Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified:
Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring customers? Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with antenna required to be recertified by law? What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions? Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
"harvey" wrote in message ... On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified: "Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of the requirements set forth by the FCC. Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring customers? Possibly, depending upon the type of device. What "number" specifically? Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with antenna required to be recertified by law? Not if you did it yourself and have no intention of marketing it. "Certification" or "Type acceptance" is basically used for mass marketing letting the public know that the device does meet the minimal requirements. What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions? Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
richard wrote: "harvey" wrote in message ... On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified: "Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of the requirements set forth by the FCC. WHO GIVES A ****?? Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring customers? Possibly, depending upon the type of device. What "number" specifically? Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with antenna required to be recertified by law? Not if you did it yourself and have no intention of marketing it. "Certification" or "Type acceptance" is basically used for mass marketing letting the public know that the device does meet the minimal requirements. What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions? Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
an old friend wrote:
and I And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to you. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
"richard" wrote in
: now, do you have an answer to my question (or are you just playing ganes-if you're a lawyer, then I can understand the word games)? more inline: "harvey" wrote in message ... On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified: "Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of the requirements set forth by the FCC. Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring customers? Possibly, depending upon the type of device. What "number" specifically? FCC ID the number needed to determine IF in fact radio has been certified. It is required to be placed visible on the radio, but are vendors required to supply the number on request? Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with antenna required to be recertified by law? Not if you did it yourself and have no intention of marketing it. But if a company modifies the radio including addition of high power antenna, it has to be recertified AFAIU. "Certification" or "Type acceptance" is basically used for mass marketing letting the public know that the device does meet the minimal requirements. also used to make sure the radio meets max. power requirements as set by the FCC. What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions? Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: and I And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to you. I grant you Nice of you to surrender. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
wrote: an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: and I And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to you. I grant you Nice of you to surrender. no surrender no retreat you ran off from nimbusters I see |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
FCC legal question
an old freind wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: and I And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to you. I grant you You surrender to your superiors? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
an update on Stevie | Policy | |||
MONEY FAST AND LEGAL | CB |