Nedlar Nedlar wrote:

: On 1 Aug 2005 10:15:20 GMT, "Lloyd" wrote:
:
: Now there is only one VoIP ham program left which is worth using:
: Echolink.
:
: WRONG!
: There is not, and never has been, 'any' VoIP ham program worth using.

when youre right , youre right.

Extremely right...

--

Chaney

Chaney's World
www.chaney.i12.com

"ZZZZPK "

wrote in message ...
Nedlar Nedlar wrote:

: On 1 Aug 2005 10:15:20 GMT, "Lloyd" wrote:
:
: Now there is only one VoIP ham program left which is worth using:
: Echolink.
:
: WRONG!
: There is not, and never has been, 'any' VoIP ham program worth using.

when youre right , youre right.

But who actually cares what you think about Echolink/Eqso e.t.c. ?

wrote:

: But who actually cares what you think about Echolink/Eqso e.t.c. ?

i could have asked you the same but i thought that it THAT obvious enough

I think the point should be, if you don't like Eqso/Echolink, don't use
it. Some people on this ng will be glad NOT to hear the anti-echolink
folk on it.

wrote in message
oups.com...
But who actually cares what you think about Echolink/Eqso e.t.c. ?


Real hams care.

Dan/W4NTI

I find Echolink is more interesting because all hams are there. Unlike
eQSO has limited hams there.

For new eQSO, they did not mention they want to my ham license for them
to process my registration. Echolink has mentioned on their website.

HS Phuah

I great debate on what a REAL ham is coming over the horizon !! No
doubt everybody will agree on what a real ham is...... Hi.

wrote:

: I great debate on what a REAL ham is coming over the horizon !! No
: doubt everybody will agree on what a real ham is...... Hi.

and i'm sure that with your use of the HI tag, you will be accused of
being an old coffin-dodger-morse-code-user by lazy people who run away
form simple morse tests.