LittleGreenAlien wrote:
What in the **** is the stupid FCC thinking?????


Can you guys even read? He was sited for the major infraction of not
properly identifying his station, very much against the rules, as well
as for his language.

The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

sadly, I agree


11 Meter **** wrote:

The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

Gen. Geroge Hammond wrote:
sadly, I agree

The major infraction was failure to identify - not the obscenity. Also,
the enforcement letter you cite is only half of the transaction. The
other ham with which he was in contact was cited for violations, too.

http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2004/0710.html

11 Meter **** wrote:
The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

What a ****ing waste of energy and our Tax Dollars..

"Dan" wrote in message
oups.com...


11 Meter **** wrote:
The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

What a ****ing waste of energy and our Tax Dollars..

No ****.

Sorry...I couldn't help myself.

"11 Meter ****" wrote in message
...
The FCC says that this guy must submit an EXPLANATION of why he said
"****" on the air on 2m FM simplex. Oh boy.

Are they listening to 11m CB or hams on 75m SSB at night?? Why pick on
that guy?

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-249279A1.html

I think THEY should have to submit an explanation of why they ALLOWED
**** on the air (BPL) - he he!

Pragmatically, the guy must submit an explanation because somebody reported
him to FCC, most likely via ARRL. No, "they" are not listening on 11 meters
nor apparently on 75. But I'd be willing to bet that if you recorded some
of this activity so that the 'culprits' could be identified then reported it
to your ARRL Official Observer Coordinator that they too could get a note
from the FCC.

In article ,
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

LittleGreenAlien wrote:
What in the **** is the stupid FCC thinking?????


Can you guys even read? He was sited for the major infraction of not
properly identifying his station, very much against the rules, as well
as for his language.

cited

In article ,
"Travis Jordan" wrote:

Gen. Geroge Hammond wrote:
sadly, I agree

The major infraction was failure to identify - not the obscenity. Also,
the enforcement letter you cite is only half of the transaction. The
other ham with which he was in contact was cited for violations, too.

http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2004/0710.html

**** is in the dictionary. I found **** in the American Heritage
Dictionary, 1975. **** means: To deceive or mislead, among other
things.

Why is everybody so uptight about ****?

And it's all a year old.

"fred finklemiester" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

LittleGreenAlien wrote:
What in the **** is the stupid FCC thinking?????


Can you guys even read? He was sited for the major infraction of not
properly identifying his station, very much against the rules, as well
as for his language.

cited