Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "kony" wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:48:32 -0800, "Dana" wrote: You man there actually is something which will detect MP3 recorders? There are devices that can detect when electronic devices are being used. There are devices that can be made that can detect almost any known material If said mp3 player is made of that material it can be detected. Which is not entirely applicable, since plenty of non-recorders are made of circuit boards, ICs & other discretes, and some plastic. Cell phone and pager are two quite common ones. And what is a common item to circuit boards, IC's, cell phones, pagers, MP3 players, etc. There are devices made to detect the presence of semiconductors, and these have been out for ages. And now with the war on terror going on, you would not believe what kind of sensors they are coming up with. Minor modifications of some of these units would not be very difficult to detect a mere MP3 in someones pocket. But then these would not be cheap either, if you can even get one. Detecting electronics devices in general, is it useful? We dont know the exact scenario, what the result would be of a positive detection but as above, cell phones and pagers would tend to be caught and are going to be far more common and innocuous than a recording device, though in the former case, the phone may have recording capability too. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:15:03 -0800, "Dana"
wrote: "kony" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:48:32 -0800, "Dana" wrote: You man there actually is something which will detect MP3 recorders? There are devices that can detect when electronic devices are being used. There are devices that can be made that can detect almost any known material If said mp3 player is made of that material it can be detected. Which is not entirely applicable, since plenty of non-recorders are made of circuit boards, ICs & other discretes, and some plastic. Cell phone and pager are two quite common ones. And what is a common item to circuit boards, IC's, cell phones, pagers, MP3 players, etc. Yes, which is one of the reasons why detection of these won't help, unless ALL such devices are banned which is unlikely... but again, we dont have the specific scenario to consider. There are devices made to detect the presence of semiconductors, and these have been out for ages. And now with the war on terror going on, you would not believe what kind of sensors they are coming up with. I would believe you are taking a random unfounded presumption that someone "could" be possible without supporting evidence, nor consideration of what would be necessary to distinguish this particular device. Minor modifications of some of these units would not be very difficult to detect a mere MP3 in someones pocket. Unfounded speculation. "Maybe" it's easy enough to detect the device when turned off. "Probably" if you were close enough to the device you could even detect that it's turned on. That's a far cry from identification as an MP3 player, let alone one that is recording, vs another mode of operation (like playback, wouldn't it be highly possible someone who has an MP3 player, would have it to play MP3?) But then these would not be cheap either, if you can even get one. Establish that such a device exists at all, that can detect an MP3 player recording, specifically discriminate it from other devices. Nevermind if we can buy it or how much it costs, establish that it can be done at all as so far you have not. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "kony" wrote in message ... On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:15:03 -0800, "Dana" wrote: "kony" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:48:32 -0800, "Dana" wrote: You man there actually is something which will detect MP3 recorders? There are devices that can detect when electronic devices are being used. There are devices that can be made that can detect almost any known material If said mp3 player is made of that material it can be detected. Which is not entirely applicable, since plenty of non-recorders are made of circuit boards, ICs & other discretes, and some plastic. Cell phone and pager are two quite common ones. And what is a common item to circuit boards, IC's, cell phones, pagers, MP3 players, etc. Yes, which is one of the reasons why detection of these won't help, unless ALL such devices are banned which is unlikely... but again, we dont have the specific scenario to consider. Depends on the OP, his office can ban those items in the work place. The point remains they are detectable. There are devices made to detect the presence of semiconductors, and these have been out for ages. And now with the war on terror going on, you would not believe what kind of sensors they are coming up with. Minor modifications of some of these units would not be very difficult to detect a mere MP3 in someones pocket. Unfounded speculation. Nope. But then these would not be cheap either, if you can even get one. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:42:49 -0800, "Dana"
wrote: The point remains they are detectable. You mean the point you never made. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "kony" wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:42:49 -0800, "Dana" wrote: The point remains they are detectable. You mean the point you never made. Electronic devices made the point. They exist, you may not be aware of them, but that is your issue. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:37:24 -0800, "Dana"
wrote: "kony" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:42:49 -0800, "Dana" wrote: The point remains they are detectable. You mean the point you never made. Electronic devices made the point. They exist, you may not be aware of them, but that is your issue. It's not my issue to claim detection of different devices proves detection of an MP3 player recording. Rather, it is your burden to be specific with the claim that it's possible by showing even one reproducible example. We have no reason to believe a scenario like the OP has (too vaguely) posed, would allow identification of a device as an MP3 player that is recording. Identifying the existence of "some" kind of device, then a search uncovering this device and a physical examination to determine that it is recording (looking at the screen or lights) is another matter. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "kony" wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:37:24 -0800, "Dana" wrote: "kony" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:42:49 -0800, "Dana" wrote: The point remains they are detectable. You mean the point you never made. Electronic devices made the point. They exist, you may not be aware of them, but that is your issue. It's not my issue to claim detection of different devices proves detection of an MP3 player recording. I never said it can detect an MP3 player recording. I said it can detect an MP3 player, or pretty much anything electronic. We have no reason to believe a scenario like the OP has (too vaguely) posed, Actually what he needs is a device to scan for electronic devices, and they exist already. How the OP handles the knowledge of such sweeps depends on him. He can either ask for the people to remove all electronic devices, or he can watch what he says. would allow identification of a device as an MP3 player that is recording. Not recording, but its existence. Its existence can be determined, and it does not have to be on, as there are devices that look for semiconductor junctions(pretty much any electronic device that has at least a diode in it). Identifying the existence of "some" kind of device, then a search uncovering this device and a physical examination to determine that it is recording (looking at the screen or lights) is another matter. True, but the OP would know there is some kind of elctronic device on the person that may be capable of recording. How the OP uses that info is up to him. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Oct 2006, kony wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:37:24 -0800, "Dana" wrote: [...] It's not my issue to claim detection of different devices proves detection of an MP3 player recording. Rather, it is your burden to be specific with the claim that it's possible by showing even one reproducible example. We have no reason to believe a scenario like the OP has (too vaguely) posed, would allow identification of a device as an MP3 player that is recording. Identifying the existence of "some" kind of device, then a search uncovering this device and a physical examination to determine that it is recording (looking at the screen or lights) is another matter. I can clarify whatever you are unsure about if it helps. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices | Shortwave | |||
Roger Wiseman's Greyhound Men's Room Band | General |