Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: wrote The sheer stupidity of the premise is what kept the Morse Forever warriors going...... Which has WTF to do with a company advertising for telephone linemen, craftsmen, and subcontractors? You should advertise for this company in a more applicable group. This group is for the express purpose of discussing amateur radio policy, especially morse code policy. Thank you for your concern. ******** AA2QA's reply seperator ********* What you do not seem to realize is that the folks that actually learned something (before the multiple guess answers came out), just might have a few skills. These are usually folks that have a genuine interest in how things work, not how to turn a knob or push a button or keys. This isn't to say that folks that simply wish to talk are not welcome; they certainly are. Although I do not possess a college degree, I am a certified electronics technician. I have repaired two-way radios (business and trunking radios). I have done a lot of electrical control and power wiring. I have not worked in high voltage, but have done a fair amount of 277/480 3 phase work. I've climbed atop silos and repaired bag houses. Welded, soldered, cut, run milling machines, surface grinders, lathes, and more. If a saws-all can't do the job readily, the oxy-acetylene tourch will handle it well for me (hmmmm ... wonder how that would solder pl-259s? LOL). Done EMC compliance studies along with UL compliance. Come to think of it, ozone compliance. Can you spell exponential decay? Come to think of it, I've programmed slc-500s, Texas Instruments PLCs, Modicon PLCs, and more (including data highways and ethernet). Even written a program to generate ladders from simply inputting I/O assignments and letting the program know what I want to have happen. Under 15 minutes to properly program 3 cells. Another 5 minutes to debug because someone wired a switch backwards (normally closed rather than normally open). The nice thing about amateur radio is that it encompasses a whole spectrum of individuals, unlike most trade magazines. To me, advertising in an amateur publication such as QST would make a lot of sense, especially if you are trying to locate a number of different skills (rather than a number of ads in different magazines or newspapers). As to Morse, it can be fun. If we had difficulty with it back when (for me, 1962), we learned to overcome that difficulty (not a bad thing to learn, in my humble opinion). Come to think of it, as much grief as it gave me (when memorizing dots and dashes), once I learned it by sound, I enjoyed it and by 1967 had perfect copy at 40 words per minute in the U.S. Navy. More than 40? I don't know; that was the fastest test they had back then. I would have had difficulty much beyond that as we were banging away with manual typewriters then. I might have (possibly) made 50 at most. Disclaimer - that would be perfect typewritten copy filling close to a whole page of paper. A few errors would have allowed me considerably faster copy. Then. (LOL) I'd suggest rethinking your position. Best regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |