Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:42:16 GMT, **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY** wrote:
A disadvantage I see is that a waiver is going to be required in order not to violate FCC rules. In fact, in the state of Florida, interfering with broadcast stations is against state law, so another hurdle to be overcome. Yes, the budget is rich with expected legal expenses. Since DHS has become a player in this, we are hopeful that we can get the necessary punch to overcome FCC and statutory issues. That being said, for this system to work, you have to blanket the entire AM and FM broadcast bands. Even doing so will leave out the motorists who use XM or Sirius, the Ipod listeners and those who are driving with their cellphones plugged into their ears. Do we have to blanket or only blanket each locale, that is, the broadcasting stations of each locale? Not only will we miss those no AM/FM listeners, we will miss those that don't have their radios on. An aggressive, road sign campaign is planned something like " Turn On Your Radio, It Could Save Your Life" type of thing near each incident site. -- Drop the alphabet for email |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | General | |||
What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | Policy | |||
Emergency Messaging And AM | Antenna | |||
No anticipated changes in Morse Requeirement for a while | Policy | |||
Ham-radio is a hobby not a service | Policy |