Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joey" wrote in message ... On 13 Oct 2006, wrote: Joey wrote: On 11 Oct 2006, Aly wrote: Joey wrote in message ... [...] Sorry for my rather unhelpful reply, I'm having one of my moments where I only talk to microcontrollers. No problems. Seriously though. There's very little in world that's so important. I've worked with people that would *record* meetings thinking they were of vital importance when in actual truth, no one could care less. I guess it would just cause people to be more careful about what they say. I'm unable to view those videos you've supplied as this is a development machine without any clutter on it. eBay could be a good place to buy such things though. All sorts of stuff comes out of the AsiaPac. This is to document something quite serious. Are you the trying to be the documenter, or trying to avoid being the documentee? Or both? I don't want to be recorded. But I would like to know if I can be detected if I do attempt to make a recording. Your last sentence is why "kony" won't get his "make&model" for such a detector. Or any more of a technical description than I have given him, of how they work. I note that he isn't supplying the "Make&Model" of his undetectable MP3 Recorder. He provides an argument that no such detector could exist, based totally on his theories of what is possible, but then complains that no one will provide him with more than a basic theoretical description of the workings of a device, that its makers, sellers (usually the same people) and users, don't want working details generally available. Counter-surveillance devices are like alarm systems, you don't want to tell anyone the details of how one works. No one, who knows, is going to provide "kony" the "proof" he is demanding. Luck; Ken |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recording the back of my scanner ... weird voices | Shortwave | |||
Roger Wiseman's Greyhound Men's Room Band | General |