Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... "Hamguy" wrote in message ... Phone would'a kicked all of their asses! Heck...Echolink would have SMOKED 'em too! Think so, do you? I'll bet I can get more thru put on CW than you can on phone in the same amount of time. I'm not talking about a short sentence. I mean real traffic. Dan/W4NTI Tell him Dan. We don't need no stinking text messaging. Echolink : Play amateur radio operator "No radio or antenna needed". Ace - WH2T |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... "Hamguy" wrote in message . .. Phone would'a kicked all of their asses! Heck...Echolink would have SMOKED 'em too! Think so, do you? I'll bet I can get more thru put on CW than you can on phone in the same amount of time. I'm not talking about a short sentence. I mean real traffic. Dan/W4NTI Tell him Dan. We don't need no stinking text messaging. Echolink : Play amateur radio operator "No radio or antenna needed". Ace - WH2T How do you figure that the CW throughput will beat phone - at least for clear text. I know that good CW ops can sail along at 50 wpm ( like my Dad, unfortunately not me). But I thought speech was more like 200-300 wpm. So if you do not need to spell out unusual words, phone should beat CW easily. The results could differ if we factor in odd ball words or code groups and QRM/QRN but I thought this was simply clear text. John |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John" wrote in message ... Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... "Hamguy" wrote in message ... Phone would'a kicked all of their asses! Heck...Echolink would have SMOKED 'em too! Think so, do you? I'll bet I can get more thru put on CW than you can on phone in the same amount of time. I'm not talking about a short sentence. I mean real traffic. Dan/W4NTI Tell him Dan. We don't need no stinking text messaging. Echolink : Play amateur radio operator "No radio or antenna needed". Ace - WH2T How do you figure that the CW throughput will beat phone - at least for clear text. I know that good CW ops can sail along at 50 wpm ( like my Dad, unfortunately not me). But I thought speech was more like 200-300 wpm. So if you do not need to spell out unusual words, phone should beat CW easily. The results could differ if we factor in odd ball words or code groups and QRM/QRN but I thought this was simply clear text. John I base it on my experience as a traffic handler in both Amateur and MARS radio. I base it on my experience of personally copying 5 character coded groups in phone and in CW modes on a military circuit. CW has better through put. You hit on the problem yourself. Having to slow down to make sure the other operator copied the text sent. Normally by using the phonetic alphabet. A good CW circuit does not have that problem, and with the use of "cut" characters a whole word/sentence can be sent without sending each individual character. Dan/W4NTI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hope you idiots that bottom post without snipping almost all of the
relevant quoted message understand that 95% of us wouldn't take the trouble to see what such an ignoramus posted. Jim "John" wrote in message ... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote:
I hope you idiots that bottom post without snipping almost all of the relevant quoted message understand that 95% of us wouldn't take the trouble to see what such an ignoramus posted. Jim I see that your last brain cell finally threw in the towel and died. :-( -- Former professional electron wrangler. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rec.radio. cb version: Night Before Christmas | CB | |||
Rare Progressive Rock From Mainland China This Saturday Night | Broadcasting | |||
Cuneiform Records 20th Anniversary Program Saturday Night | Broadcasting | |||
FS: Night Owl night vision | Swap | |||
This Saturday Night: Gary Green Of Gentle Giant Interview Flashback, Colosseum II, Barry Miles | Broadcasting |