On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:20:47 -0400, "if you say so"
wrote:

The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with
just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF
LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow
FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people
already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over
anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even
past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove
you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules.
that would serve the interests of the ars

OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his
license

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

wrote in message
...
OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his
license.

That is true.

The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following
the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he
doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread
hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with
higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them
down.

"past"
Spelling?

"if you say so" wrote in message
...
The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone
with just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL
HF LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to
follow FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not
the people already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO
priority over anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency.
Have you even past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until
you can prove you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules.

"SHb" wrote in
:

"past"
Spelling?

"if you say so" wrote in message
...
The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone
with just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for
ALL HF LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want
to follow FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move
not the people already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you
have NO priority over anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving
frequency. Have you even past a ham test? Maybe your license should be
revoked until you can prove you have read and fully understand the part
97 FCC rules.



He's a product of dumbed down licensing. In schools they call it outcome
based education.

SC

"I PUNCE" wrote in
oups.com:


Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!

Dee, N8UZE


I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that
doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand
all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to
take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down
more.

SC

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:44:39 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"I PUNCE" wrote in
roups.com:


Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!

Dee, N8UZE


I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that
doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand
all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to
take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down
more.
she is a Procdoer SC

BTw you post plenty of Hom crap yourself

but you realy hate all other hams it seems

SC
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
"I PUNCE" wrote in
oups.com:


Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!

Dee, N8UZE


I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that
doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand
all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to
take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down
more.

SC

1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts.

2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in control of
the testing policy.

3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary
skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with derogatory
comments.

We can all do our part to create good hams.

Dee, N8UZE

"Dee Flint" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
"I PUNCE" wrote in
oups.com:


Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!

Dee, N8UZE


I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that
doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to
stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung
around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio
dumbed down more.

SC

1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts.

2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in
control of the testing policy.

3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary
skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with
derogatory comments.

We can all do our part to create good hams.

Dee, N8UZE


I read everything, even Mark in the Dark's gibberish.

SC

In article , deeflint01
@comcast.net says...

"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
"I PUNCE" wrote in
oups.com:


Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.

SC

Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra.


didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking
fat whore!

Dee, N8UZE


I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that
doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand
all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to
take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down
more.

SC

1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts.

2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in control of
the testing policy.

3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary
skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with derogatory
comments.

We can all do our part to create good hams.

Dee, N8UZE



That was a GREAT post!!!!!!!

Thanks for your good attitude,

Chris (a new ham)

I might propose that to the FCC.

20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and
no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority.


I agree. I HATE when I have finishing a contact and some calls me at 5 WPM
when I was operating at 20 plus. I dont even respond.