backyard.

Be that as it may since human nature and the heart of man are such I simply
wanted to show that there was absolutely no damage.


So to "prove" there was no damage here is a link to a snap I just took of
the tower. Geesh Louise......
1. http://deepsouthnet.net/images/100_5512.jpg

--

Charlie
Deep South 2 Meter SSB Net
www.deepsouthnet.net





"Larry" wrote in message
...
Charlie wrote:
In all honesty to those that ridiculed the tower and it's associated
riggings etc...I have posted photos of the damage incurred from the
category 4 hurricane Dennis. I never expected this kind of result...live
and learn I suppose. Here is the direct link..

1. http://deepsouthnet.net/storm_damage.html


Charlie, there is only one photo on that web page, shown twice. Do you
have a photo of any damage you took after the storm? I could not find one
in http://deepsouthnet.net/images/.

73
N1POP

On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:24:01 -0500, "Charlie" wrote:

Hi Larry,
I intentionally posted the very same identical mage twice since there was
no damage and no change in the image even had I taken one after the storm
cleared. There was no damage here at all to the station in any way.


I think the problem was that the thread was titled, AD5TH Tower -
Storm Damage Photos. So naturally we all assumed that there was storm
damage and you were going to show us the damage in the picture.
Apparently, you were trying to show something entirely different.
That the storm DIDN'T damage the tower. Perhaps you should have
titled it, "AD5TH Tower Escapes Storm Damage Photos." It would have
been easier to understand what you were trying to convey, and none of
these negative comments would have been triggered. Glad everything is
OK.

Dick - W6CCD

Charlie wrote:
Hi Larry,
I intentionally posted the very same identical mage twice since there was
no damage and no change in the image even had I taken one after the storm
cleared. There was no damage here at all to the station in any way.

Good to hear, Charlie, and thanks for the clarification.

I NEVER realized my photographic prowess would cause such a stir which
included accusations of "misrepresentation" "spoofing" "nice try" and
comments about my "**** tower" "crappy installation" etc.

I remind myself that we are amateurs, after all. As such, we might do
things differently from professionals or self-proclaimed professionals.

I also remind myself that this is Usenet, and it attracts all sorts of
opinions and posting styles. Not all of them are worth reading or replying.

73
N1POP