Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Aug 2004 12:35:56 GMT, "Lloyd" wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:12:02 -0400, whoever whoever@wherever wrote: I've never talked to or met this guy, BUT, if you want to see what he really is about then look here! http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=f...tnG=Rechercher He makes threats all the time. Read it for yourself! Don't let the door hit ya Chuck. The original post just doesn't compute. The FCC has no authority over anything other than what happens on the air, so a threat posted on QRZ would be out of their jurisdiction. That would be an area for law enforcement to handle. Same thing for Usenet posts. If he made threats on the air, that would be an entirely different matter ... As I understand it, though, the "death threats" go towards Chuck's character, and that is something that the EB and Riely look at in determining whether someone can remain a licensed ham. If Chuck handles it the right way and explains to FCC that it was a joke and that the is no way that Chuck would carry out the threats allegedly made, I'm hoping that the matter would blow over. I'd hate to see one mistake chase an seemingly good person off the air. Chuck doesn't seem to be the Jack Gerritson type who thinks that the law and FCC rules are irrelevant. Splinter |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|