Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 1st 05, 12:16 PM
Dr.Ace - WH2T
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...
Using your numbers plus the census data closest in date to your data gives
the following:

Year
Hams
General Population
Hams as a Percent of Population

1917
6,000
103,268,000
0.006%

1928
17000
120,509,000
0.014%

1936
46000
128,053,180
0.036%

1950
90000
152,271,417
0.059%

1956
140000
168,903,031
0.083%

1958
160000
174,984,130
0.091%

1963
250000
189,241,798
0.132%

1977
327000
211,908,788
0.154%

1989
500000
246,819,230
0.203%

1997
678473
267,783,607
0.253%

2001
682240
281,674,017
0.242%

2002
684355
287,941,220
0.238%




Looks more like a leveling off than "dying" to me.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee,
I agree, just because amateur radio is not growing at this time doesn't
mean it is dying.
Ace - WH2T


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shortwv John Lauritsen Shortwave 0 November 28th 04 07:19 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 September 26th 04 07:09 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews CB 0 June 16th 04 08:36 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 16th 04 08:35 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017