RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.radiobanter.com/general/)
-   -   Asshole Cop (https://www.radiobanter.com/general/25276-re-asshole-cop.html)

core_dump December 7th 03 11:34 PM

Asshole Cop
 
(DooDahMan) wrote in :

So this asshole cop pulls me over today and starts asking me why I
have a scanner in my car. I tell him it's a hobby and that NJ state
scanner law states that having a scanner in your vehicle is not
illegal unless it's used for commiting a crime or evading police.
Which is true. It's says so right he

That wasn't good enough for that asshole, so after he writes me for
not having a seat belt on, he tells me that the "NJ scanner law stuff
is hogwash" and that unless I'm a tow truck driver, EMT, fire
fighter....(insert own bull****) that I can't have it in my car and
that he has 30 days to decide if he wants to charge me with the crime
of having it in my car.

What should I do? I know for a fact that it's not illegal and this
asshole harrassed me just cuz he was bored i suppose.


Wasn't this exact message posted once before? It seems awfully familiar.

--
-core_dump
Registered Linux User #334094 http://counter.li.org

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/M/CC d- s-:+ a--- C+++ UL+ P L++++ E--- W++(--) N+++ o? K? w(--)
O? M-(--) V? PS+(---) PE(++) Y+ PGP- t+ 5? X+ R tv b+ DI+ D+(---) G e h!
r-- y--*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Jim Shaffer, Jr. December 7th 03 11:34 PM

On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:40:38 GMT, (DooDahMan) wrote:

So this asshole cop pulls me over today and starts asking me why I have a
scanner in my car. I tell him it's a hobby and that NJ state scanner law
states that having a scanner in your vehicle is not illegal unless it's used
for commiting a crime or evading police. Which is true. It's says so right
he

http://www.siscanner.8m.com/laws.html

and he

http://www.maxpages.com/frequencies/NJ_Laws

and he

http://www.fordyce.org/scanning/scan...o/nj-laws.html

That wasn't good enough for that asshole, so after he writes me for not
having a seat belt on, he tells me that the "NJ scanner law stuff is
hogwash" and that unless I'm a tow truck driver, EMT, fire
fighter....(insert own bull****) that I can't have it in my car and that he
has 30 days to decide if he wants to charge me with the crime of having it
in my car.


Well, what do you expect from someone so ****ing stupid that he can live with
himself for enforcing seatbelt laws? Victimless crimes should be abolished.
The "people" enforcing such laws are robots, not human beings.




ex-patBrit December 7th 03 11:47 PM

JAMES SHAFFER wiped his
nose with his yarmulke and hissed:


---On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:40:38 GMT, (DooDahMan) wrote:
---So this asshole cop pulls me over today and starts asking me why have
---scanner in my car.



****e mate you u live in a police state! you need to be liberated !

K2NNJ December 8th 03 12:25 AM

Get a copy of the New Jersey Police Manual. They are approx. $30.00 from
http://www.gannlaw.com/

If you can't the prosecutor (NJ does not use the term District Attorney) is
obligated to let you use his /hers in your defense. You should just be able
to quote the state statute.

The cop was probably trying to just give you a hard time figuring you don't
know the law. I doubt the officer will pursue this further.

73

Bob, K2NNJ



Midwest Kid December 8th 03 02:58 AM


"DooDahMan" wrote in message
...

What should I do? I know for a fact that it's not illegal and this

asshole
harrassed me just cuz he was bored i suppose.


First, speak with some lawyers and the prosecutor/district attorney. If you
find you are in the right, then I would see if it's legal for you to record
everything. File a complaint against the cop and if they call you, record
what they say. They could come and lock you up, and then you could end up
with a nice nest egg.



Brenda Ann December 8th 03 03:35 AM


"RHF" wrote in message
om...
DDM,

States have to demonstrate that they are 'enforcing' the "Seat
Belt" Laws or the Federal Government can cut certain Highway
and Transportation Funding that is 'tied' to "Safer Highways"


Thank You Jimmy Carter !
= Another Big Brother,
= = Big Government Idea !
= = = Form the Democrats [.]


And we can thank Mr. Reagan for blackmailing the states in a similar fashion
to raise the drinking age to 21.. I'm not certain that Carter had anything
much to do with the federal seatbelt mandate, but he had his own
boondoggles.. the 55mph speed limit, the banning of decorative gaslights,
etc. during the Arab oil embargo, and our own oil companies claiming we were
dangerously short on reserves so that they could gouge us at the pumps (at
least Carter's Attorney General made them give some of it back in the form
of free gas).

Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS. The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??



N8KDV December 8th 03 03:45 AM



Brenda Ann wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
om...
DDM,

States have to demonstrate that they are 'enforcing' the "Seat
Belt" Laws or the Federal Government can cut certain Highway
and Transportation Funding that is 'tied' to "Safer Highways"


Thank You Jimmy Carter !
= Another Big Brother,
= = Big Government Idea !
= = = Form the Democrats [.]


And we can thank Mr. Reagan for blackmailing the states in a similar fashion
to raise the drinking age to 21.. I'm not certain that Carter had anything
much to do with the federal seatbelt mandate, but he had his own
boondoggles.. the 55mph speed limit, the banning of decorative gaslights,
etc. during the Arab oil embargo, and our own oil companies claiming we were
dangerously short on reserves so that they could gouge us at the pumps (at
least Carter's Attorney General made them give some of it back in the form
of free gas).

Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS. The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??


Well I sure hope that it's Log Periodic antennas (a whole set of em!) for every
short-wave DXer out there.

And the big chunk of property to put 'em on too. And of course maintainence will
be done at the cost of the taxp...... er... Government too!



Brenda Ann December 8th 03 03:51 AM


"N8KDV" wrote in message
...
Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS. The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??


Well I sure hope that it's Log Periodic antennas (a whole set of em!) for

every
short-wave DXer out there.

And the big chunk of property to put 'em on too. And of course

maintainence will
be done at the cost of the taxp...... er... Government too!


Hey, that works for me. Every time I drive onto Kunsan AB and see the huge
log periodic antenna they have there, I get all envious..




Joe User December 8th 03 04:17 AM

On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 18:47:12 -0500, ex-patBrit
wrote:

****e mate you u live in a police state! you need to be liberated !


True, NJ /is/ a police state. Took a road trip a couple of years ago,
drove almost 6000 miles around the midwest and northwest USA, saw
maybe three speed traps the whole time. On the final leg through NJ
heading back into NYC, counted over TWENTY speed traps. And those are
just the ones that didn't bother hiding.

And remember, NJ is one of those places where DWB is a felony offense.
(Driving While Black, for the uninitiated).

I've boycotted New Jersey.

Pick up your scanner and move somewhere that the police don't act like
stormtroopers.


RP Jones December 8th 03 04:42 AM

And they will plant dope in your car if your not nice to them.
I refuse to drive in the state with New York plates.
Yeas ago I was stopped on the Palisades Pkwy in Alpine for a tire presser
test.
The cop said the tires have to much wear and said: "you cant drive garbage
through the streets here"
They impounded my 68 Chevy van and slashed the 2 front tires, handed me an
unsafe vehicle ticket and told me start walking ......waiving nightsticks
-RP

"Joe User" wrote:

True, NJ /is/ a police state. Took a road trip a couple of years ago,
drove almost 6000 miles around the midwest and northwest USA, saw
maybe three speed traps the whole time. On the final leg through NJ
heading back into NYC, counted over TWENTY speed traps. And those are
just the ones that didn't bother hiding.

And remember, NJ is one of those places where DWB is a felony offense.
(Driving While Black, for the uninitiated).

I've boycotted New Jersey.

Pick up your scanner and move somewhere that the police don't act like
stormtroopers.




DooDahMan December 8th 03 05:03 AM

"core_dump" wrote in message
. 3.44...
(DooDahMan) wrote in :
Wasn't this exact message posted once before? It seems awfully familiar.


Absolutely it was. By a RedXIII:

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:thl...0comcast.c om

This troll who has now assumed my identity , obviously has mistaken me for
some cop hating maggot. And everyone here is still stupid enough to fall for
it.




JJ December 8th 03 06:27 AM

DooDahMan wrote:


Go **** yourself doc.


I think I see why the cop may have been a little rude. Could you
attitude have had something to do with it maybe?


D. Stussy December 8th 03 07:47 AM

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Stinger wrote:
That's a shame.

Well, the first thing to do is wait thirty days so you won't have two
charges to defend (bogus or not, it will take up your time if he's provoked
into filing the charge).

After that, my suggestion would be to ask your local District Attorney for
an opinion on your radio (he'll appreciate the links, or better yet-- a hard
copy), and get his favorable reply in writing. (You may end up with an
Assistant DA, but they will accommodate you if you persist.)


What the DA thinks doesn't matter. See FCC ruling 93-17, which dealt with
amateur radio equipment which could RX public safety frequencies. Once the feds
rule, local jurisdictions don't have a choice.

Keep the letter with your insurance certificate and registration handy in
your glove compartment, just in case you forget to buckle-up again.


What I didn't see in the original post was whether or not the driver WAS wearing
a seat belt or not....

D. Stussy December 8th 03 07:52 AM

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Jim Shaffer, Jr. wrote:
[Scanner post text deleted]

Well, what do you expect from someone so ****ing stupid that he can live with
himself for enforcing seatbelt laws? Victimless crimes should be abolished.
The "people" enforcing such laws are robots, not human beings.


Since when is that a "victimless" crime? Jerk not wearing a seat-belt gets
involved in an accident (his fault or not; doesn't matter) - and sues the other
driver for the aggravation of his injuries (which could have been avoided or
certainly lessened if a seat belt had been worn). Insurance company raises
rates on ALL customers due to the litigation (even if their insured is not at
fault - because of the "general statistics" of more serious accidents in the
area).

Unless you can show me that ONLY the rates of the non-seat-belt-wearer are
affected, then there are victims other than the perp. of your "victimless"
crime....

Lord Floyd December 8th 03 09:25 AM

"DSL" wrote in news:i2XAb.9736
:

What county (Specifically what city) did this happen in ????


It didn't happen anywhere, this whole thread is based on a bogus story that
showed up in April.

It's troll bait. The OP even includes himself in the his moron list,
reread the original message.

The OP is just a cross-posting dumbass sheep shagger who has a hardon for
some of the radio groups.

Search google groups using this criteria: asshole cop group:*.scanner

--
You are a fluke of the Universe
You have no right to be here
And whether you can hear it or not,
the Universe is laughing behind your back

donutbandit December 8th 03 10:08 AM

(DooDahMan) wrote in :

What should I do? I know for a fact that it's not illegal and this
asshole harrassed me just cuz he was bored i suppose.


Maybe he noticed that you didn't have your seatbelt on, moron!

Is your IQ over 50? Your original post didn't verify that.


Troll Alert December 8th 03 11:36 AM

TROLL ALERT

This is the same troll that posted the FALSE message a couple years
ago about having his scanner in a department store. He heard security
watching someone else, warned that someone else, and got his butt
whipped by security for doing so.

I WISH IT REALLY HAPPENED!!!

TROLL ALERT



On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:25:55 GMT, Lord Floyd
wrote:

"DSL" wrote in news:i2XAb.9736
:

What county (Specifically what city) did this happen in ????


It didn't happen anywhere, this whole thread is based on a bogus story that
showed up in April.

It's troll bait. The OP even includes himself in the his moron list,
reread the original message.

The OP is just a cross-posting dumbass sheep shagger who has a hardon for
some of the radio groups.

Search google groups using this criteria: asshole cop group:*.scanner



Dr. Anton Squeegee December 8th 03 05:04 PM

In article , says...

big snip

Go **** yourself doc.


Oh, such an intelligent, well-thought-out response!

I think I've found another entry for my Usenet filter file.

*PLONK!*


--
Dr. Anton Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR)
kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t c&o&m
Motorola Radio Programming & Service Available -
http://www.bluefeathertech.com/rf.html
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (Red Green)

[email protected] December 8th 03 08:55 PM



Midwest Kid wrote:

"DooDahMan" wrote in message
...

What should I do? I know for a fact that it's not illegal and this

asshole
harrassed me just cuz he was bored i suppose.


First, speak with some lawyers and the prosecutor/district attorney. If you
find you are in the right, then I would see if it's legal for you to record
everything. File a complaint against the cop and if they call you, record
what they say. They could come and lock you up, and then you could end up
with a nice nest egg.


Let's get real and stop the BS. The police are not going to lock anyone
up for having a scanner in their vehicle of not having the belt on.
That's the most stupid thing I have read.

You most likely was stopped to for NOT being buckled up. Most states
require some other violation before they can use the belt laws. The
scanner was just an after thought when the officer seen it. The majority
of police (citizens) know nothing about radio/scanner laws. It's not a
hobby like fishing or motorcycling etc..

What you DDM should do is stop being a nut and start being polite, just
like you would expect be to done to you. The newsgroups are not the
place to ask legal questions in the first place. As was stated, get a
copy of the scanner laws and show the officer, that could help him/her
in their duties and help keep the heat off off of you and someone else
in the future.

[email protected] December 8th 03 09:04 PM

The "55" came from Nixon. You remember him and watergate.

"ONE" term Carter was a boondoggle.

Carter needed the FREE gas to cook his peanuts.

10-4 on the unfunded mandateed laws from the Feds. They make laws that
the states are required to enforce but fail to fund them.

Brenda Ann wrote:

And we can thank Mr. Reagan for blackmailing the states in a similar fashion
to raise the drinking age to 21.. I'm not certain that Carter had anything
much to do with the federal seatbelt mandate, but he had his own
boondoggles.. the 55mph speed limit, the banning of decorative gaslights,
etc. during the Arab oil embargo, and our own oil companies claiming we were
dangerously short on reserves so that they could gouge us at the pumps (at
least Carter's Attorney General made them give some of it back in the form
of free gas).

Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS. The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??


Jim Shaffer, Jr. December 8th 03 10:20 PM

On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:52:44 GMT, "D. Stussy" wrote:

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Jim Shaffer, Jr. wrote:
[Scanner post text deleted]

Well, what do you expect from someone so ****ing stupid that he can live with
himself for enforcing seatbelt laws? Victimless crimes should be abolished.
The "people" enforcing such laws are robots, not human beings.


Since when is that a "victimless" crime? Jerk not wearing a seat-belt gets
involved in an accident (his fault or not; doesn't matter) - and sues the other
driver for the aggravation of his injuries (which could have been avoided or
certainly lessened if a seat belt had been worn). Insurance company raises
rates on ALL customers due to the litigation (even if their insured is not at
fault - because of the "general statistics" of more serious accidents in the
area).


Mandatory insurance is also fascism, and the government should be paying for
everyone's health care anyway -- they're not doing anything else useful with the
taxes they take from us.



David Casey December 9th 03 07:29 AM

On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 17:20:46 -0500, Jim Shaffer, Jr. wrote:

Mandatory insurance is also fascism, and the government should be paying for
everyone's health care anyway -- they're not doing anything else useful with the
taxes they take from us.


Is it a full moon already or what?

Dave
--
You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us!
US Army Signal Corps!!

www.geocities.com/davidcasey98
Added Patriot live fire pics from June 2002,
Bosque fire pics from June 2003, CQB training
pics from October 2003, FTX pics from October 2000,
NBC training pics from September 2000, and
Dining Out pics from October 2000!

KØHB December 9th 03 05:42 PM


"D. Stussy" wrote

Since when is that a "victimless" crime? Jerk not wearing a seat-belt

gets
involved in an accident (his fault or not; doesn't matter) - and sues the

other
driver for the aggravation of his injuries (which could have been avoided

or
certainly lessened if a seat belt had been worn).


Another example of the Great Dumbing Down of America.

The world is methodically being dumbed down by government efforts to protect
us from stupid people.

Stupid drivers don't recognize the dangers of speed, so they drive too fast
and kill themselves. The government regulates speed, so now more stupid
people survive.

Stupid automobile passengers get killed because they don't buckle their
seat belts. Government steps in and makes seat belt usage mandatory,
so now more stupid people survive.

Stupid pedestrians don't know enough to not step out into a busy street, so
they get injured and killed trying to cross the street. The government makes
laws giving them the right-of-way, so now more stupid people survive.

Stupid parents don't recognize the value of childhood inoculations. The
government makes them vaccinate their children before entering school, so
now more stupid people survive.

Stupid hams don't know enough to keep their fingers out of 3KV plate
transformers, so they get fried in their own juice. Some would have the
government protect them, and more stupid people would survive.

In the ways of Mother Nature, stupidity was kept in check because stupid
people generally didn't survive to breeding age, thus our species tended to
get smarter over time.

But stupidity begets stupidity, so we are being overwhelmed by a tsunami of
stupidity. The tsunami is triggered by the government protection of stupid
people, which allows them to survive to reproduce.

Ergo, less government regulations makes a smarter populace.

73, de Hans, K0HB





Dave Bushong December 9th 03 11:52 PM

(minor pruning of groups)

KØHB wrote:

"D. Stussy" wrote


[seatbelts]

Another example of the Great Dumbing Down of America.

The world is methodically being dumbed down by government efforts to protect
us from stupid people.

Stupid drivers don't recognize the dangers of speed, so they drive too fast
and kill themselves. The government regulates speed, so now more stupid
people survive.
[...]


Most people aren't willing to be this honest. But it is true -- nature
prunes itself, everywhere from the old branches on that oak tree in your
backyard, to the newly-hatched turtle who can't make it to the shoreline
before the seagull eats him up.

It's sad but true. And as usual, humans are trying to change the way
nature works.

My guess is that the dinosaurs tried that once.

ONCE.

Dave
KZ1O

--
This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender,
you MUST include this in the subject line:

YKXWBSX7I6 01/03/2004

(without that string in the subject, your
message will be deleted, unread)


Allen McBroom December 10th 03 09:02 PM

"DSL" scribed upon the newsgroup
scroll :

Uh pardon me, but he won't be able to tell you that because you and

everyone
else that replied are being trolled. The post that you are replying
to was originally posted in April of this year not by me, but by
someone going by the alias "RedXIII".

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:thl...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=XiGdnQpVrN5FVTijXTWcpw%40comcast.c om


Further info on this, he posted the same as "RedXIII" in
rec.radio.scanner on April 22, 2003 (probably a cross post).
Link is:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ght&rnum=&thl=
0,1083608724,1083589878

A click on the link in his sig

(http://mywebpages.comcast.net/RedXIII1/Info.html)

provided enlightenng, yet crude, info that RedXIII is just a troll. This
link verifies this.

The actual page text says: "You're all a bunch of f***ing losers that
are being duped by the REC.RADIO TROLL!!!! F**K OFF!!!"


How much more more do we need to realize every bit of the original
post is troll fodder?
Gosh.


-
Allen McBroom
Remove WOOF when replying by email

D. Stussy December 12th 03 06:32 AM

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 wrote:
Midwest Kid wrote:
"DooDahMan" wrote in message
...

What should I do? I know for a fact that it's not illegal and this

asshole
harrassed me just cuz he was bored i suppose.


First, speak with some lawyers and the prosecutor/district attorney. If you
find you are in the right, then I would see if it's legal for you to record
everything. File a complaint against the cop and if they call you, record
what they say. They could come and lock you up, and then you could end up
with a nice nest egg.


Let's get real and stop the BS. The police are not going to lock anyone
up for having a scanner in their vehicle of not having the belt on.
That's the most stupid thing I have read.

You most likely was stopped to for NOT being buckled up. Most states
require some other violation before they can use the belt laws. The
scanner was just an after thought when the officer seen it. The majority
of police (citizens) know nothing about radio/scanner laws. It's not a
hobby like fishing or motorcycling etc..


Then they shouldn't be trying to enforce such laws or assume that something is
illegal just because they don't like it. They have no authority to enforce a
law that doesn't exist.

What you DDM should do is stop being a nut and start being polite, just
like you would expect be to done to you. The newsgroups are not the
place to ask legal questions in the first place. As was stated, get a
copy of the scanner laws and show the officer, that could help him/her
in their duties and help keep the heat off off of you and someone else
in the future.


Mike Coslo December 14th 03 06:58 PM

wrote:

The "55" came from Nixon. You remember him and watergate.


You ruined a good rant, Pappy!

- Mike -


Jerry None December 16th 03 07:08 PM

We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before thanks to those Rush
Limbaugh Republicans. We need a change for the better: Vote
Democratic in 2004.

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ...
"RHF" wrote in message
om...
DDM,

States have to demonstrate that they are 'enforcing' the "Seat
Belt" Laws or the Federal Government can cut certain Highway
and Transportation Funding that is 'tied' to "Safer Highways"


Thank You Jimmy Carter !
= Another Big Brother,
= = Big Government Idea !
= = = Form the Democrats [.]


And we can thank Mr. Reagan for blackmailing the states in a similar fashion
to raise the drinking age to 21.. I'm not certain that Carter had anything
much to do with the federal seatbelt mandate, but he had his own
boondoggles.. the 55mph speed limit, the banning of decorative gaslights,
etc. during the Arab oil embargo, and our own oil companies claiming we were
dangerously short on reserves so that they could gouge us at the pumps (at
least Carter's Attorney General made them give some of it back in the form
of free gas).

Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS. The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??


:-: Ghost Chip :-: December 16th 03 09:33 PM



"Jerry None" wrote in message
om...
We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before thanks to those

Rush
Limbaugh Republicans. We need a change for the better: Vote
Democratic in 2004.

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message

...
"RHF" wrote in message
om...
DDM,

States have to demonstrate that they are 'enforcing' the "Seat
Belt" Laws or the Federal Government can cut certain Highway
and Transportation Funding that is 'tied' to "Safer Highways"


Thank You Jimmy Carter !
= Another Big Brother,
= = Big Government Idea !
= = = Form the Democrats [.]


And we can thank Mr. Reagan for blackmailing the states in a

similar fashion
to raise the drinking age to 21.. I'm not certain that Carter

had anything
much to do with the federal seatbelt mandate, but he had his own
boondoggles.. the 55mph speed limit, the banning of decorative

gaslights,
etc. during the Arab oil embargo, and our own oil companies

claiming we were
dangerously short on reserves so that they could gouge us at the

pumps (at
least Carter's Attorney General made them give some of it back

in the form
of free gas).

Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS.

The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their

bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??


Read the 10th Amendment for the few limited powers the FEDs were
explicitly given.
All other power was left to the states.
All the rest of FED power is economic blackmail upon the States.
Ghost



RHF December 16th 03 11:30 PM

JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic.

Regardless of which Political Party Democrat, Republican, Green, Peace
and Freedom, American Independent, Libertarian, ETC.

Do Not Confuse Democratic Principles and the Concept of Democracy:
= = = With the Political Party that Labels itself "Democrat"

BE AN AMERICA FIRST AND FORMOST [.]
- Political Party Label and
- - Political Party Membership is way down the List.
- - - After Family, Faith and the Brotherhood of Man . . .


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[ Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch
]
..
..
= = = (Jerry None)
= = = wrote in message . com...
We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before thanks to those Rush
Limbaugh Republicans. We need a change for the better: Vote
Democratic in 2004.

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ...
"RHF" wrote in message
om...
DDM,

States have to demonstrate that they are 'enforcing' the "Seat
Belt" Laws or the Federal Government can cut certain Highway
and Transportation Funding that is 'tied' to "Safer Highways"


Thank You Jimmy Carter !
= Another Big Brother,
= = Big Government Idea !
= = = Form the Democrats [.]


And we can thank Mr. Reagan for blackmailing the states in a similar fashion
to raise the drinking age to 21.. I'm not certain that Carter had anything
much to do with the federal seatbelt mandate, but he had his own
boondoggles.. the 55mph speed limit, the banning of decorative gaslights,
etc. during the Arab oil embargo, and our own oil companies claiming we were
dangerously short on reserves so that they could gouge us at the pumps (at
least Carter's Attorney General made them give some of it back in the form
of free gas).

Doesn't matter anyway which party pushes this stuff.... it's BS. The
federal government has been strongarming states to do their bidding for
years.. wonder what the next unfunded mandate will be??


Dave Bushong December 17th 03 01:32 AM

Jerry None wrote:

We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before thanks to those Rush
Limbaugh Republicans. We need a change for the better: Vote
Democratic in 2004.


Yeah.

??? Voting for a democrat will help ???

Oh, wait -- YOU'RE STUPID! I didn't realize that! My mistake.

You need to put a .siggie at the end of your post that says that you are
stupid.

By the way, we (taxpayers) would like to spend $200 Million to make sure
that your seat in the short bus is comfortable. Is that OK? It will be
funded from the taxes from the "rich". OK?

I'm going to be flamed. But at least I identify myself. They won't

Check it out yourself. If they use a real address, mark it on your
calendar. If they use a fake, or anon, address, they are typical libs.
Worthless.

See the trailer if you want to reply!

All the best,

Dave

--
This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender,
you MUST include this in the subject line (it may already be there):

YKXWBSX7I6 01/03/2004

(without that string in the subject, your
message will be deleted, unread)


Dave Bushong December 17th 03 01:34 AM

RHF wrote:

JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic.


So, democrats elected Bush?

Let's see -- Bush is President.

RHF says that "Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic".

Done.


RHF December 17th 03 01:00 PM

DB,

Your {Il}Logic Fails You [.]

NOTE: Some Democrats undoubtedly did Vote for Candidate GW Bush in
2000.
- But then again some Republicans
- - Must have Voted for
- - - Candidate Al Gore in 2004.

FWIW: Members of Both Major Parties: Democrat and Republican.
= = = Evidently did Vote for Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan.
(Either By Choice -or- By Accident)

Its Called "Democracy" and Inspite of Your Party Affiliation:
= You Have The RIGHT To VOTE For The Candidate of Your CHOICE.
= = Another Basic American FREEDOM !
= = = An American Citizen Has . . .
= = = = The Right, Duty and Responsibility to VOTE [.]

AMERICANISM {The Spirit of America} FIRST:
= = = Overcoming Political Affiliation and Party.
Doing What Is Right For Your Country Out Of Love And Respect For It.

Maybe JFK said it very well in these few Words.
"And so, My Fellow Americans:
- Ask NOT What Your Country Can Do For You
- - Ask What You Can Do For Your Country."
- - - Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy
- - - - Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961
NOTE: Not Political Party - But YOUR COUNTRY [.]

FWIW: Many remember these Lines . . .
- - - But do Many Remember the Next Lines ? ? ?

"My fellow citizens of the world:
- Ask Not What America Will Do For You,
- - But What Together We Can Do For The FREEDOM Of Man.
- - - John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America

"Finally, whether you are Citizens of America or citizens of the
world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and
sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure
reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, Let Us Go Forth To
Lead The Land We Love, asking His Blessing and His Help, but knowing
that here on earth God's Work Must Truly Be Our Own."
- - - John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America

Where are the Democrat Party Leaders like JFK Today ? ? ?
- And WHY arn't any running for President in 2004 ? ? ?
- - WHY Must We Be Left ONLY with the Choice of GW Bush
- - - and one of the DeMoCratZys in 2004 why, Why. WHY !


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
..
..
= = = Dave Bushong
= = = wrote in message . net...

RHF wrote:

JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic(ally).


So, democrats elected Bush?

Let's see -- Bush is President.

RHF says that "Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic".

Done.

..
..
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic (ally).

Regardless of which Political Party Democrat, Republican, Green, Peace
and Freedom, American Independent, Libertarian, ETC.

Do Not Confuse Democratic Principles and the Concept of Democracy:
= = = With the Political Party that Labels itself "Democrat"

BE AN AMERICA FIRST AND FORMOST [.]
- Political Party Label and
- - Political Party Membership is way down the List.
- - - After Family, Faith and the Brotherhood of Man . . .


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
..
..
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Jerry None )
Subject: Asshole Cop
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: 2003-12-16 11:08:01 PST

We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before
thanks to those Rush Limbaugh Republicans.

We need a change for the better: Vote Democratic in 2004.

..

..

Dave Bushong December 19th 03 09:57 PM

RHF,

I'm not going to followup any more after this one, except to say that
the dashes and equal signs in your posting confuse me. You must be new
to the keyboard.

However, I'm really digging my new IC-R10. Not terribly hot, nor
selective, receiving on HF, but it's nice to be able to take a hand-held
to work that lets me know if HF or 6m is "hoppin", plus for use as a
regular scanner on VHF/UHF.

That being said, since this is a radio group, I also want to say that
you should post *before* you start drinking. You sound like a very old
person with the mind of a child.

But getting back to the JFK quote, you seem to forget that the purpose
of government is to serve the people. The idea of "ask not what your
country can do for you..." is completely contrary to the concepts
espoused by the framers of the U.S. Constitution. You can compare that
document, he http://memory.loc.gov/const/const.html and then compare
it to China's version:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...ent_633686.htm


"It also follows that if a government ... itself begins to violate those
rights - then it is the right and duty of the people to regain control
of their affairs and set up a form of government that will serve the
people better." --Thomas Jefferson

Here are some good links to learn more about this country:

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/7970/jefpco21.htm
http://www.kidport.com/RefLib/UsaHis...ion/DecInd.htm
http://quote.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson
http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/rp1/wwwhw022.html

Now, it's important that I say this: whatever you feel about politics or
religion, in this country you may say it freely. Yes, that's right,
even if I don't agree with you. I've been called a jerk by people whose
opinions I deeply respect.

All the best, and 73,
Dave
KZ1O

RHF wrote:

DB,

Your {Il}Logic Fails You [.]

NOTE: Some Democrats undoubtedly did Vote for Candidate GW Bush in
2000.
- But then again some Republicans
- - Must have Voted for
- - - Candidate Al Gore in 2004.

FWIW: Members of Both Major Parties: Democrat and Republican.
= = = Evidently did Vote for Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan.
(Either By Choice -or- By Accident)

Its Called "Democracy" and Inspite of Your Party Affiliation:
= You Have The RIGHT To VOTE For The Candidate of Your CHOICE.
= = Another Basic American FREEDOM !
= = = An American Citizen Has . . .
= = = = The Right, Duty and Responsibility to VOTE [.]

AMERICANISM {The Spirit of America} FIRST:
= = = Overcoming Political Affiliation and Party.
Doing What Is Right For Your Country Out Of Love And Respect For It.

Maybe JFK said it very well in these few Words.
"And so, My Fellow Americans:
- Ask NOT What Your Country Can Do For You
- - Ask What You Can Do For Your Country."
- - - Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy
- - - - Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961
NOTE: Not Political Party - But YOUR COUNTRY [.]

FWIW: Many remember these Lines . . .
- - - But do Many Remember the Next Lines ? ? ?

"My fellow citizens of the world:
- Ask Not What America Will Do For You,
- - But What Together We Can Do For The FREEDOM Of Man.
- - - John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America

"Finally, whether you are Citizens of America or citizens of the
world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and
sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure
reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, Let Us Go Forth To
Lead The Land We Love, asking His Blessing and His Help, but knowing
that here on earth God's Work Must Truly Be Our Own."
- - - John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America

Where are the Democrat Party Leaders like JFK Today ? ? ?
- And WHY arn't any running for President in 2004 ? ? ?
- - WHY Must We Be Left ONLY with the Choice of GW Bush
- - - and one of the DeMoCratZys in 2004 why, Why. WHY !


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
.
.
= = = Dave Bushong
= = = wrote in message . net...

RHF wrote:


JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic(ally).


So, democrats elected Bush?

Let's see -- Bush is President.

RHF says that "Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic".

Done.


.
.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic (ally).

Regardless of which Political Party Democrat, Republican, Green, Peace
and Freedom, American Independent, Libertarian, ETC.

Do Not Confuse Democratic Principles and the Concept of Democracy:
= = = With the Political Party that Labels itself "Democrat"

BE AN AMERICA FIRST AND FORMOST [.]
- Political Party Label and
- - Political Party Membership is way down the List.
- - - After Family, Faith and the Brotherhood of Man . . .


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
.
.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Jerry None )
Subject: Asshole Cop
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: 2003-12-16 11:08:01 PST

We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before
thanks to those Rush Limbaugh Republicans.

We need a change for the better: Vote Democratic in 2004.

.

.



--
This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender,
you MUST include this in the subject line:

YKXWBSX7I6 01/03/2004

(without that string in the subject, your
message will be deleted, unread)


RHF December 20th 03 03:32 AM

DB,

= = = Dave Bushong
= = = wrote in message t...

RHF,

I'm not going to followup any more after this one, except to say that
the dashes and equal signs in your posting confuse me.


=R= Its just something that my old mind can still understand in
formating my ideas on the new fangled computer media.
..
..
You must be new to the keyboard.


=R= You are Oh So Right - tYPING wAS nOT sOMTHING a mAN lEARNED wAY
bACK wHEN i wENT tO lOOHCS.
..
..
However, I'm really digging my new IC-R10. Not terribly hot, nor
selective, receiving on HF, but it's nice to be able to take a hand-held
to work that lets me know if HF or 6m is "hoppin", plus for use as a
regular scanner on VHF/UHF.


=R= we All should Enjoy the Simple Things In Life.
= = = Enjoy Your Radio.
..
..
That being said, since this is a radio group, I also want to say that
you should post *before* you start drinking.


=R= That is True - I Drink To Much !
..
..
You sound like a very old person with the mind of a child.


=R= YES - I am a very old man. And Child Like - I Love My Country [.]
? ? ? Am I WRONG To Love My Country ? ? ?
- I Loved My Country As A Child.
- - I Loved My Country As An Adult, Husband, and Father.
- - - I Taught My Children to Love Their Country.
- - - - And Today As An Old Man "I LOVE MY COUNTRY" [.]
..
..
But getting back to the JFK quote, you seem to forget that the purpose
of government is to serve the people.


=R= In The USofA - The Government is "The People".
- JFK was Calling On "The People" to Serve In Their Government
- - To Make Their Government
- - - The Best It Could Be
- - - - On Behalf of "The People".
( Been Their Done That ! )
..
..
The idea of "ask not what your country can do for you..." is
completely contrary to the concepts espoused by the framers of
the U.S. Constitution. You can compare that document, he
GoTo= http://memory.loc.gov/const/const.html
and then compare it to China's version:
GoTo= http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...ent_633686.htm


=R= AHhhh, The Constitution of the USofA -=V=-
The Constitution of the Constitution of Communist Party of China.
? ? ? How Can These Two Documents Be Compared ? ? ?

The Constitution of a Nation -=V=- The Constitution of a Political
Party.

This is Where 'todays' DeMoCratZys error in their Priorities.
= = = They Put Party - Before Nation.
..
..
"It also follows that if a government ...
itself begins to violate those rights -
then it is the right and duty of the people to regain control
of their affairs and set up a form of government that will
serve the people better." - - - Thomas Jefferson


=R= My Choice has always been to Work Within The System to Affect
Change.
= = = A Process of Evolution

Not To Attack the System to Effect Change.
= = = A Process of Revolution.
..
..
Here are some good links to learn more about this country:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/7970/jefpco21.htm
http://www.kidport.com/RefLib/UsaHis...ion/DecInd.htm
http://quote.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson
http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/rp1/wwwhw022.html


=R= I will add them to 'my' Reading List - Thank You :o)
..
..
Now, it's important that I say this: whatever you feel about
politics or religion, in this country you may say it freely.
Yes, that's right, even if I don't agree with you. I've been
called a jerk by people whose opinions I deeply respect.


=R= If this is True ? ? ? Then why, Why. WHY !
- - - Did you "Choose" words like:

"I also want to say that you should post *before* you start drinking."

"You sound like a very old person with the mind of a child."


All the best, and 73,
Dave
KZ1O



Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
..
..
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

RHF wrote:


DB,

Your {Il}Logic Fails You [.]

NOTE: Some Democrats undoubtedly did Vote for Candidate GW Bush in
2000.
- But then again some Republicans
- - Must have Voted for
- - - Candidate Al Gore in 2004.

FWIW: Members of Both Major Parties: Democrat and Republican.
= = = Evidently did Vote for Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan.
(Either By Choice -or- By Accident)

Its Called "Democracy" and Inspite of Your Party Affiliation:
= You Have The RIGHT To VOTE For The Candidate of Your CHOICE.
= = Another Basic American FREEDOM !
= = = An American Citizen Has . . .
= = = = The Right, Duty and Responsibility to VOTE [.]

AMERICANISM {The Spirit of America} FIRST:
= = = Overcoming Political Affiliation and Party.
Doing What Is Right For Your Country Out Of Love And Respect For It.

Maybe JFK said it very well in these few Words.
"And so, My Fellow Americans:
- Ask NOT What Your Country Can Do For You
- - Ask What You Can Do For Your Country."
- - - Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy
- - - - Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961
NOTE: Not Political Party - But YOUR COUNTRY [.]

FWIW: Many remember these Lines . . .
- - - But do Many Remember the Next Lines ? ? ?

"My fellow citizens of the world:
- Ask Not What America Will Do For You,
- - But What Together We Can Do For The FREEDOM Of Man.
- - - John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America

"Finally, whether you are Citizens of America or citizens of the
world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and
sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure
reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, Let Us Go Forth To
Lead The Land We Love, asking His Blessing and His Help, but knowing
that here on earth God's Work Must Truly Be Our Own."
- - - John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America

Where are the Democrat Party Leaders like JFK Today ? ? ?
- And WHY arn't any running for President in 2004 ? ? ?
- - WHY Must We Be Left ONLY with the Choice of GW Bush
- - - and one of the DeMoCratZys in 2004 why, Why. WHY !


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
.
.
= = = Dave Bushong
= = = wrote in message . net...

RHF wrote:


JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic(ally).

So, democrats elected Bush?

Let's see -- Bush is President.

RHF says that "Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic".

Done.


.
.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

JN,

Everyone Who VOTES - Votes Democratic (ally).

Regardless of which Political Party Democrat, Republican, Green, Peace
and Freedom, American Independent, Libertarian, ETC.

Do Not Confuse Democratic Principles and the Concept of Democracy:
= = = With the Political Party that Labels itself "Democrat"

BE AN AMERICA FIRST AND FORMOST [.]
- Political Party Label and
- - Political Party Membership is way down the List.
- - - After Family, Faith and the Brotherhood of Man . . .


Blessed by God with Life and Progressive by Nature thru Living ~ RHF
[Just an Old Retired Blue Collar Union Member - Dosvedanya Tovarisch]
.
.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Jerry None )
Subject: Asshole Cop
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: 2003-12-16 11:08:01 PST

We have MORE Big Brother stuff now then before
thanks to those Rush Limbaugh Republicans.

We need a change for the better: Vote Democratic in 2004.

.

.


Ken Thomas December 20th 03 05:49 AM

On 19 Dec 2003 19:32:29 -0800, (RHF) wrote:

DB,

= = = Dave Bushong
= = = wrote in message t...

RHF,

I'm not going to followup any more after this one, except to say that
the dashes and equal signs in your posting confuse me.



It's true. RHF is the most annoying poster with the dots and dashes
and who knows what else. It's not fun to read. And I usually enjoy
his info. It's up there with all caps. You can tell by RHF's
response that it hurt.... wrung true. That's evidence enough for me
that it's on purpose. Something about getting attention. Too bad.

matt wilson December 20th 03 06:32 AM

Obviously "asshole" & "cop" is a redundant term, like "political moron".

"RP Jones" wrote in message
...
And they will plant dope in your car if your not nice to them.
I refuse to drive in the state with New York plates.
Yeas ago I was stopped on the Palisades Pkwy in Alpine for a tire presser
test.
The cop said the tires have to much wear and said: "you cant drive

garbage
through the streets here"
They impounded my 68 Chevy van and slashed the 2 front tires, handed me an
unsafe vehicle ticket and told me start walking ......waiving nightsticks
-RP

"Joe User" wrote:

True, NJ /is/ a police state. Took a road trip a couple of years ago,
drove almost 6000 miles around the midwest and northwest USA, saw
maybe three speed traps the whole time. On the final leg through NJ
heading back into NYC, counted over TWENTY speed traps. And those are
just the ones that didn't bother hiding.

And remember, NJ is one of those places where DWB is a felony offense.
(Driving While Black, for the uninitiated).

I've boycotted New Jersey.

Pick up your scanner and move somewhere that the police don't act like
stormtroopers.






Telamon December 20th 03 11:19 PM

In article ,
Dave Bushong wrote:

snip

But getting back to the JFK quote, you seem to forget that the
purpose of government is to serve the people. The idea of "ask not
what your country can do for you..." is completely contrary to the
concepts espoused by the framers of the U.S. Constitution. You can
compare that document, he http://memory.loc.gov/const/const.html
and then compare it to China's version:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...ent_633686.htm


snip

JFK was making a request that people volunteer their time to make this
nation and through the Peace Corps the world a better place. It was not
a demand and not against the Constitution. Trying to compare this
request to any demand Red China has made of their people under penalty
of their law is insulting to our nation and memory of a great leader.
You show no understanding of past events with comments like this. You
should be ashamed of writing something like this. Please re-think what
you wrote.

I can count the number of times on one hand that a world leader made a
speech inspiring people to make the world a better place out of self
sacrifice and you try to compare this to a repressive communist regimes
actions? Totally incongruous is this thinking.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

RHF December 21st 03 02:54 AM

TELAMON,

JFK's "Call" was NOT Limited to the Peace Corps; but to
Service of All Kinds to This Nation to Make It Greater.

+ To Get Involved in Government Civil Service.

+ To Join the Military

+ To Become a Teacher, Nurse, Doctor, ETC

+ To Become a Fireman, Policeman, Public Service Worker

+ To Volunteer in Your Communities - Helping Others

+ To Volunteer for the Peace Corps, VISTA, AmeriCorps

+ YES - Even To Get Involved into Politics

For Every American to Actively Work to Build A Better America [.]


NOTE: IMHO - A Better America - Will Make for A Better World.
- I Do Not Subscribe to the "False" Idea of the OWLES
- - That Only By Tearing Down America in Words and Deads
- - - That We Can Then Start to Begin To Build A Better World.

REMEMBER TOO: On that Inauguation Day JFK Also Spoke These Words.
"Let Us Go Forth To Lead The Land We Love,
asking His Blessing and His Help,
but knowing that here on earth
God's Work Must Truly Be Our Own."
- - - Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy
- - - Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961


gba ~ RHF
= = = God Bless America and Our Elected Leaders - Amen !
..
..
= = = Telamon
= = = wrote in message ...
In article ,
Dave Bushong wrote:

snip

But getting back to the JFK quote, you seem to forget that the
purpose of government is to serve the people. The idea of "ask not
what your country can do for you..." is completely contrary to the
concepts espoused by the framers of the U.S. Constitution. You can
compare that document, he http://memory.loc.gov/const/const.html
and then compare it to China's version:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...ent_633686.htm


snip

JFK was making a request that people volunteer their time to make this
nation and through the Peace Corps the world a better place. It was not
a demand and not against the Constitution. Trying to compare this
request to any demand Red China has made of their people under penalty
of their law is insulting to our nation and memory of a great leader.
You show no understanding of past events with comments like this. You
should be ashamed of writing something like this. Please re-think what
you wrote.

I can count the number of times on one hand that a world leader made a
speech inspiring people to make the world a better place out of self
sacrifice and you try to compare this to a repressive communist regimes
actions? Totally incongruous is this thinking.


..

Roger Gt December 21st 03 08:02 PM


"RHF" wrote in message
m...
TELAMON,
JFK's "Call" was NOT Limited to the Peace Corps; but to
Service of All Kinds to This Nation to Make It Greater.

+ To Get Involved in Government Civil Service.
+ To Join the Military
+ To Become a Teacher, Nurse, Doctor, ETC
+ To Become a Fireman, Policeman, Public Service Worker
+ To Volunteer in Your Communities - Helping Others
+ To Volunteer for the Peace Corps, VISTA, AmeriCorps
+ YES - Even To Get Involved into Politics

For Every American to Actively Work to Build A Better America [.]


I notice these are all government paid (read Welfare) positions! Was there
ever a shortage of people with their hand out?

,snip

REMEMBER TOO: On that Inauguration Day JFK Also Spoke These Words.
"Let Us Go Forth To Lead The Land We Love,
asking His Blessing and His Help,
but knowing that here on earth
God's Work Must Truly Be Our Own."
- - - Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy
- - - Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961


Do you suppose JFK was shot for mouthing off?

If he had not said those things, would he still be alive?

Would he have been elected for a second term?




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com