wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007 19:17:47 -0800, "KC4UAI" wrote:



I would not expect that any of this would be "in play" in a new group.
Read the proposed criteria and decide for yourself. I for one don't
intend to be heavy handed in the moderation. Stay on topic and be
respectful to others and I'm not going to reject your posts.

I do expect it play it has too ingrained in this gruop to expect it is
going away anytime soon

but somebody else can and indeed how will I even know it was done?

again I ask and have received no answer how does the process of
rejection occour and how will I know about it has happend given the
time between anything being sient to me about the offical comment gruop
and time they were sent I hav e to wonder how timely such a response
will be

snip Nowhere does the proposed policy list "disagreement with the
moderator's personal views" as grounds for rejection of posts.

so what? your moderator are indeed stil human

Thus the appeals process. I don't expect that we will always get it
100% right the first time, but I hope we can keep things in the center
of the road most of the time by getting a number of folks all looking
at it objectively.

which work HOW? I certainly see nothing that tells how I will know a
post has been rejected or why or anything on how this apeals process
is suposed to work

again how is this suposed to work how can anyone be assured it will
occour in a timely manner