Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I s'pose Reg, the local expert on proximity effect, etc., should pop in
here and 'splain it all. Seems, though, like it's wrapped up in practicalities. For low-frequency work you typically want a lot of inductance, so you use fine wire so you can get a lot of turns in a relatively small volume. The wire diameter is small enough that, at low frequencies, the skin depth is large compared with the wire size. I believe you will then find that the proximity effect won't have as much influence on the Q as in the case where the skin depth is a small fraction of the wire diameter. So for a 50Hz/60Hz power transformer, you won't find the turns spaced apart any more than needed for insulation. You can do a Google search for conductor proximity effect and find a bunch of references. The stuff at http://www.national.com/nationaledge...c_article.html has some nice pix to show the effect in a bit different environment than we're talking about here. The Q you actually obtain may depend on so many other things than just the shape of the windings that it's not possible to tell you the "best" geometry. But I can tell you that if you make a large coil of good design, you should be able to get to a high enough unloaded Q that doing better with a different geometry about the same size will give you only small returns on the performance in the circuit. That is, if you do manage to make a solenoid coil say 5 inches long and 5 inches diameter, maybe getting the Q up near 500 if you're careful, then operating it at a loaded Q of 100 (for a 10kHz bandwidth at 1MHz), the loss in the coil compared with an INFINITE unloaded Q is so small as to be nearly unnoticable. If my mental arithmetic is right, it would be about a 1dB difference, just barely audible. And of course, you won't get anything like that much improvement in Q with a different shape. Plus--the standard solenoid shape is easy to construct! (There ARE reasons for wanting higher unloaded Q, if you want to operate at a higher loaded Q and if you want to build a multiple-resonator tuner, but my impression is you are not there yet!) Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Simple questions on receivers | Homebrew | |||
Receivers, software, etc. | Shortwave | |||
Simple tests | Shortwave | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy |