Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RC,
Instead of playing the 'game' of posting a reply to anything I post. Why don't you be helpful to the original poster and attempt to answer his question. First - What type (name) antenna is he talking about ? Second - What is your 'expert' opinion about this antenna ? Third - What are the technical aspects of this antenna ? - - - - - The Original Question - - - - - Hi, Does anyone remember a weird compact antenna that was featured in a 60's (or early 70's) edition of "73" magazine. Had 2 etched PCBs (like spaced plates) mounted inside a plastic bucket, and fed with coax? Does anyone know more details of this? JEFF ZL3TNV - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It's much nicer and rewarding to be honestly helpful .. . . then simply hateful. A 'noted' Yahoo ~ RHF .. .. = = = Richard Clark wrote in message = = = . .. On 5 Jul 2004 01:26:17 -0700, (RHF) wrote: The EH antenna has exceptional promise. It is about 10' in diameter, requires no extensive underground radials, uses approximately 75% less energy and is more efficient. Hi OM, More efficient that what, a resistor? 75% less energy than what, a resistor? The eh antenna is one of several of a class that take more effort for less return than simply putting up as much wire as you have room for - even if it is the same size as any of these "amazing!" antennas. The absurd claims that attend the cfa/eh/fractal crowing societies is matched by their inability to prove them except through their own special math (never mind the S-Meter). However, there are those who argue SWLers need poor antennas and I suppose these fit the bill nicely. The technical equivalent of cell phones VS string-and-dixie cups tho'. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC .. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Instead of playing the 'game' of posting a reply to anything I post.
Your ego is showing. Uh oh -- worlds are colliding. Remember, rec.radio.shortwave is not a radio newsgroup, the people there are not knowledgeable about, or interested in, the technical aspects of radio. If it doesn't involve nasty name-calling or wild-eyed, mouth-foaming political looniness, then it doesn't belong in rec.radio.shortwave. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
RHF wrote:
RC, Instead of playing the 'game' of posting a reply to anything I post. Why don't you be helpful to the original poster and attempt to answer his question. First - What type (name) antenna is he talking about ? A Dummy Load Second - What is your 'expert' opinion about this antenna ? Makes a pretty good Dummy load Third - What are the technical aspects of this antenna ? Acts like a Dummy load. - - - - - The Original Question - - - - - Hi, Does anyone remember a weird compact antenna that was featured in a 60's (or early 70's) edition of "73" magazine. Had 2 etched PCBs (like spaced plates) mounted inside a plastic bucket, and fed with coax? Does anyone know more details of this? JEFF ZL3TNV - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It's much nicer and rewarding to be honestly helpful . . . then simply hateful. Oh Gee, Richard isn't being hateful, just responding to your post responding to the original posters msg. The world of engineering is like this - gotta have a tough skin, yaknow? rule 1 is extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If your antenna works, no amount of his scorn will stop it. rest snipped - mike KB3EIA - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
MC,
"If your antenna works, no amount of his scorn will stop it." If Your Antenna Works... Your Will Hear and Be Heard [.] Hey, What Works... WORKS ! ~ RHF .. .. = = = Mike Coslo wrote in message = = = ... RHF wrote: RC, Instead of playing the 'game' of posting a reply to anything I post. Why don't you be helpful to the original poster and attempt to answer his question. First - What type (name) antenna is he talking about ? A Dummy Load Second - What is your 'expert' opinion about this antenna ? Makes a pretty good Dummy load Third - What are the technical aspects of this antenna ? Acts like a Dummy load. - - - - - The Original Question - - - - - Hi, Does anyone remember a weird compact antenna that was featured in a 60's (or early 70's) edition of "73" magazine. Had 2 etched PCBs (like spaced plates) mounted inside a plastic bucket, and fed with coax? Does anyone know more details of this? JEFF ZL3TNV - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It's much nicer and rewarding to be honestly helpful . . . then simply hateful. Oh Gee, Richard isn't being hateful, just responding to your post responding to the original posters msg. The world of engineering is like this - gotta have a tough skin, yaknow? rule 1 is extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If your antenna works, no amount of his scorn will stop it. rest snipped - mike KB3EIA - .. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
Strange Antenna in old 73 magazine ? | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |