LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 15th 05, 02:55 AM
dave.harper
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joel Kolstad wrote:

No, although for low Q resonators, it's often pretty close.

Generally speaking, most relatively simple AM receivers are really only
intended to pick up relatively strong, nearby transmitters. As such, you can
get away with an awful lot of "cut and try" when it comes to designing the
circuit (largely ignore matching impedances, Q's, etc.) and still obtain
acceptable results.


Thanks for the response Joel. So if I understand correctly, Q is
basically an indicator of how well the LC circuit resonates? Could you
think of Q as the inverse of a dampening coefficient?

If so, I guess ideally you'd get the best Q with an iron-core inductor,
thick windings, and as few windings as possible?

Dave

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple questions on receivers dave.harper Homebrew 27 July 28th 05 08:45 PM
Receivers, software, etc. [email protected] Shortwave 3 June 26th 05 04:37 PM
Simple tests [email protected] Shortwave 3 June 19th 05 04:39 PM
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' Mike Coslo Policy 24 July 22nd 04 05:50 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017