Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brad" wrote in message ... "robert casey" wrote in message hlink.net... Perhaps they could demonstrate a PL259 connector instead? Extra credit if they can do it without melting the dielectric insulation of the coax. More points if they can get the solder to actually flow onto the connector body where the shield solder holes are located (helps if you use a small file to remove the plating first). And more points if they remember to put the shell on the cable in the correct direction before doing any soldering ;-) Or they could demonstrate extra skills and just use crimp on PL259's like I do. These are much easier and more reliable. They are more expensive but their construction is superior. My original comment was directed at Dee offering points for something called a "PL256". Brad Yup, some days I can't type. The crimp on would also be an option since I did (purposely) phrase it as install it. In either case, the pass/fail criteria would be continuity with no shorts. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |