"Airy R. Bean, village idiot" wrung out her tampon in
message ...
That a statement that is complained of is true is a defence against a
libel
action but does not prevent that action from being brought.

A civil action can only be brought against a real person by another real
person.
'Airy R. Bean' is not a real person, it is a sock puppet name that anyone is
equally free to use.

Do you see Airy?
Airy is in the skool bike sheds sniffing the saddles.
Sniff Airy, sniff.

Do you see the plods?
Airy sees the plods.
The plods see Airy.
Run Airy, run.

Do you see the £350 law book?
Airy waves it at the plods.
The plods see the £350 law book.
Run plods, run.

Do you see the sheep?
Airy sees the sheep.
The sheep sees Airy.
Run sheep, run.

Do you see Airy's gum boots?
Airy needs them for the sheep.
Do you see Airy's marbles?
Neither does Airy.
Poor Airy, he's lost both his gum boots and his marbles.

See you in Court, tosser.
(___!___)

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH


Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.
--
Bill

so i better bring a whole flock of sheep to the n wales rallie then its
seems there is going to be a demand (maybe i could charge perhaps a pound a
go with reductions for the usual concessions )

"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" wrote in message
...
See you in Court, tosser.
(___!___)

Frank is it me or have you enlarged the gluteas? ;-)

--

73s de Walter R.

"yammyr6" wrote in message
...
so i better bring a whole flock of sheep to the n wales rallie then its
seems there is going to be a demand (maybe i could charge perhaps a pound
a
go with reductions for the usual concessions )


And this is relevant because........?

"Bill" wrote in message
...
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH


Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.

I agree Bill. Such mis-use of such a serious matter is one stop from
condoning such activities.

--
Brian Reay
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk
FP#898

That's rich coming from Brian Reay who is a sick pervert
obsessed with sheep shagging, as the record of uk.radio.amateur
shows. Mr.Reay repeatedly and gratuitously published his obsession
and continued to do so over a period of many months.

Now, Mr.Reay holds a prominent position in the RSCB's
training hierarchy into which he must inevitably come into
contact with children.

I say that he is an unsuitable candidate for such a position because of
his repeatedly published obsession with sheep-shagging.

As to condoning such activities, ISTR that the behaviour of the
RSCB's Peter Kirby in seeming to condone such activity was
the origin of this thread.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
"Bill" wrote in message
...
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH
Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.
I agree Bill. Such mis-use of such a serious matter is one stop from
condoning such activities.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.

For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.


Actually, the person making the statement has to prove it is true. That
isn't the same thing.

Then again, you are just trying to throw mud at people you don't like.

Dirty tricks. No more, no less.

"Bill" wrote in message
...
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH


Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.

Of course, they could be trying to mask their own activities.

One previous 'contributor' to this NG who had a thing about perverts was
himself once arrested for rape.

RU suggesting that we might be witnessing side-stepping, bull****ting
and downright lying?

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:26:50 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote:
"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.
Actually, the person making the statement has to prove it is true. That
isn't the same thing.
Then again, you are just trying to throw mud at people you don't like.
Dirty tricks. No more, no less.
Why can you not post under your own name, Brian?