Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "max" wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:13:43 -0500, Mitch Crane -three wrote: max wrote in : On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:22:57 -0500, Mitch Crane -three wrote: Joey wrote in : You say, "search them physically"? I have to tell you that I don;'t work in the sort of environment where that kind of behaviour is considered acceptable! Would an all nude work environment be acceptable? It would make hiding such devices difficult so you wouldn't have to do anything untoward like searching people. You'd be surprised where people can hide things: http://www.dailymotion.com/blog/vide...yuv3g7lzul2w64 rs1iaad00kom8c0ii3&play=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fsus iebright.blogs.com Caution! NSFW! Sure, but I don't think the MP3 recorder would work very well in there, so the point is moot. Don't see why not - it's a solid state device. Disguise a little mic as a labial piercing stud, run the wire up the folds, and it's very unlikely anyone would inspect it closely enough to figure it out, even if it were visible behind the bush. Having the recorder embedded would help reduce what little detectable EMI a low power device like that give off, and the mic wire would only carry audio freqs, which don't transmit very far at those power levels. You just have to think outside the box a bit. max At which point a cavity search would have to be done ![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices | Shortwave | |||
Roger Wiseman's Greyhound Men's Room Band | General |