Right, this is not good, this guy say's shRt and we are looking at crap
daily on TV that is 1000 times worse! I wonder how many people actually
heard him, and from that group how many give a crap!



"11 Meter ****" wrote in message
...
The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

Fred:

Well, to tell you the truth, the only things I have got against it is,
it is filthy and stinks, other than that, nothing...

John

"fred finklemiester" wrote in
message
...
In article ,
"Travis Jordan" wrote:

Gen. Geroge Hammond wrote:
sadly, I agree

The major infraction was failure to identify - not the obscenity.
Also,
the enforcement letter you cite is only half of the transaction.
The
other ham with which he was in contact was cited for violations,
too.

http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2004/0710.html

**** is in the dictionary. I found **** in the American Heritage
Dictionary, 1975. **** means: To deceive or mislead, among other
things.

Why is everybody so uptight about ****?

In article ,
"Jim Douglas" wrote:

Right, this is not good, this guy say's shRt and we are looking at crap
daily on TV that is 1000 times worse! I wonder how many people actually
heard him, and from that group how many give a crap!


Or give a ****.





"11 Meter ****" wrote in message
...
The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

In article ,
"John Smith" wrote:

Fred:

Well, to tell you the truth, the only things I have got against it is,
it is filthy and stinks, other than that, nothing...

John

Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.









"fred finklemiester" wrote in
message
...
In article ,
"Travis Jordan" wrote:

Gen. Geroge Hammond wrote:
sadly, I agree

The major infraction was failure to identify - not the obscenity.
Also,
the enforcement letter you cite is only half of the transaction.
The
other ham with which he was in contact was cited for violations,
too.

http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2004/0710.html

**** is in the dictionary. I found **** in the American Heritage
Dictionary, 1975. **** means: To deceive or mislead, among other
things.

Why is everybody so uptight about ****?

Fred:

Well, to tell you the truth, the only things I have got against it is,
it is filthy and stinks, other than that, nothing...

John

Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.

Speak for your self.
Ace - WH2T

In article ,
"Dr.Ace - WH2T" wrote:

Fred:

Well, to tell you the truth, the only things I have got against it is,
it is filthy and stinks, other than that, nothing...

John

Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.

Speak for your self.
Ace - WH2T

You mean to say you're not full of ****??

Yes, That is my contention.
Ace - WH2T


Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.
---------------------------------------
Speak for your self.
Ace - WH2T
========================
You mean to say you're not full of ****??

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, fred finklemiester wrote:

Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:58:52 GMT
From: fred finklemiester
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc, rec.radio.shortwave,
rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Subject: Why did you say "****" on the air??

In article ,
"Dr.Ace - WH2T" wrote:

Fred:

Well, to tell you the truth, the only things I have got against it is,
it is filthy and stinks, other than that, nothing...

John

Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.

Speak for your self.
Ace - WH2T

You mean to say you're not full of ****??


Technically, and scientifically, it would probably be quite correct to say
that virtually all of his large intestinal volume really is 100% full of
real ****. Possibly a large fraction of his small intestins, too,
depending on your definition of ****. After death, you ain't worth ****
anyway (except maybe a dollar's worth of calcium, iron, etc.).

There are exceptions (eg. just before colonoscopies, sigmoidoscopies,
situations of that nature, etc.)

I think everyone's **** stinks. So does everyone's gas. Bad breath is not
too nice, either. We all get BO sooner or later, too.

;-)

(smart ass has spoken)

On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:13:51 -0500, "Dr.Ace - WH2T"
wrote:

Unless you have immediately evacuted your bowels prior to writing that
comment i would dare say you may be inn error.
Yes, That is my contention.
Ace - WH2T


Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.
---------------------------------------
Speak for your self.
Ace - WH2T
========================
You mean to say you're not full of ****??

Sure gotta wade thru a bunch of it to find anything here, see you guys
havent changed much...goodbye...K5MDM

Aristotle wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:13:51 -0500, "Dr.Ace - WH2T"
wrote:

Unless you have immediately evacuted your bowels prior to writing that
comment i would dare say you may be inn error.

Yes, That is my contention.
Ace - WH2T



Hi John,

Yes and we're all full of it.

---------------------------------------
Speak for your self.
Ace - WH2T

========================
You mean to say you're not full of ****??