Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups - Was: RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote: Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor. Marc, KD5LUR [this followup directed only to rram and rrap] The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated. Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol. So Loyd is a moderator... The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of following directions. ...and already the "you people" remarks start. Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8 Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news groups, and that should help immeasurably. Help with what? But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a moderated group. That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. Should rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which cannot be vandalized by his kind. Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be tolerated? There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio community. So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative comment in news.groups.proposals. Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals, you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call "thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there. Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of this groups problem. Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups - Was: RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
Tex wrote: Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'. It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging, thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
wrote in message ps.com... Tex wrote: Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'. It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging, thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck. Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these groups, save for yourself perhaps. Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of realizing that. Mark is rude. He is thoughtless. Robesin didn't cause that. I could touch on Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
Roger Leo wrote: wrote in message ps.com... Tex wrote: Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'. It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging, thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck. Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these groups, save for yourself perhaps. Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of realizing that. Thanks for not forging the attribute chain in your response. I appreciate it. Mark is rude. He is thoughtless. Robesin didn't cause that. I could touch on Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there? Sure, Mark has dyslexia. Too bad. Robesin was the catalyst for many of the problems in this group. If he had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist..., and instead sues Mark (Mark is still waiting to be served). His mental stability has been the focus of numerous postings. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: If he had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist... Nobody, including you and me, can prove that he is not a rapist. It's simply a fact of logic. The "he" that I used there did not refer to Mark. It was meant as an impersonal "he" which includes me. I cannot prove that I am not a rapist. It is generally impossible to prove a negative. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bad followups
Roger Leo wrote: wrote in message ps.com... Tex wrote: Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'. It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging, thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck. Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these groups, save for yourself perhaps. Thanks, but Mark has no reason to "out-asshole" me. I think his bedroom preferences are off-topic in an amateur radio news group, and have no idea why anyone would go out to the web and bring something like that back here. Mark will talk ham radio with you if you like, or we can go on talking about why this newsgroup has become all about Robesin. Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of realizing that. I might have agreed with you except that I have seen Robesin viciously attack other people on RRAP, myself included. Now I have no disagreement with any method used to control Robesin. But thanks for asking. Mark is rude. He can be, but so can I. Ditto you. He is thoughtless. Actually, no. Robesin has deeply hurt Mark. An apology is in order. Robesin didn't cause that. Sure he has. I could touch on Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there? Dyslexia is not a mental illness. Mark is fine when he's not being made fun of or being accused of lyng or rape. Try treating Mark as a human being and he will respond in kind. If you respect yourself it will be a lot easier to respect other people. Best of Luck. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Were the moderated newsgroup proponents just blowing smoke? | Policy | |||
VOTE, Moderated or Free Speech? | Policy | |||
Conversion To Moderated Group | Policy |