| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Landlords
|
Landlords
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code"
wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. |
Landlords
"Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. An even better experience would be, buy a home with your own money and rent it to those that think "Landlords suck assholes" After a few missed rent payments your outlook will suddenly change, you will wonder why does that %^&$#^$ think I should support him. It's not my fault he lost a job, got fired, car broke down, had to take the kid to the emergency room. It's not my fault he didn't save any money for a rainy day! My most fun story is the guy that replaced a mailbox, he was in the middle of being kicked out. He went out and bought a $40 mailbox expecting me to pay for it. I told him to keep the mailbox. When he left he took the mailbox. The post for this mailbox was a buried telephone pole, it wasn't going anywhere. When I installed my new $5.00 mailbox I mounted a 2"x6" board to the pole with 5" x 5/16" lag bolts, then I mounted the mailbox to the 2x6 with seven 3 1/4" drywall screws. I would have liked to seen his face when he whacked that mailbox and it didn't go flying away. I hope he didn't hurt himself, NOT He was gone about three days before he did this. I waited another week and put up a new mailbox. Mike PS. One day the toilet overflowed I had to remove about 40 kotex from the sewer pipe one cold day in January. PSS. sold all the rentals no more %^&$#^$ to put up with. |
Landlords
Pedro:
That is one way to attack the problem. Another is simply go the stealth route, I find it immensely more amusing ... JS "Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. |
Landlords
John Smith wrote:
Another is simply go the stealth route, ... I get it. The landlord doesn't even notice a stealth antenna being shoved up his posterior. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Landlords
wrote in message ups.com... Slow Code wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 1 Dec 2006 02:12:02 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: apearntly not What's "apparent" is your incompetence with the English language, fatboy. you have spent 8 years harrassing bascial for daring to be different than you No, I've been rubbing your nose in your lying and misconduct. Even yoiu admit to the legal investigations being conducted against you, yet you act as if it's my fault...Stop being an abusing deviate and the cops will go away...Maybe you won't have to keep trying to move farther and farther away to avoid the long arm of the law. steve their are investgatons because you by you own admission made complaints to various agentcies Morkie, those "investgations" occured due to some reason OTHER than me filing a complaint, and they started WAAAAAAAAAAAAY before I even knew you existed. I FOUND THE EVIDENCE OF YOU BEING INVESTIGATED AND THREW IT OUT FOR YOU TO BITE ON! You couldn't resist! HOOK LINE AND SINKER! Just like "Slow Code" said...YOU CAN'T HELP YOURSELF! Your own propensity to let your ego overrun your common sense "outted" you, fatboy! You keep doing it to yourself...over and over and over and over..... Idiot. Steve, K4YZ Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( You must have a ****ing piece-of-**** HD Radio that requires you to mount a dipole antenna on the roof ! Shows how stupid you are I don't have an HF license I'm a no code technichan. |
Landlords
"Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Do you like a dirty sanchez? I give a great blumpkin. |
Landlords
Cecil:
You leave me speechless, and busting a gut! Warmest regards, JS "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . .. John Smith wrote: Another is simply go the stealth route, ... I get it. The landlord doesn't even notice a stealth antenna being shoved up his posterior. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Landlords
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "amdx" wrote in message ... "Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. This is increasingly becoming a pipe dream, as more and more neighborhoods put together ******* CCA's or whatever they call them this week, and dictate what color paint you can have on your home, what sort of topiary, and countless other minutia. Covenant communities should be outlawed. Whatever happened to a man's home being his castle (i.e. personal property rights)? out here in the great hinterland... more than an hour drive from any of the great 'blue' cities. you can still find land that is wild and free, where neighbors help you put up towers instead of putting them down, and the big question at a zoning bylaw hearing is if the new bylaw is meant to stop celular companies from coming into town... the question was asked because the person didn't want the bylaw to slow them down, because they couldn't get service now and wanted it! |
Landlords
"Slow Code" wrote in
: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 1 Dec 2006 02:12:02 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: apearntly not What's "apparent" is your incompetence with the English language, fatboy. you have spent 8 years harrassing bascial for daring to be different than you No, I've been rubbing your nose in your lying and misconduct. Even yoiu admit to the legal investigations being conducted against you, yet you act as if it's my fault...Stop being an abusing deviate and the cops will go away...Maybe you won't have to keep trying to move farther and farther away to avoid the long arm of the law. steve their are investgatons because you by you own admission made complaints to various agentcies Morkie, those "investgations" occured due to some reason OTHER than me filing a complaint, and they started WAAAAAAAAAAAAY before I even knew you existed. I FOUND THE EVIDENCE OF YOU BEING INVESTIGATED AND THREW IT OUT FOR YOU TO BITE ON! You couldn't resist! HOOK LINE AND SINKER! Just like "Slow Code" said...YOU CAN'T HELP YOURSELF! Your own propensity to let your ego overrun your common sense "outted" you, fatboy! You keep doing it to yourself...over and over and over and over..... Idiot. Steve, K4YZ Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( My landlord was a no-code ham and he didn't want me to have an antenna because he didn't want me to have fun making CW contacts, so I slapped the **** out of him and now I have a 5 element tri-bander up 100 feet and I made him pay for it. I told him I'm not paying anymore rent until he learns CW, so I got him learning code now too. SC |
Landlords
Brenda Ann wrote:
Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Landlords
That went away with all the other rights such as the right to use a
telephone without fear of the government listening in (without a court order) and losing your pilot license if a neighbor gets ****ed at you for something and calls homeland security and says you're a threat (no due process in that case, they just automatically yank it I'm told). Very sad to see such abuse of power. I think everyone should vote every elected official out at the next opportunity. Let's start with a clean slate and make the lousy reps get regular jobs like the rest of us. Scott Brenda Ann wrote: Whatever happened to a man's home being his castle (i.e. personal property rights)? |
Landlords
Scott wrote: That went away with all the other rights such as the right to use a telephone without fear of the government listening in (without a court order) and losing your pilot license if a neighbor gets ****ed at you for something and calls homeland security and says you're a threat (no due process in that case, they just automatically yank it I'm told). Very sad to see such abuse of power. I think everyone should vote every elected official out at the next opportunity. Let's start with a clean slate and make the lousy reps get regular jobs like the rest of us. You're full of ****. dxAce Michigan USA |
Landlords
Yeah, I believe THAT one ;) I don't know any landlords that would be
scared of you and fall for that crap. When I was a landlord, that wouldn't fly. No rent check? Get that refrigerator box and set up behind Wal Mart you lowlife slug. My landlord was a no-code ham and he didn't want me to have an antenna because he didn't want me to have fun making CW contacts, so I slapped the **** out of him and now I have a 5 element tri-bander up 100 feet and I made him pay for it. I told him I'm not paying anymore rent until he learns CW, so I got him learning code now too. SC |
Landlords
I know I am. What's that got to do with my opinion that I stated?
And people like you (I assume you say I'm full of **** for wanting to vote out deadbeats) keep voting the useless crumbs back into office, year after year. I will clarify a bit though...yes you still have a right to own your own home. You just might not be able to use it for what you want (does Michigan require land use permits?) If I want to put a private use runway on my property I have to get a permit and the county sends letters to all adjoining property owners to see if there are objections. To me, my airplane is a recreational vehicle. Why doesn't the county send me a letter to see if I object to neighbors using THEIR recreational vehicles (snowmobiles, ATV, etc.) running them up and down behind my house at 2AM when the bars let out? Scott dxAce wrote: Scott wrote: That went away with all the other rights such as the right to use a telephone without fear of the government listening in (without a court order) and losing your pilot license if a neighbor gets ****ed at you for something and calls homeland security and says you're a threat (no due process in that case, they just automatically yank it I'm told). Very sad to see such abuse of power. I think everyone should vote every elected official out at the next opportunity. Let's start with a clean slate and make the lousy reps get regular jobs like the rest of us. You're full of ****. dxAce Michigan USA |
Landlords
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "amdx" wrote in message ... "Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. This is increasingly becoming a pipe dream, as more and more neighborhoods put together ******* CCA's or whatever they call them this week, and dictate what color paint you can have on your home, what sort of topiary, and countless other minutia. Covenant communities should be outlawed. Whatever happened to a man's home being his castle (i.e. personal property rights)? It's called contract law. Two or more parties agree to exchange something of value and usually there are other stipulations the parties agree to. I would never agree to a CCA . My home is my castle. Ace - WH2T "Live free or die." |
Landlords
"Dave" wrote in message . .. "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "amdx" wrote in message ... "Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. This is increasingly becoming a pipe dream, as more and more neighborhoods put together ******* CCA's or whatever they call them this week, and dictate what color paint you can have on your home, what sort of topiary, and countless other minutia. Covenant communities should be outlawed. Whatever happened to a man's home being his castle (i.e. personal property rights)? out here in the great hinterland... more than an hour drive from any of the great 'blue' cities. you can still find land that is wild and free, where neighbors help you put up towers instead of putting them down, and the big question at a zoning bylaw hearing is if the new bylaw is meant to stop celular companies from coming into town... the question was asked because the person didn't want the bylaw to slow them down, because they couldn't get service now and wanted it! I choose to live far enough out that I can pretty much do as I please . I can fire a gun , or whatever in my front yard and no nosy neighbor is going to call the police. Also I don't need to ask permission or get a zoning variance to erect an antenna . I lived in town for 12 years . Never again . Ace - WH2T Everyone starts out ignorant. It is only through time, experience, and making mistakes that people develop knowledge. |
Landlords
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message . .. Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil is correct . The economic laws of supply and demand dictate that when consumers wise up and refuse to give up their liberties, covenant communities will be as obsolete as the horse and buggy. Ace - WH2T P.S. I read about the evils of drinking, So I gave up reading. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Landlords
"Scott" wrote in message ... That went away with all the other rights such as the right to use a telephone without fear of the government listening in (without a court order) and losing your pilot license if a neighbor gets ****ed at you for something and calls homeland security and says you're a threat (no due process in that case, they just automatically yank it I'm told). Very sad to see such abuse of power. I think everyone should vote every elected official out at the next opportunity. Let's start with a clean slate and make the lousy reps get regular jobs like the rest of us. Scott Brenda Ann wrote: Whatever happened to a man's home being his castle (i.e. personal property rights)? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force. And, like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. -George Washington "You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe." -John Adams. Need I say more ? Ace - www.WH2T.com |
Landlords
dxAce wrote: Scott wrote: That went away with all the other rights such as the right to use a telephone without fear of the government listening in (without a court order) and losing your pilot license if a neighbor gets ****ed at you for something and calls homeland security and says you're a threat (no due process in that case, they just automatically yank it I'm told). Very sad to see such abuse of power. I think everyone should vote every elected official out at the next opportunity. Let's start with a clean slate and make the lousy reps get regular jobs like the rest of us. You're full of ****. dxAce Michigan USA "Scott" wrote in message ... I know I am. What's that got to do with my opinion that I stated? And people like you (I assume you say I'm full of **** for wanting to vote out deadbeats) keep voting the useless crumbs back into office, year after year. I will clarify a bit though...yes you still have a right to own your own home. You just might not be able to use it for what you want (does Michigan require land use permits?) If I want to put a private use runway on my property I have to get a permit and the county sends letters to all adjoining property owners to see if there are objections. To me, my airplane is a recreational vehicle. Why doesn't the county send me a letter to see if I object to neighbors using THEIR recreational vehicles (snowmobiles, ATV, etc.) running them up and down behind my house at 2AM when the bars let out? Scott Scott, I agree with you . I bet "dxAce" is so full of it he has brown eyes . Non illigitamus carborundum . Ace - www.WH2T.com |
Landlords
Thanks Ace...
I guess one of my buttons got pushed...I just think it's such a shame that people in general (and I'm guilty of it too) just look the other way at "bad government" and let elected officials get away with the stuff they do. I mean, how many of us would get to break laws at work and not get fired? MAYBE government would get better if elected officials actually feared voters? 2 cents worth... Scott "Scott" wrote in message ... I know I am. What's that got to do with my opinion that I stated? And people like you (I assume you say I'm full of **** for wanting to vote out deadbeats) keep voting the useless crumbs back into office, year after year. I will clarify a bit though...yes you still have a right to own your own home. You just might not be able to use it for what you want (does Michigan require land use permits?) If I want to put a private use runway on my property I have to get a permit and the county sends letters to all adjoining property owners to see if there are objections. To me, my airplane is a recreational vehicle. Why doesn't the county send me a letter to see if I object to neighbors using THEIR recreational vehicles (snowmobiles, ATV, etc.) running them up and down behind my house at 2AM when the bars let out? Scott Scott, I agree with you . I bet "dxAce" is so full of it he has brown eyes . Non illigitamus carborundum . Ace - www.WH2T.com |
Landlords
Cecil Moore wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Yup - as long as those consumers know what they are getting into. In more than a few places, the buyer doesn't know a house has covenants unless they ask exactly the right questions and insist on the answers in writing. Many folks live in houses with very restrictive covenants without ever realizing it, because they don't do anything that violates the covenants. One of the ironies of all this is that covenanted properties tend to appreciate in value more slowly than unrestricted ones. This makes them less expensive - and more popular with buyers. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Landlords
wrote:
Many folks live in houses with very restrictive covenants without ever realizing it, because they don't do anything that violates the covenants. When I bought my present house, the real estate agent had no idea about any restrictions concerning this property. After a lot of digging they were uncovered. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Landlords
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Many folks live in houses with very restrictive covenants without ever realizing it, because they don't do anything that violates the covenants. When I bought my present house, the real estate agent had no idea about any restrictions concerning this property. After a lot of digging they were uncovered. Hopefully not literally! The real kicker in all of this is the buyer who doesn't know the right questions to ask, and how to evaluate the answers. A verbal statement by the agent, owner or anybody else is worthless when confronted by legally recorded covenants in black-and-white. These questions have to be asked up-front - preferably before even looking at a property. Always remember that RE agents don't make any money until a sale closes. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Tenants suck!
Evict the welfare *******.
"amdx" wrote in message ... "Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. An even better experience would be, buy a home with your own money and rent it to those that think "Landlords suck assholes" After a few missed rent payments your outlook will suddenly change, you will wonder why does that %^&$#^$ think I should support him. It's not my fault he lost a job, got fired, car broke down, had to take the kid to the emergency room. It's not my fault he didn't save any money for a rainy day! My most fun story is the guy that replaced a mailbox, he was in the middle of being kicked out. He went out and bought a $40 mailbox expecting me to pay for it. I told him to keep the mailbox. When he left he took the mailbox. The post for this mailbox was a buried telephone pole, it wasn't going anywhere. When I installed my new $5.00 mailbox I mounted a 2"x6" board to the pole with 5" x 5/16" lag bolts, then I mounted the mailbox to the 2x6 with seven 3 1/4" drywall screws. I would have liked to seen his face when he whacked that mailbox and it didn't go flying away. I hope he didn't hurt himself, NOT He was gone about three days before he did this. I waited another week and put up a new mailbox. Mike PS. One day the toilet overflowed I had to remove about 40 kotex from the sewer pipe one cold day in January. PSS. sold all the rentals no more %^&$#^$ to put up with. |
Landlords
Brenda Ann wrote: "amdx" wrote in message ... "Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. This is increasingly becoming a pipe dream, as more and more neighborhoods put together ******* CCA's or whatever they call them this week, and dictate what color paint you can have on your home, what sort of topiary, and countless other minutia. Generally neighborhoods don't put them together. Homeowners associations and the related CCR's found in the deed are usually required by either city or county planning commissions as a tradeoff for denser than normal housing in planned communities. With those restrictions you usually get community open space and some level of community recreation facilities, etc. Whether they are good or bad or something in-between really depends on what you want in your locality. Some of us enjoy the freedom to do more-or-less what ever we want with our house. Along with that right comes the responsibility to acccept whatever your next-door-neighbor does with his house. About 10 miles away is a community with out a HOA that is composed of 80 year old well maintained brick or wood colonial houses. One guy has painted his brick home contrasting colors of purple, pink and blue. Another puts fills up most of his yard with at least 100 beatup plastic santas and other xmas paraphernalia. And yet a third house has a very large oak that was chainsaw sculpted to look like a 30 foot nude with huge breasts and 2 large branches made into arms extended open toward the house. And these are neighborhoods with houses that sell for $900,000 and up. I would prefer to not have stuff like that next door and am willing to trade off the right to paint my mailbox any color. Covenant communities should be outlawed. Why should they be outlawed? If you don't like them just move to a location where there isn't a home owners association. Whatever happened to a man's home being his castle (i.e. personal property rights)? What specifically are personal property rights. I have yet to find the locality where you can do anything you want on your property. |
Landlords
"Scott" wrote in message .. . Yeah, I believe THAT one ;) I don't know any landlords that would be scared of you and fall for that crap. When I was a landlord, that wouldn't fly. No rent check? Get that refrigerator box and set up behind Wal Mart you lowlife slug. I hear SC has a side-by-side box, by far the nicest abode behind Wal-Mart. |
Tenants suck!
Tenants do indeed suck. Take John Griffin for instance.
He's always late with the rent and when he does get it together on last day before eviction notices go out, he pays it lots of small dirty bills that have been God knows where. Even though the lease stipulates NO PETS, John raises gerbils and collects toilet paper tubes. Have you ever smelled gerbil ****? Then there are the overnight guests who never leave. John's trailer comfortably accomodates four. But between his mom's tricks and his loser friends, there's always at least ten folks there clogging up the septic system. Parking is always an issue. In addition to John's **** brown '76 Pacer the above mentioned hangers-on park their assorted trucks, old cabs and pre 80's GM sedans with torn vinyl roofs in such a manner that the short bus that John rides to the special school district can't get through. |
Landlords
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message t... wrote: Many folks live in houses with very restrictive covenants without ever realizing it, because they don't do anything that violates the covenants. When I bought my present house, the real estate agent had no idea about any restrictions concerning this property. After a lot of digging they were uncovered. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Then I suggest, your agent sucks, your title company sucks, and your closing agent sucks. To be enforceable, conveants must be a matter of record and real estate professionals have an obligation to search the records. |
Landlords
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:54:45 -0600, "amdx" wrote:
"Pedro Sanchez" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:06:20 -0500, "Slow Code" wrote: Hey Steve, does your landlord let you put up an antenna? Mine won't. :-(( Shove those antenna up the landlords ass. Ask him if he would rather have the antenna in the air or up his ass. If he says he wants it up his ass then break it off for him. Landlords suck assholes. Gee, maybe you should save your money and buy your OWN home, then you can do what you want with it. An even better experience would be, buy a home with your own money and rent it to those that think "Landlords suck assholes" After a few missed rent payments your outlook will suddenly change, you will wonder why does that %^&$#^$ think I should support him. It's not my fault he lost a job, got fired, car broke down, had to take the kid to the emergency room. It's not my fault he didn't save any money for a rainy day! My most fun story is the guy that replaced a mailbox, he was in the middle of being kicked out. He went out and bought a $40 mailbox expecting me to pay for it. I told him to keep the mailbox. When he left he took the mailbox. The post for this mailbox was a buried telephone pole, it wasn't going anywhere. When I installed my new $5.00 mailbox I mounted a 2"x6" board to the pole with 5" x 5/16" lag bolts, then I mounted the mailbox to the 2x6 with seven 3 1/4" drywall screws. I would have liked to seen his face when he whacked that mailbox and it didn't go flying away. I hope he didn't hurt himself, NOT He was gone about three days before he did this. I waited another week and put up a new mailbox. Mike PS. One day the toilet overflowed I had to remove about 40 kotex from the sewer pipe one cold day in January. PSS. sold all the rentals no more %^&$#^$ to put up with. So, you're saying you like/defend suck-asshole asshole landlords? or what? |
Landlords
Cecil Moore wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. Tough to do, today. In a number of states, Illinois being one, new developments are required to have HOA's with a standard, boilerplate CC&R statement provided by the Assembly for simplicity. Pre-existing non HOA communities are forming HOA's to protect themselves from intrusion by commercial interests that cannot get traction in other HOA communities. AND...in at least two counties, here, there are basic CC&R's in place on undeveloped land, levied by county boards, in speculation that developers may wish to move that way. Meaning, you can buy a piece of land in deep weeds, build a home with your own hands, and before you close the door, be in violation of antenna restrictions. Even though the nearest neighbor may be an hour away. Rejecting HOA communities, today, may mean having to move a half a continent away. You can't even homestead property on the tundra, anymore. |
Landlords
D Peter Maus wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. Tough to do, today. In a number of states, Illinois being one, new developments are required to have HOA's with a standard, boilerplate CC&R statement provided by the Assembly for simplicity. when did Illinois do that Pre-existing non HOA communities are forming HOA's to protect themselves from intrusion by commercial interests that cannot get traction in other HOA communities. AND...in at least two counties, here, there are basic CC&R's in place on undeveloped land, levied by county boards, in speculation that developers may wish to move that way. Meaning, you can buy a piece of land in deep weeds, build a home with your own hands, and before you close the door, be in violation of antenna restrictions. Even though the nearest neighbor may be an hour away. glad I left the state a few years back Rejecting HOA communities, today, may mean having to move a half a continent away. You can't even homestead property on the tundra, anymore. well I hard live in tunadra and your tendecy for hyperbole makes me question the accuratcy of what you are saying |
Landlords
an_old_friend wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. Tough to do, today. In a number of states, Illinois being one, new developments are required to have HOA's with a standard, boilerplate CC&R statement provided by the Assembly for simplicity. when did Illinois do that That's a good question. I don't believe it was in place when I bought my house eleven years ago. But I've been hearing it now for a number of years from sources within both the real estate community, and media. Pre-existing non HOA communities are forming HOA's to protect themselves from intrusion by commercial interests that cannot get traction in other HOA communities. AND...in at least two counties, here, there are basic CC&R's in place on undeveloped land, levied by county boards, in speculation that developers may wish to move that way. Meaning, you can buy a piece of land in deep weeds, build a home with your own hands, and before you close the door, be in violation of antenna restrictions. Even though the nearest neighbor may be an hour away. glad I left the state a few years back You are not alone in that sentiment. And I'm not far behind you. |
Landlords
D Peter Maus wrote:
Rejecting HOA communities, today, may mean having to move a half a continent away. Texas ain't full yet. Y'all come on down. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Landlords
Cecil Moore wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Rejecting HOA communities, today, may mean having to move a half a continent away. Texas ain't full yet. Y'all come on down. Hmmm. Rumor, in Calif, is that the illegal aliens squatters have all the land! Chuckling, JS |
Landlords
D Peter Maus wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. Tough to do, today. In a number of states, Illinois being one, new developments are required to have HOA's with a standard, boilerplate CC&R statement provided by the Assembly for simplicity. SNIPPED If the CC&R is "provided by the Assembly" is that to be understood as an agency of government? |
Landlords
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Covenant communities should be outlawed. Actually, all that is needed is for consumers to reject covenant communities, as I have always done. Tough to do, today. In a number of states, Illinois being one, new developments are required to have HOA's with a standard, boilerplate CC&R statement provided by the Assembly for simplicity. SNIPPED If the CC&R is "provided by the Assembly" is that to be understood as an agency of government? The Assembly is an agency of government, yes. The boilerplate CC&R's provided, as I've read them, are provided as a guideline. Local HOA's are free to amend them as necessary, or as desired. Or to create CC&R's of their own. There are in a number of states, now--Maryland and Delaware among them--agencies of government which, at least in theory, oversee the operations of HOA's within the state, and are the authority to which residents may appeal cases of malfeasance, or abuse. In Maryland, this agency has relatively broad powers, and works quite effectively at bringing errant HOA's into compliance. In other states...not so. In many states, HOA's, and their oversight agencies, are not aware of the federal exemption protecting TV and small dish antennae, Ham and CB antennae, and--at least in the opinion of a couple of FCC Commissioners--shortwave receiving antennae. It's up to the homeowner to keep current of the regs, rulings and opinions of FCC regarding antennae for radio hobbycraft. These may be the homeowner's only weapons when the issue becomes heated on the front lawn. There is a growing number of books out there, today, regarding the gathering nightmare of HOA abuse, offering accurate information state by state, and remedies in the event of abuse. Do a websearch. There's a LOT of information out there. |
Landlords
D Peter Maus wrote:
SNIPPED If the CC&R is "provided by the Assembly" is that to be understood as an agency of government? The Assembly is an agency of government, yes. The boilerplate CC&R's provided, as I've read them, are provided as a guideline. Local HOA's are free to amend them as necessary, or as desired. Or to create CC&R's of their own. There are in a number of states, now--Maryland and Delaware among them--agencies of government which, at least in theory, oversee the operations of HOA's within the state, and are the authority to which residents may appeal cases of malfeasance, or abuse. In Maryland, this agency has relatively broad powers, and works quite effectively at bringing errant HOA's into compliance. In other states...not so. In many states, HOA's, and their oversight agencies, are not aware of the federal exemption protecting TV and small dish antennae, Ham and CB antennae, and--at least in the opinion of a couple of FCC Commissioners--shortwave receiving antennae. It's up to the homeowner to keep current of the regs, rulings and opinions of FCC regarding antennae for radio hobbycraft. These may be the homeowner's only weapons when the issue becomes heated on the front lawn. There is a growing number of books out there, today, regarding the gathering nightmare of HOA abuse, offering accurate information state by state, and remedies in the event of abuse. Do a websearch. There's a LOT of information out there. Your response goes right to the point. If the HOA is from a government entity the PRB-1 exemption should be claimed and defended prior to purchase. |
Landlords
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: SNIPPED If the CC&R is "provided by the Assembly" is that to be understood as an agency of government? The Assembly is an agency of government, yes. The boilerplate CC&R's provided, as I've read them, are provided as a guideline. Local HOA's are free to amend them as necessary, or as desired. Or to create CC&R's of their own. There are in a number of states, now--Maryland and Delaware among them--agencies of government which, at least in theory, oversee the operations of HOA's within the state, and are the authority to which residents may appeal cases of malfeasance, or abuse. In Maryland, this agency has relatively broad powers, and works quite effectively at bringing errant HOA's into compliance. In other states...not so. In many states, HOA's, and their oversight agencies, are not aware of the federal exemption protecting TV and small dish antennae, Ham and CB antennae, and--at least in the opinion of a couple of FCC Commissioners--shortwave receiving antennae. It's up to the homeowner to keep current of the regs, rulings and opinions of FCC regarding antennae for radio hobbycraft. These may be the homeowner's only weapons when the issue becomes heated on the front lawn. There is a growing number of books out there, today, regarding the gathering nightmare of HOA abuse, offering accurate information state by state, and remedies in the event of abuse. Do a websearch. There's a LOT of information out there. Your response goes right to the point. If the HOA is from a government entity the PRB-1 exemption should be claimed and defended prior to purchase. Absolutely. But how many really know about that exemption going in? And frankly, how many really think about this issue when the realtor is throwing around numbers? You would. I would. There are others here who would. But by and large, no. Home buyers, as a group do not consider this issue when making the purchase. Preferring to bitch after the fact. Then, again, most HOA's that I've gotten to deal with have been absolutely unwilling to both answer questions or provide copies of bylaws and regulations to which they hold homeowners responsible. One former member, here--who worked at VOA for years, is an active ham and SWL--lived under the shadow of an HOA which refused to provide him a copy of the bylaws, even after a ruling in his favor by the Maryland HOA oversight agency. You're right. Exemptions and unlawful restrictions SHOULD be claimed and defended prior to purchase. It doesn't happen. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com