Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick" LeadWinger wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:45:26 -0400, "Jerry" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. Dick Oh, I agree totally. It is why I made SURE there were no such things. To my mind, if you do your research carefully BEFORE you buy, it ain't a problem. I simply was not going to HAVE anyone telling me that, if my car broke down and it sat there for awhile, but not "derelict", that I would have to move it. If you pick carefully, the economic factors will keep "riff raff" out of a neighborhood; zoning and general city ordinances will take care of the rest. In my city, if you let your grass grow over a certain height, the city will come and cut it and charge you $100. Few people ever allow that to happen! I simply refuse to knuckle under to ANY HOA or covenant-restricted community, nor will I tolerate some busybody coming on MY land and telling me what color I can paint my door, or how many antennas I can put up. I am a quiet, non-obtrusive man, I keep my yard and house presentable, I mind my own business; you would scarcely know I am there. But nobody is going to regulate what happens on my property beyond reasonable safety and esthetics. I just happen to feel VERY strongly about HOA's. If somebody tried to start an HOA, I would REFUSE to join it (street maintenance is what I pay taxes for!). If they start mouthing off to me about it, then they'd best go home and, well......just be quiet. I'm having NO part of HOA's. ![]() 73 Jerry K4KWH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1419 Â October 22, 2004 | General | |||
ARNewsline 1358 - Aug 22 2003 | Dx | |||
ARNewsline 1358 - Aug 22 2003 | Dx |