Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote ....the NTIAyesterday (4/27/2004) released a paper which argues AGAINST relaxing Part 15 (see below). Full NTIA report at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...bpl/index.html Another excerpt..... "Assuming that co-frequency BPL devices are deployed at a density of one per km^2 within a circular area of 10 km radius, interference to aircraft reception of moderate-to-strong radio signals is likely to occur below 6 km altitude within 12 km of the center of the BPL deployment. Interference likely would occur to aircraft reception of weak-to-moderate radio signals within 40 km of the center of the BPL deployment area." Gee, do ya think we oughta deploy this in Terlingua, Texas, Mr. President? With all kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|