Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: (Dave Platt) wrote in : They think you shouldn't have to be proficient at anything to have a ham radio license. Nonsense. That's an illogical conclusion on your part, and _not_ something which has been stated, or can reasonably be inferred from the postings that I have seen in these threads. OK then, Since we all want to be proficient, how about this: I am reading Step 1: No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all elements required for their license class. not the worst idea but unlikely to be put in place Step 2: The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%. why? again not the worst idea but why bother Step 3: Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. and why is it that you hate the ARS? Step 4: Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. since this wold kill the ars within a single renwal cycle your proposal would kill off the ARS n 10 years or less why do you hate the ARS SC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another License Idea | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |