Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave.harper wrote:
-ex- wrote: I've had good success with ferrite toroids approaching Q=400, although ferrites are by nature very unpredictable Q-wise. Is this the reason a lot of coils are air coils? Easy of calculations? I assume you can get higher performance from ferrite coils than air-core coils, right? Thanks again! Dave Most crystal radio builders go with air core coils...partly because thats the way it has been always done and such plans are available and thats the way its supposed to 'look' ![]() And you CAN make a better Q air coil than what is attainable with ferrite. When I say unpredictable about the toroids, the calculated turns/inductance comes out the same but not the Q. I've wound the same coil on half-dozen 'exact same' ferrite cores and gotten Q ranging from below 200 to nearly 400. Those numbers (in my set) cover the range of not-so-good to pretty-darn-good. I'm not sure why that is other than its not something intended to be. You won't readily find Q charts for ferrites like you do for iron powder cores. As a consequence of this you don't have any guarantee that the cores you get are going to make it to the p-d-g range. There's some advantages and disadvantages with using ferrite cores. The size is the most obvious advantage. Among other advantages - they are not affected by nearby components and do not pickup signals from the air (self-shielding). Thats why I got started with them...I have a 5kw BCB tower about 1600 feet from my QTH! With air core coils the band is totally swamped. On the negative side...the ultimate Q-limitation seems to be about 400, inability to have variable loose-coupling to traps and other stages are most notable. They also don't have the "looks cool" factor like a big coil ![]() Now back down to earth. A random ferrite core inductor is going have a MUCH higher Q than the average coil wrapped around a toilet tissue tube. You're lucky to get 80-100 with that type of coil. It may not play out as being important in a very simple circuit that has other shortcomings but as mentioned before it also helps to have a high starting point on as many of the components as possible. Anyhow...its something else to tinker with! -Bill |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Simple questions on receivers | Homebrew | |||
Receivers, software, etc. | Shortwave | |||
Simple tests | Shortwave | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy |