Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Mike" == Mike Andrews writes: [... Robert Casey talks about fiber and railroad right-of-ways ...] Mike An increasing amount of fiber is being buried on (or under) Mike highway right-of-way. I know; I work for a state department of Mike transportation, and we worked deals to get some very nice free Mike bandwidth out of the fibers along some Interstates. I expect Mike we'll be able to do the same for fibers buried along federal and Mike state highways, once the carriers recover from the dot-bomb and Mike start building bandwidth out again. This was done five or ten years ago in New York -- I worked at the place that managed the fiber for the state. The fiber was laid along the NYS Thruway, which passes through the nine largest cities in NY and within some short number of miles of a large percentage of the state population. Much of that fiber was dark last I heard. The idea of buried fiber along every two-lane road in the country may be a fantasy, but laying cable along every Interstate is certainly doable with the resources available. Of course, who will run this true "information superhighway" is the next debate... Mike -- Mike Andrews Tired old sysadmin Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAjsOPGPFSfAB/ezgRAoLNAKDQ1ba8/I5uGGZCpqs0U5D2R7HKrwCeMmyq SpbRzv99q4xLcYnhNN6mF2U= =JVbz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jack Twilley" wrote The idea of buried fiber along every two-lane road in the country may be a fantasy, but laying cable along every Interstate is certainly doable with the resources available. Of course, who will run this true "information superhighway" is the next debate... Ten-twelve years ago I was up in northern Minnesota deer hunting. Got up to my stand way back down a township road, 5 miles from the nearest dwelling, at zero-dark-thirty and waited for Bambi's dad to show up with the sunrise. Just in time for morning colors (0800) I start hearing this awful racket off in the distance, like a farmer might be buring drainage tiles or something, except this part of Minnesota hasn't seen an agricultural plow since the depression. Finally got curious (and cold) enough to go investigate. Here, out in the middle of absolute nowhere, is a contract crew burying a 144-fiber cable big as your wrist, and another spare alonside of it. Every half-mile they put in an above-ground service loop, and the next day another crew came behind and plonked down a splice-and-access pedestal at each loop waiting for the subscribers to show up. The pedestals are still there, some kinda shot up, but no customers on the horizon. I bet the local Podunk Power Cooperative is getting ready to roll out BPL in the same manner! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Jack Twilley" wrote The idea of buried fiber along every two-lane road in the country may be a fantasy, but laying cable along every Interstate is certainly doable with the resources available. Of course, who will run this true "information superhighway" is the next debate... Ten-twelve years ago I was up in northern Minnesota deer hunting. Got up to my stand way back down a township road, 5 miles from the nearest dwelling, at zero-dark-thirty and waited for Bambi's dad to show up with the sunrise. Just in time for morning colors (0800) I start hearing this awful racket off in the distance, like a farmer might be buring drainage tiles or something, except this part of Minnesota hasn't seen an agricultural plow since the depression. Finally got curious (and cold) enough to go investigate. Here, out in the middle of absolute nowhere, is a contract crew burying a 144-fiber cable big as your wrist, and another spare alonside of it. Every half-mile they put in an above-ground service loop, and the next day another crew came behind and plonked down a splice-and-access pedestal at each loop waiting for the subscribers to show up. The pedestals are still there, some kinda shot up, but no customers on the horizon. I bet the local Podunk Power Cooperative is getting ready to roll out BPL in the same manner! 73, de Hans, K0HB Hello, Hans My gut feeling is that if someone is out in the boonies and they *really* want high speed internet, they could go for satellite and have a decent system. Yes, $50.00 per month is not as cheap as you can get cable or DSL (at least in some areas), but it is doable and I doubt too many ISPs are going to try high speed service where, even if they could subscribe everyone, the average population density is 10 per square mile or less I suspect that BPL will go the same route; they'll try, perhaps, but it will be in the cities and suburbs where they can make money (and they will have competition *and* cause a lot of qrm). The low population density areas will *still* not be served (except by satellite or, perhaps, dial-up). As for president, I *still* like Ike!!! 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.669 / Virus Database: 431 - Release Date: 4/26/04 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote While GWB calls for relaxing Part 15..... There needs to be technical standards to make possible new broadband technologies, such as the use of high-speed communication directly over power lines. Power lines were for electricity; power lines can be used for broadband technology. So the technical standards need to be changed to encourage that. .....the NTIAyesterday (4/27/2004) released a paper which argues AGAINST relaxing Part 15 (see below). Full NTIA report at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...bpl/index.html "Critical review of the assumptions underlying these analyses revealed that application of existing Part 15 compliance measurement procedures for BPL systems results in a significant underestimation of peak field strength. Underestimation of the actual peak field strength is the leading contributor to high interference risks. As applied in current practice to BPL systems, Part 15 measurement guidelines do not address unique physical and electromagnetic characteristics of BPL radiated emissions. Refining compliance measurement procedures for BPL systems will not impede implementation of BPL technology because BPL networks reportedly can be successfully implemented under existing field strength limits. "Accordingly, NTIA does NOT recommend that the FCC relax Part 15 field strength limits for BPL systems. Further based on studies to date, NTIA recommends several "access" BPL compliance measurement provisions that derive from existing Part 15 measurement guidelines. Among these are requirements to: use measurement antenna heights near the height of power lines; measure at a uniform distance of ten (10) meters from the BPL device and power lines; and measure using a calibrated rod antenna or a loop antenna in connection with appropriate factors relating magnetic and electric field strength levels at frequencies below 30 MHz." Sunuvagun, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote ....the NTIAyesterday (4/27/2004) released a paper which argues AGAINST relaxing Part 15 (see below). Full NTIA report at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...bpl/index.html Another excerpt..... "Assuming that co-frequency BPL devices are deployed at a density of one per km^2 within a circular area of 10 km radius, interference to aircraft reception of moderate-to-strong radio signals is likely to occur below 6 km altitude within 12 km of the center of the BPL deployment. Interference likely would occur to aircraft reception of weak-to-moderate radio signals within 40 km of the center of the BPL deployment area." Gee, do ya think we oughta deploy this in Terlingua, Texas, Mr. President? With all kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
GWB said:
And if you're living out in -- I should -- I was going to say Crawford, Texas, but it's not -- maybe not nearly as remote. (Laughter.) How about Terlingua, Texas? Hey, I've been through Terlingua. It's a ghost town outside the west gate of Big Bend National Park near the XE border. They're welcome to BPL! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|