Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
No, although for low Q resonators, it's often pretty close. Generally speaking, most relatively simple AM receivers are really only intended to pick up relatively strong, nearby transmitters. As such, you can get away with an awful lot of "cut and try" when it comes to designing the circuit (largely ignore matching impedances, Q's, etc.) and still obtain acceptable results. Thanks for the response Joel. So if I understand correctly, Q is basically an indicator of how well the LC circuit resonates? Could you think of Q as the inverse of a dampening coefficient? If so, I guess ideally you'd get the best Q with an iron-core inductor, thick windings, and as few windings as possible? Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Simple questions on receivers | Homebrew | |||
Receivers, software, etc. | Shortwave | |||
Simple tests | Shortwave | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy |