Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
Bob Brock wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:44:45 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:36:30 -0500, Bob Brock wrote: please try this gruop agin in few months the Procder are through crying and NoCoder are still waiting the very end of the matter I am curious and doing reasearch on wether there is colaration of being for or against this NG and ones stance on code testing I respectly ask if you were either ProCode or Nocode or none of the above I thank esp if you satisfy my curiousity 73 I am one of those that were alleged not to exist. I've waited for over 10 years for code to go away before I would upgrade. However, I decided that, rather than waste time here, my efforts would be better spent actively trying to drag ham radio into the 20th century. thank you for indulging me in my curousity That being said. I see no benefit to a moderated group and would not participate in one. Self-moderation by all sides would go a long ways. Establishing a moderated newsgroup on policy defeats it's own purpose of providing open discussion. I see a few benifits and might post in one to see if they are worthwhile but I am dubios myself Perhaps those who control the Big 8 will feel the same as myself. Perhaps they won't. Either way, it's of no real consequence since I have no interest in subscribing to such a newsgroup. again thank you for answering my question 73 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Were the moderated newsgroup proponents just blowing smoke? | Policy | |||
VOTE, Moderated or Free Speech? | Policy | |||
Conversion To Moderated Group | Policy |