On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:31:36 -0700, Richard Clark wrote:

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:33:52 -0400, Ari Silversteinn
wrote:
OK, so we supply the amplification.

OK, this is just a re-run of previous speculations. You don't know
the depth of your energy budget crisis, do you?

Open coffers.

--
Drop the alphabet for email

"Ari Silversteinn" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:31:36 -0700, Richard Clark wrote:

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:33:52 -0400, Ari Silversteinn
wrote:
OK, so we supply the amplification.

OK, this is just a re-run of previous speculations. You don't know
the depth of your energy budget crisis, do you?

Open coffers.

--
He wasn't referring to your finance budget, but your energy budget. I
hesitate to say it can't be done in any practical sense, but that's my
thought. The idea of one poster to transmit on the IF's is a good one but I
didn't suggest that because you'll also kill your emergency services comm's.

Incidentally, do you plan to have every loco in the US fitted out or are you
going to fly the loco's to the incident site to do their stuff?

Cheers.

Ken

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:09:19 +1300, "Ken Taylor"
wrote:

"Ari Silversteinn" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:31:36 -0700, Richard Clark wrote:

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:33:52 -0400, Ari Silversteinn
wrote:
OK, so we supply the amplification.

OK, this is just a re-run of previous speculations. You don't know
the depth of your energy budget crisis, do you?

Open coffers.

--
He wasn't referring to your finance budget, but your energy budget. I
hesitate to say it can't be done in any practical sense, but that's my
thought.

Hi Ken,

His terse reply refers to the public coffers - troughs - open for this
fabulous pork barrel feast. You know, crack dealer capitalism.

Nothing has to actually work, or be useful, or even be used. It just
has to generate paper in one direction, and cash in the other. Ari is
mining us as a dry run for all the terms, shortfalls, and fits to the
jigsaw to rummage up into a proposal.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:55:29 -0700, Richard Clark wrote:


Open coffers.

--
He wasn't referring to your finance budget, but your energy budget. I
hesitate to say it can't be done in any practical sense, but that's my
thought.

Hi Ken,

His terse reply refers to the public coffers - troughs - open for this
fabulous pork barrel feast. You know, crack dealer capitalism.

Nothing has to actually work, or be useful, or even be used. It just
has to generate paper in one direction, and cash in the other. Ari is
mining us as a dry run for all the terms, shortfalls, and fits to the
jigsaw to rummage up into a proposal.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Considering that we have many technologies in use, mof, all technologies
that are not in development are in use, this is a load of horse****. If we
build it to spec, whatever that spec is, it will be proprietary and how and
when they use it is not in our hands.
--
Drop the alphabet for email

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 08:09:19 +1300, Ken Taylor wrote:

OK, this is just a re-run of previous speculations. You don't know
the depth of your energy budget crisis, do you?

Open coffers.

--
He wasn't referring to your finance budget, but your energy budget. I
hesitate to say it can't be done in any practical sense, but that's my
thought. The idea of one poster to transmit on the IF's is a good one but I
didn't suggest that because you'll also kill your emergency services comm's.

lol What;s being tossed around is the ability to allow FEMA et all to kill
the ability to transmit and/or we can upon knowing that the emerg comms are
in use.

Incidentally, do you plan to have every loco in the US fitted out or are you
going to fly the loco's to the incident site to do their stuff?

Cheers.

Ken


--
Drop the alphabet for email