Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:43:06 -0400, "Percival P. Cassidy"
wrote: On 09/14/05 04:25 pm Dick tossed the following ingredients into the ever-growing pot of cybersoup: As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. It's all very well to tell people not to buy houses with CC&Rs and HOAs, but probably anything recent (last 20 years or so) has them. I've read that the financial institutions that fund the developments insist on them; they may not dictate every detail, but I think there are "model rules" around that the developers copy, and these rules just about require an application in triplicate 3 months in advance before you can get permission to sneeze. Perce And twelve months advaance notice to stay at home after having a baby. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1419 Â October 22, 2004 | General | |||
ARNewsline 1358 - Aug 22 2003 | Dx | |||
ARNewsline 1358 - Aug 22 2003 | Dx |