"Roger Gt" wrote:

Gee it hurts when the shoe is on
the other foot. That is what you
were doing with what I said,
jumping to conclusions about
what I said. (snip)


I didn't jump to any conclusions. Instead, I simply questioned the exact
words you posted to this newsgroup.


You did not ask, you assumed!


See the last paragraph below.


It is different when your ox is gored.


Man, you're not at all in touch with reality. No ox of mine was gored. I
openly volunteered the information, as I have done many times in these
newsgroups over the years.


You should not be so quick to criticize
others when they do what your have
been indulging in all along!


Initially, any criticism was in your own head. I simply questioned the
story given. You grew defensive when it became obvious that I wasn't going
to accept your story as offered. At that point, you began to change and
embelish the story to make it more believable. But, in my view, those very
changes and embellishments only made the story less believable (the truth
rarely changes).


But you didn't ask for more details, you
criticized taking immense leaps of faith at
what you THOUGHT I had said!


I specificially asked you when and where the incident took place. If you
continue to deny that (as you've now done twice in this message), I'll post
an exact quote of those words too. Otherwise, I've had my say, with nothing
more needed to be said, so will therefore let this entire discussion drop at
this point. Take care, Roger.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/