Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John S. wrote: beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:27:25 -0500, "Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote: The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is self-propagating, demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs in the United States. Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee? A glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections of the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more spam) Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the FCC has ever given that much credence. I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it is a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL cards...especially those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life Members. One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things, such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the elitism. The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. CQ Contest, anyone? So, what is your stance? Seems like you think they should be done away with? Is that true? What is your recommendation for a replacement? Do you have any solution at all? If you are not a part of the solution then you are part of the problem! I love folks that whine and cry. It is usually what they do best. Break Imperfect though it is, the ARRL is the only voice the ham hobby has these days. It would be a very poor idea to do away with the ARRL without having something better to replace it. The ARRL does need to refocus it's efforts toward attracting newer younger members to the hobby if it is to survive long term. The hobby won't survive if its quasi-regulator continues to do treat amateur radio as though it operates in the heyday that was the 1950's. and it needs to avoid ****ing those folks as it reaches out to them |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy | |||
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) | CB |