Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
John, I don't see a serious problem with Paul considering your quote or anything else that I've seen so far. Let's see... He clearly says that we are not going to require a specific licence class to be a moderator. That seems fair. So Where's the beef in your quote? I can tell you that nobody in the team even noticed that we all where extras until Mark brought it up. So to my knowledge that was not a pre- condition for acceptance in the team. I do recall that they needed to be Hams, but that seems reasonable. I was there from the start of this, being responsible for setting up the mail reflector we use as well as setting up the shell account we use for the moderation software, so I should know. It seems to me that you guys just oppose the creation of the moderated group and you have chosen to engage in personal attacks on the proponents in an effort to keep it from happening. This is the best you can do? Do you have any real evidence here? -= KC4UAI =- On Jan 28, 12:39 am, John Smith I wrote: To Whom It May Concern: Just so you have a complete picture of Paul W. Schleck, I took the following from one of his posts in news.groups.proposals: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Antenna | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Boatanchors | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Homebrew | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Homebrew | |||
David Icke - Total Schlock | Shortwave |