Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"b.b." wrote in message
oups.com...

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"b.b." wrote in message
oups.com...

K=D8HB wrote:
"b.b." wrote

Maybe Morse can go back to being an encoding scheme, and Farnsworth
can go back to being a teaching method.

Thus it is, thus it always has been.... I don't understand "go back
to"....

73, de Hans, K0HB

Morse had become merely a licensing hurdle, Farnsworth a testing
scheme. Now if anyone bothers to learn Morse, it will be to use it.

You know something? Your probably right....and actually that is a good
thing.

Dan/W4NTI

People may not always agree with my opinions, but that's OK with me.

There were plenty of Code Tape Extra's out there who never worked a dit
in their lives.

Of course there were/are. Lots of folks never cared a lick if they actua=
lly
operated CW or not. And to them it was a hurdle to do 13 or 20.

Even 5wpm was an unnecessary hurdle to folks not interested in the
mode.

But to those select few that actually enjoyed the mode it became a real p=
ain
hearing about how hard it was to learn, how useless, how unnecessary, et=
c=2E

Why?

Now perhaps the debate will finally END.

I hope so.

And those that like CW can continue to enjoy it.

I certainly hope so.

Just one question; why must I have learned Morse Code for you to enjoy
CW use?

And help those that want to learn it, learn it, and
also enjoy it.

I hope so.

And use it and not have to put up with all the whinning any longer.
=20
Dan/W4NTI

What whining?