Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
On 12 Aug 2006 15:49:50 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 09:57:19 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: it is not a sign sign of any superior knowledge to know that is a particular circut is Collpitts or hartley ocilator It's a sign of having learned it. a sign of havigng learned something of NO value No value to you - that doesn't matter very much to the other 6 billion+ people on the planet. You still don't understand the difference between memorizing facts and memorizing answers. at pesent their is no different To you - which was what I said. for some of the materail the only rational way of approuching it is memorization For some, yes. I'm referring to those who use the method for all the answers - people like you. , for other section you can learn some part of the underlying theroy and use it but short of the Full course of Eltromatic Theroy I hadin colledge you don't learn much I doubt you learned much in college either. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 15:49:50 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 09:57:19 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: it is not a sign sign of any superior knowledge to know that is a particular circut is Collpitts or hartley ocilator It's a sign of having learned it. a sign of havigng learned something of NO value No value to you - that doesn't matter very much to the other 6 billion+ people on the planet. You still don't understand the difference between memorizing facts and memorizing answers. at pesent their is no different To you - which was what I said. for some of the materail the only rational way of approuching it is memorization For some, yes. I'm referring to those who use the method for all the answers - people like you. , for other section you can learn some part of the underlying theroy and use it but short of the Full course of Eltromatic Theroy I hadin colledge you don't learn much I doubt you learned much in college either. He went to clown college. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. but indeed enlight me what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is colpitss type or hartley Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no understanding of it. nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things Since you know neither, it's a distinction without a difference for you. why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as long as it ocilates at the right freq? Oh, maybe you'd care to know why it's microphonic? Or what to look for if it starts doing something wrong? Different circuits are prone to different problems. your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement And yours doesn't, I suppose. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB.It already does around here mostly silent
STFU MORON! WHO **** CARES
Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. but indeed enlight me what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is colpitss type or hartley Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no understanding of it. nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things Since you know neither, it's a distinction without a difference for you. why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as long as it ocilates at the right freq? Oh, maybe you'd care to know why it's microphonic? Or what to look for if it starts doing something wrong? Different circuits are prone to different problems. your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement And yours doesn't, I suppose. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0633-1, 08/15/2006 Tested on: 8/15/2006 8:29:36 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0633-1, 08/15/2006 Tested on: 8/15/2006 8:30:10 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. agred in practice but you are the one going about therory .. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
an old friendless cocksucker wrote: Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. agred in practice but you are the one going about therory What the hell would you know, you are a no code beginner training wheel ham who makes up EME contacts. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
You're not a real ham if you want the ARS to sound like CB. It already does around here mostly silent
wrote: cease and desist your harrassment |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Sound Effects Libraries For Sale! | Equipment | |||
RCI 2950 No sound from speaker | CB | |||
Record Real Media Stream | Broadcasting | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |