Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The phase shift due to the 24 inch coax cables are factored into the
Network Analyzer for all frequencies and so any different lengths will cause the correction factor which is built into the analyzer to be wrong and that will make the reading displayed on the screen to be in error. The phase velocity for most coax cables are similar, so I'd use RG-8 since that accepts type N connectors reasonably well. The impedance bump caused by a thinner cable being adapted to type N cables would be noticeable especially at higher frequencies. The only major question is whether the original cables had a different velocity factor, and that I can't answer so I'd use the RG-8 and it should be close enough. Jim Pennell N6BIU -- 11:50 Pacific Time Zone Dec 3 2005 International Time 19:50 UTC 03.12.2005 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Coax antenna for aircraft, help. | Antenna | |||
Dead Serious T2FD: HV Insulation, EMP Arrestors, extra Coax Choke? | Antenna | |||
Coax length - important ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |